LITT
Try LITT free
AL BUHAIRA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v ARAB WAR RISKS INSURANCE SYNDICATE [2025] DIFC CFI 013 — Refusal of cross-applications for document production (03 January 2025)
The litigation concerns a reinsurance dispute where the Claimant, Al Buhaira National Insurance Company, seeks indemnification from the Defendant, Arab War Risks Insurance Syndicate, under a Reinsurance Contract.
AL BUHAIRA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v ARAB WAR RISKS INSURANCE SYNDICATE [2024] DIFC CFI 013 — Reinsurance governing law and stay application (06 August 2024)
Justice Michael Black KC adopted a pragmatic approach to the order of operations, prioritizing the refinement of the pleadings over the request to halt the litigation entirely. By addressing the strike-out application first, the Court ensured that the scope of the dispute was clearly defined before…
RENOIR CONSULTING v AL TAZEEN GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Amicable resolution and dismissal of proceedings (01 August 2021)
The litigation involved Renoir Consulting (Singapore) PTE LTD as the Claimant, seeking legal recourse against two Respondents: Al Tazeen General Trading LLC and Al Tasnim Enterprises LLC.
RENOIR CONSULTING v AL TAZEEN GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural rescheduling of the Case Management Conference (08 July 2021)
The litigation, registered as CFI 013/2021, involves a commercial claim brought by Renoir Consulting (Singapore) PTE LTD against Al Tazeen General Trading LLC and Al Tasnim Enterprises LLC.
RENOIR CONSULTING (SINGAPORE) v AL TAZEEN GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Joinder of Omani entity via consent order (31 March 2021)
The litigation, initiated by Renoir Consulting (Singapore) PTE LTD on 25 January 2021, originally targeted Al Tazeen General Trading LLC. As the proceedings progressed, the Claimant identified the necessity of involving Al Tasnim Enterprises LLC, a company incorporated in the Sultanate of Oman, to…
RENOIR CONSULTING v AL TAZEEN GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural extension of time for filing a Defence (16 March 2021)
The lawsuit involves a claim brought by Renoir Consulting (Singapore) PTE LTD against Al Tazeen General Trading LLC. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain outside the scope of this specific procedural order, the dispute reached a juncture where the Defendant required…
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2022] DIFC CA 013 — Refusal of permission to appeal and imposition of indemnity costs (04 August 2022)
The litigation concerns a high-value commercial dispute involving claims for damages, restitution, and declaratory relief brought by Hexagon Holdings (Cayman) Limited against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority and Dubai International Financial Centre Investments LLC.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2022] DIFC CFI 013 — Dismissal of claims regarding the termination of a long-term real estate joint venture (02 March 2022)
The Court of First Instance rejects a multi-million dollar claim for damages and restitution, ruling that the failure of a 15-year development project on DIFC plot PA 01 was not caused by the Defendants' breach of contract.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order amending expert evidence timelines (30 November 2021)
The litigation, registered under case number CFI 013/2019, involves Hexagon Holdings (Cayman) Limited as the Claimant against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority and Dubai International Financial Centre Investments LLC.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural adjustment via consent order (16 August 2021)
The litigation, initiated under CFI 013/2019, involves Hexagon Holdings (Cayman) Limited as the Claimant against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority and Dubai International Financial Centre Investments LLC.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order resolving security for costs application (03 August 2021)
A procedural resolution in the ongoing dispute between Hexagon Holdings and the DIFC Authority, where the parties reached a consensus on security for costs, averting a contested hearing.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Adjournment of Case Management Conference (20 June 2021)
The dispute between Hexagon Holdings (Cayman) Limited and the defendants, Dubai International Financial Centre Authority and Dubai International Financial Centre Investments LLC, involves complex allegations surrounding contract termination and associated liabilities.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order adjourning the second case management conference (17 June 2021)
The litigation, registered under CFI 013/2019, involves a claim brought by Hexagon Holdings (Cayman) Limited against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority and Dubai International Financial Centre Investments LLC.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Case Management Order (01 March 2021)
This Case Management Order establishes the procedural roadmap for a complex real estate dispute, mandating strict document production timelines and enforcing a significant interim costs payment.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2020] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural directions for pleadings and CMC (05 November 2020)
The litigation involves Hexagon Holdings (Cayman) Limited as the Claimant, bringing an action against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority and Dubai International Financial Centre Investments LLC.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2020] DIFC CFI 013 — Permission to appeal granted (18 May 2020)
The litigation involves Hexagon Holdings (Cayman) Limited as the Claimant against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority and Dubai International Financial Centre Investments LLC as the Respondents.
HEXAGON HOLDINGS v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2019] DIFC CFI 013 — Strike-out and immediate judgment on contract termination (25 March 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the strict procedural requirements for terminating contracts under DIFC law, emphasizing that failure to comply with statutory notice provisions renders purported terminations invalid.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural dispensation of service for Notice of Discontinuance (10 August 2021)
The lawsuit, registered under CFI 013/2018, involves a complex multi-party dispute initiated by Iraq Telecom Limited. The litigation has seen numerous procedural developments, including multiple extensions of time for the service of the claim form, as seen in [IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH…
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Final order of discontinuance (05 August 2021)
The lawsuit, initiated in 2018, involved complex allegations brought by Iraq Telecom Limited against a group of four defendants: Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi, Nozad Hussein Jundi, Raymond Samir Zina Rahmeh, and International Holdings Limited.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2021] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (10 February 2021)
The litigation, registered under CFI 013/2018, involves Iraq Telecom Limited as the Claimant against a group of four respondents: Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi, Nozad Hussein Jundi, Raymond Samir Zina Rahmeh, and International Holdings Limited.
IRAQ TELECOM LIMITED v AQRAWI [2020] DIFC CFI 013 — Permission for derivative claims and pleading amendments (19 May 2020)
The litigation concerns a minority shareholder, Iraq Telecom Limited, seeking to hold directors accountable for alleged breaches of duty and fraudulent conduct within International Holdings Limited.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2020] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (02 April 2020)
Iraq Telecom Limited initiated proceedings under case number CFI 013/2018 against a group of four defendants, including Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi and Nozad Hussein Jundi.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2019] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (17 September 2019)
The dispute involves Iraq Telecom Limited as the Claimant against four named Defendants, including Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi, Nozad Hussein Jundi, Raymond Samir Zina Rahmeh, and International Holdings Limited.
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2019] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (21 March 2019)
The lawsuit involves Iraq Telecom Limited as the Claimant against four named Defendants: Abdulhameed Abdullah Mohammed Salih Aqrawi, Nozad Hussein Jundi, Raymond Samir Zina Rahmeh, and International Holdings Limited.