LITT
Try LITT free
IRAQ TELECOM v ABDULHAMEED ABDULLAH MOHAMMED SALIH AQRAWI [2018] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural extension for service of claim form (12 September 2018)
A procedural examination of the DIFC Court’s exercise of discretion under RDC 7.21 to extend the validity of a Claim Form in complex multi-party litigation.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2018] DIFC CFI 013 — Discharge of winding-up and freezing orders (17 October 2018)
The litigation between Oger Dubai LLC and Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Ltd originated from efforts to enforce an arbitral award, which subsequently spiraled into insolvency proceedings within the DIFC Courts.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2017] DIFC CFI 013 — Stay of proceedings pending Decree 19 of 2016 Tribunal determination (19 February 2017)
This order confirms the indefinite stay of proceedings in the DIFC Court of First Instance, deferring to the jurisdictional authority of the Tribunal established under Decree 19 of 2016.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2017] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural determination of jurisdictional scope following Joint Judicial Committee intervention (01 February 2017)
The dispute centers on the enforcement efforts initiated by Oger Dubai against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners. Following the commencement of proceedings in CFI 013/2016, the DIFC Court issued various orders supplemental to the Claimant’s enforcement application.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2016] DIFC CFI 013 — Stay of winding-up proceedings pending jurisdictional determination (30 June 2016)
The dispute centers on an insolvency petition filed by Oger Dubai LLC against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited. The Claimant, Oger Dubai, sought the winding-up of the Defendant, a real estate entity, due to alleged financial insolvency.
OGER DUBAI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2016] DIFC CFI 013 — Immediate cessation of trading following winding-up order (16 June 2016)
The dispute centers on the insolvency of Daman Real Estate Capital Partners, with Oger Dubai acting as the claimant seeking to enforce a winding-up order against the defendant. The litigation, filed under case number CFI 013/2016, reached a critical juncture on 16 June 2016, when the court moved to…
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v BARCLAYS BANK PLC [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (11 November 2015)
The dispute arises from a formal claim initiated by Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC against Barclays Bank PLC, registered under case number CFI 013/2015. As is common in high-value banking litigation within the DIFC, the procedural timeline for serving the Claim Form is strictly governed by the Rules…
ABU DHABI ISLAMIC BANK v BARCLAYS BANK [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — procedural extension for service of claim form (10 September 2015)
The dispute centers on a procedural application initiated by Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank (ADIB) against Barclays Bank PLC. Having commenced proceedings under claim number CFI 013/2015, the Claimant found itself unable to complete the formal service of the claim form upon the Defendant within the…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Final withdrawal of proceedings by consent (25 February 2015)
The litigation between Nozul Hotels & Resorts and DIFC Investments originated as a dispute within the Court of First Instance, though the specific underlying commercial grievances were ultimately subsumed by the parties' decision to resolve their differences outside the courtroom.
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (18 February 2015)
The litigation under case number CFI 013/2014 involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Nozul Hotels & Resorts, and the Respondent, DIFC Investments. While the specific merits of the claim remain confidential due to the parties' preference for settlement, the procedural history indicates…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (19 January 2015)
The dispute between Nozul Hotels & Resorts and DIFC Investments involves complex commercial disagreements that have necessitated multiple procedural pauses to allow the parties to reach an amicable resolution.
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2015] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order for temporary stay of proceedings (11 January 2015)
The litigation under case number CFI 013/2014 involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Nozul Hotels & Resorts W.L.L, and the Respondent, DIFC Investments LLC. While the underlying substantive claims remain confidential, the procedural history indicates that the parties reached a critical…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2014] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (29 December 2014)
The litigation involved a commercial dispute between Nozul Hotels & Resorts W.L.L, acting as the Claimant, and DIFC Investments LLC, acting as the Defendant. While the specific underlying contractual or tortious claims were not detailed in the public record of the consent order, the proceedings…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2014] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of stay for settlement negotiations (02 July 2014)
The litigation under case number CFI 013/2014 involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Nozul Hotels & Resorts W.L.L, and the Defendant, DIFC Investments L.L.C. While the specific underlying causes of action remain confidential within the public record of this procedural order, the matter…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2014] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order extending stay for settlement negotiations (16 June 2014)
The litigation in CFI 013/2014 involves a commercial dispute between Nozul Hotels & Resorts W.L.L as the Claimant and DIFC Investments L.L.C as the Defendant. While the specific underlying contractual or tortious claims remain confidential within the public record, the procedural history indicates…
NOZUL HOTELS & RESORTS v DIFC INVESTMENTS [2014] DIFC CFI 013 — Judicial stay for settlement negotiations (20 May 2014)
The litigation involving Nozul Hotels & Resorts W.L.L and DIFC Investments L.L.C represents a high-stakes commercial disagreement brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance. While the specific underlying causes of action—whether contractual breach, property dispute, or investment-related…
BEAUTECH BEAUTY LOUNGE v SHARLYN DELA CRUZ BOLIVAR [2014] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order resolving employment dispute (07 January 2014)
The litigation involved a claim brought by Beautech Beauty Lounge against its former employee, Sharlyn Dela Cruz Bolivar. While the specific underlying causes of action were not detailed in the final order, the dispute centered on the termination of the employment relationship and the associated…
THE EMIRATES CAPITAL v ECSCO GMBH [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Default judgment for debt recovery (16 April 2014)
The lawsuit originated from a commercial debt recovery action initiated by The Emirates Capital Limited against the defendant, ECSCO GmbH. The claimant sought to recover a principal sum of USD $117,737.64, which remained outstanding despite the claimant's efforts to secure payment.
THE EMIRATES CAPITAL v ECSCO GMBH [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — extension of time for service of claim form (12 December 2013)
Judicial Officer Nassir Al Nasser grants a six-month extension for the service of a Part 7 claim form, reinforcing the court's procedural flexibility under the Rules of the DIFC Courts.
THE EMIRATES CAPITAL v ECSCO GMBH [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of time for service of claim form (13 June 2013)
The Emirates Capital Limited initiated proceedings against ECSCO GMBH via a Part 7 claim form dated 26 March 2012. As the litigation progressed, the Claimant encountered difficulties in effecting service of the claim form upon the Defendant, necessitating a formal application to the Court to…
THE EMIRATES CAPITAL v ECSCO GMBH [2012] DIFC CFI 013 — Extension of service validity (02 September 2012)
The Emirates Capital Limited initiated proceedings under case number CFI 013/2012 against the defendant, ECSCO GmbH. As is common in cross-border litigation within the DIFC, the claimant encountered logistical or procedural hurdles in successfully effecting service of the Claim Form upon the…
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2011] DIFC CFI 013 — Reconsideration of leave to appeal in employment disputes (30 June 2014)
The litigation arose from the termination of Aida Dagher, who served as the CEO of Capital Investment International (CII-UAE) Ltd. Following her dismissal without notice on 18 May 2011, Dagher initiated proceedings claiming unpaid salary, payment in lieu of untaken annual leave, and other…
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2014] DIFC CFI 013 — Denial of leave to appeal against the judgment of Justice Ali Al Madhani (20 April 2014)
The litigation between Aida Dagher and Capital Investment International (CII-UAE) Limited has been a long-standing dispute within the DIFC Courts, involving multiple interlocutory skirmishes regarding disclosure, corporate governance, and contempt applications.
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural order for remote witness testimony (23 September 2013)
The dispute in CFI 013/2011 involves a long-standing procedural battle between the Claimant, Aida Dagher, and the Defendant, Capital Investment International. As the litigation progressed, the necessity of obtaining testimony from specific witnesses became a focal point of the court's case…