LITT
Try LITT free
TALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Expert evidence on non-DIFC Dubai law (10 July 2013)
The litigation involves a complex commercial dispute between Taleem PJSC and two respondents, National Bonds Corporation PJSC and Deyaar Development PJSC. The core of the conflict centers on whether the substantive legal issues governing the parties' relationship are subject to DIFC law or the…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2013] DIFC CFI 014 — Case management directions for trial (12 May 2013)
The litigation involves Taaleem P.J.S.C. as the Claimant against National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. as the First and Second Defendants, respectively.
TAALEEM v DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT [2013] DIFC CFI 014 — Compelling document production and electronic discovery (17 March 2013)
Justice Sir John Chadwick issues a comprehensive order mandating the production of sensitive correspondence and the restoration of electronic records to resolve discovery disputes in the Sky Gardens litigation.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Disclosure obligations and the insufficiency of 'no documents' responses (12 March 2013)
The litigation centers on a complex real estate transaction involving the "Sky Gardens" property located within the DIFC. The Claimant, Taaleem PJSC, initiated proceedings against the first Defendant, National Bonds Corporation (NBC), and the second Defendant, Deyaar Development, seeking to resolve…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2013] DIFC CFI 014 — Case management order for trial preparation (20 February 2013)
The order serves as a comprehensive case management instrument designed to streamline the complex litigation between Taaleem P.J.S.C. and the two defendants. By setting firm deadlines for the exchange of witness statements—initially by 25 April 2013, with reply statements due by 27 June 2013—the…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2013] DIFC CFI 014 — jurisdictional limitations regarding Amlak Finance (05 February 2013)
The underlying litigation, registered as CFI 014/2012, involved the Claimant, Taaleem P.J.S.C., and the Defendants, National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2012] DIFC CFI 014 — Procedural extension for disclosure applications (29 October 2012)
The litigation between Taaleem and the defendants, National Bonds Corporation and Deyaar Development, involves complex evidentiary requirements necessitating strict adherence to the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC).
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2011] DIFC CFI 014 — Procedural consent order for complex multi-party litigation (02 August 2011)
The litigation involves a complex dispute between Taaleem P.J.S.C. as the Claimant, and National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. as the First and Second Defendants, respectively.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2011] DIFC CFI 014 — Dismissal of Application 088/2010 and procedural directions for appeal (08 March 2011)
The litigation in CFI 014/2010 involves a complex dispute between Taaleem and the First Defendant, National Bonds Corporation, alongside the Second Defendant, Deyaar Development. The underlying conflict centers on contractual obligations and potential liabilities arising from development projects,…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2011] DIFC CFI 014 — Granting leave to appeal on jurisdictional and procedural disputes (19 January 2011)
The litigation involves a complex commercial dispute between Taaleem PJSC, acting as the Claimant, and two primary defendants: National Bonds Corporation PJSC and Deyaar Development PJSC.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Jurisdiction over Murabaha agreements and real property novation (21 November 2010)
The Claimant, Taaleem PJSC, sought declaratory relief regarding its indebtedness of AED 236,595,031.07 under a Murabaha agreement and a subsequent novation involving the "Sky Gardens" property located within the DIFC.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Dismissal of ex parte injunctive relief (03 November 2010)
The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Taaleem P.J.S.C. (the Claimant) and two defendants, National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. The core of the matter concerns an application filed by Taaleem on 7 October 2010, in which the Claimant sought urgent, ex…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Anti-suit injunction application regarding parallel Dubai Court proceedings (21 October 2010)
The litigation originated from a contested financial agreement involving a substantial sum of money. Taaleem PJSC initiated proceedings in the DIFC Court seeking a declaration of non-liability regarding a payment obligation.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Jurisdiction and joinder of parties (26 September 2010)
The dispute in CFI 014/2010 centers on complex contractual obligations involving Taaleem P.J.S.C. as the Claimant and two major entities, National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C., as the First and Second Defendants, respectively.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — procedural management of complex multi-party litigation (25 August 2010)
The litigation involves Taaleem P.J.S.C. as the Claimant, initiating proceedings against two major entities: National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. (the First Defendant) and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. (the Second Defendant).
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Procedural extension and case management deferral (20 July 2010)
The litigation involving Taaleem as the Claimant and Deyaar Development as the Second Defendant reached a procedural juncture in July 2010, necessitating a formal extension of time for the filing of pleadings.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Procedural directions for evidence filing (24 June 2010)
The litigation involves Taaleem PJSC as the Claimant, initiating proceedings against two primary Respondents: National Bonds Corporation PJSC and Deyaar Development PJSC. While the specific underlying commercial grievance—whether it pertains to contractual breaches, investment disputes, or property…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Procedural order on confidentiality and public access (06 June 2010)
The litigation involves Taaleem PJSC as the Claimant, seeking relief against two major entities: National Bonds Corporation PJSC and Deyaar Development PJSC. The core of the procedural dispute centered on the Claimant’s desire to shield the proceedings—specifically the hearings, filed documents,…
KTEILY GHASSAN ELIAS v JULIUS BAER [2009] DIFC CFI 014 — Clarifying the scope of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence in DIFC employment disputes (14 December 2009)
The dispute centered on the Claimant’s assertion that his employment with Julius Baer (Middle East) Limited was terminated in bad faith to deprive him of a significant bonus. Mr. Elias alleged that he had been developing a major account, "Prospect B," and had already secured "Prospect A" prior to…
KTEILY GHASSAN ELIAS v JULIUS BAER [2009] DIFC CFI 014 — Striking out pleadings and maintaining confidentiality (26 August 2009)
Justice Sir John Chadwick exercises the Court’s inherent power to prune inflammatory or irrelevant material from the Particulars of Claim while reinforcing the sanctity of private proceedings in the DIFC.
KTEILY GHASSAN ELIAS v JULIUS BAER [2009] DIFC CFI 014 — restricting non-party access to pleadings (17 August 2009)
This order establishes a temporary procedural shield for sensitive information contained in pleadings prior to the Case Management Conference.
AL BUHAIRA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v ARAB WAR RISKS INSURANCE SYNDICATE [2026] DIFC CFI 013 — Appellate case management and evidentiary expansion (04 March 2026)
The DIFC Court of Appeal clarifies the threshold for granting permission to appeal and the admission of fresh evidence in a high-stakes USD 70m reinsurance indemnity dispute.
AL BUHAIRA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v ARAB WAR RISKS INSURANCE SYNDICATE [2025] DIFC CFI 013 — Refusal of permission to appeal and stay of execution (27 November 2025)
The litigation concerns a reinsurance contract dispute where the Claimant, Al Buhaira National Insurance Company (ABNIC), sought an indemnity from the Defendant, Arab War Risks Insurance Syndicate (AWRIS), for costs incurred in defending underlying claims brought by Horizon Energy LLC and Al…
AL BUHAIRA NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v ARAB WAR RISKS INSURANCE SYNDICATE [2024] DIFC CFI 013 — Reinsurance indemnity for defence costs (09 September 2025)
The dispute arose from a facultative reinsurance contract covering a Marine Hull War Policy for the vessel m/t BETA. The Claimant, Al Buhaira National Insurance Company (ABNIC), sought an indemnity from the Defendant, Arab War Risks Insurance Syndicate (AWRIS), following a claim made by the…