LITT
Try LITT free
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Conditional order for video link evidence (03 September 2013)
The application filed by Aida Dagher on 9 July 2013 was a direct response to the logistical challenges of securing testimony for the upcoming trial in CFI 013/2011. Given the complex history of this litigation—which has seen numerous procedural skirmishes, including [CAPITAL INVESTMENT…
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural extension for witness evidence (08 July 2013)
The litigation between Aida Dagher and Capital Investment International (CII-UAE) Ltd represents a protracted procedural history within the DIFC Court of First Instance. The case involves complex claims and counter-claims that have necessitated numerous interlocutory applications, ranging from…
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural consolidation and trial scheduling (25 June 2013)
The litigation between Aida Dagher and Capital Investment International (CII-UAE) Ltd reached a critical juncture in mid-2013, necessitating a structured timeline to ensure the matter proceeded to a final hearing.
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Consent order for trial scheduling and procedural directions (24 June 2013)
The litigation in CFI 013/2011 has been characterized by extensive procedural maneuvering, as evidenced by the series of preceding orders, including [CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL v GCC INTERNATIONAL [2011] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural direction on document production (14 December…
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Amended procedural directions for document production and trial scheduling (21 March 2013)
The dispute in CFI 013/2011 involves Aida Dagher and Capital Investment International (CII-UAE) Ltd. Following a hearing on 19 March 2013, the court addressed the ongoing friction regarding the disclosure of evidence.
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural directions for document production and trial management (19 March 2013)
This order establishes the definitive procedural timeline for the trial of Aida Dagher v Capital Investment International, mandating specific document production and the formal appointment of legal representation to ensure the case proceeds to a September 2013 hearing.
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2012] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural stay for mediation (25 November 2012)
The Registrar of the DIFC Courts formalizes a consensual stay of proceedings in the ongoing dispute between Aida Dagher and Capital Investment International to facilitate alternative dispute resolution.
AIDA DAGHER v CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL [2012] DIFC CFI 013 — Assessment of costs for Application Notice 049/2011 (09 May 2012)
The litigation between Aida Dagher and Capital Investment International involves a complex procedural history, which is further contextualized by related proceedings such as [CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL v GCC INTERNATIONAL [2011] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural direction on document production (14…
CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL v AIDA DAGHER [2012] DIFC CFI 013 — Dismissal of contempt application (30 April 2012)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the threshold for initiating contempt proceedings under RDC 29.138, resulting in the summary dismissal of an application filed by Capital Investment International against Aida Dagher.
AIDA DAGHER v GCC INTERNATIONAL [2012] DIFC CFI 013 — Disclosure obligations and self-representation cost rules (29 March 2012)
The dispute centered on the necessity of corporate transparency regarding the entity GCC International Media City — Dubai. Aida Dagher sought the production of foundational corporate documents to progress the litigation, leading to a contested disclosure application.
AIDA DAGHER v GCC INTERNATIONAL [2012] DIFC CFI 013 — Disclosure of corporate governance documents (27 February 2012)
The dispute centers on an application filed by the Claimant, Aida Dagher, seeking the production of essential corporate records held by the Respondent, GCC International. The Claimant sought these documents to substantiate claims within the broader context of CFI 013/2011.
CAPITAL INVESTMENT INTERNATIONAL v GCC INTERNATIONAL [2011] DIFC CFI 013 — Procedural direction on document production (14 December 2011)
The dispute centers on an interlocutory application filed by Capital Investment International, identified as the Applicant, against GCC International, the Respondent. The core of the matter involves the Applicant’s attempt to compel the Respondent to disclose specific documents relevant to the…
SHAHAB HAIDER v ERNST & YOUNG MIDDLE EAST [2013] DIFC CFI 013 — Refusal to set aside Default Cost Certificates (17 April 2013)
The dispute arose from the liquidation proceedings of Orion Holdings Overseas Limited, where Shahab Haider, acting as Liquidator, and Ernst & Young Middle East were engaged in a protracted costs assessment process.
SHAHAB HAIDER v ERNST & YOUNG MIDDLE EAST [2012] DIFC CFI 013 — Finality of judicial deliberations and the non-binding nature of preliminary views (27 August 2012)
The dispute originated from insolvency proceedings involving the liquidation of Orion Holdings Overseas Limited and Diwan Capital Limited. Shahab Haider, acting as the liquidator, sought document disclosure from Ernst & Young Middle East, leading to a protracted legal battle over the scope of…
SHAHAB HAIDER v ERNST & YOUNG DUBAI [2011] DIFC CFI 013 — Consolidation of insolvency-related applications into the Court of Appeal (18 August 2011)
The dispute arises from the ongoing insolvency proceedings involving Diwan Capital Limited, where Shahab Haider, acting as the liquidator, initiated claims against Ernst & Young Dubai LLP.
GORDIAN GAETA v SHAHAB HAIDER [2011] DIFC CFI 013 — Defining the contractual threshold for 'employee' status (18 July 2011)
The dispute arose from the voluntary liquidation of Diwan Capital Limited, a DIFC-registered company. Dr Gordian Gaeta submitted a claim to the liquidator, Shahab Haider, seeking payment of approximately $79,000 in alleged employment and service benefits.
WIEDERKEHR v DIWAN CAPITAL [2010] DIFC CFI 013 — Formal appointment of liquidator in insolvency proceedings (05 July 2010)
The lawsuit concerns the insolvency of Diwan Capital, a DIFC-registered entity. The Claimants, Dr Alfred Wiederkehr and Dr Georg Wiederkehr, sought the formal winding up of the company and the appointment of a liquidator to oversee the distribution of assets and the resolution of the company's…
LESLIE WOOLASTON v LIBERTAS CAPITAL [2009] DIFC CFI 013 — Default judgment for unpaid employment entitlements (25 June 2009)
This decision clarifies the procedural requirements for obtaining a default judgment in the DIFC Courts, specifically regarding the quantification of interest and costs in employment-related claims.
DR ALFRED WIEDERKEHR & DR GEORG WIEDERKEHR v DIWAN CAPITAL [2010] DIFC CFI 013 — Court intervention in stalled voluntary liquidations (28 June 2010)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies its supervisory role in appointing a liquidator when a company resolves to wind up but fails to formalize the process, effectively halting informal liquidation attempts.
LESLIE WOOLASTON v LIBERTAS CAPITAL [2009] DIFC CFI 013 — Default judgment for unpaid employment entitlements (21 June 2009)
The dispute centered on the failure of Libertas Capital Limited to fulfill its financial obligations to Leslie Woolaston following the termination of his employment. The claimant sought recovery of four distinct categories of remuneration: payment in lieu of a three-month contractual notice period,…
ORORO v ODINA [2026] DIFC CFI 012 — Remittal of employment termination dispute (25 March 2026)
The Court of First Instance clarifies the procedural obligations of the Small Claims Tribunal when adjudicating contested employment termination claims, mandating a rigorous examination of evidence regarding the party responsible for the cessation of the employment relationship.
COLLARS & CUFFS BESPOKE TAILORING v BHARAT KUMAR TORANI [2023] DIFC CFI 012 — Consent order discontinuance (15 September 2023)
A procedural overview of the formal termination of proceedings in CFI 012/2023 following a private settlement between the parties.
COLLARS & CUFFS BESPOKE TAILORING v BHARAT KUMAR TORANI [2023] DIFC CFI 012 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (12 June 2023)
The litigation involves a commercial dispute initiated by the Claimant, Collars & Cuffs Bespoke Tailoring Limited, against two named Defendants, Bharat Kumar Torani and Sunil Kumar Chose.
FOUR PRINCIPLES MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FZ v RED SEA INTERNATIONAL COMPANY [2022] DIFC CFI 012 — Conditional variation of default judgment (21 September 2022)
The litigation arose from a claim for management advisory services provided by Four Principles Management Consulting FZ to Red Sea International Company. Following the entry of a default judgment on 9 May 2022, the Defendant sought to vary the judgment, arguing that while it owed a "base fee" for…