LITT
Try LITT free
ORIENT INSURANCE v ABN AMRO BANK [2017] DIFC CFI 014 — Final discontinuance and settlement of multi-party banking dispute (22 March 2017)
The litigation, registered under Case No. CFI-014-2015, involved a complex multi-party dispute between Orient Insurance PJSC and a consortium of major financial institutions and a trading entity.
ORIENT INSURANCE v ABN AMRO BANK N.V. [2017] DIFC CFI 014 — Final discontinuance following global settlement (19 February 2017)
This consent order marks the formal conclusion of litigation between Orient Insurance and Credit Suisse AG, effectively terminating the DIFC Court proceedings following a comprehensive settlement of parallel ICC arbitration.
ORIENT INSURANCE v ABN AMRO BANK [2017] DIFC CFI 014 — Stay of proceedings in favour of ICC arbitration (29 January 2017)
The litigation, initiated under case number CFI-014-2015, involves a complex multi-party dispute between the Claimant, Orient Insurance, and a series of financial institutions and trading entities.
Orient Insurance v ABN Amro Bank [2016] DIFC CFI 014 — Dismissal of negative declaratory relief (19 May 2016)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarified the limits of judicial intervention in insurance disputes, ruling that negative declarations are inappropriate where the underlying debt has been satisfied and no live controversy remains.
ORIENT INSURANCE v ABN AMRO BANK N.V. [2016] DIFC CFI 014 — Refusal of leave to appeal on jurisdictional grounds (01 March 2016)
The litigation involves a complex insurance dispute initiated by Orient Insurance PJSC against a series of major financial institutions and a trading entity. The defendants include several prominent banks and Glints Global General Trading LLC.
ORIENT INSURANCE v ABN AMRO BANK N.V. [2016] DIFC CFI 014 — Refusal of leave to appeal on jurisdictional grounds (22 February 2016)
Justice Roger Giles affirms the robust jurisdictional reach of the DIFC Courts, dismissing an attempt to invoke the UAE Civil Procedure Code to oust the Court's authority over a multi-party banking dispute.
ORIENT INSURANCE v ABN AMRO BANK N.V. [2016] DIFC CFI 014 — Stay of proceedings in favour of ICC arbitration (27 January 2016)
The litigation involved a complex financial dispute initiated by Orient Insurance PJSC against a syndicate of major financial institutions and a trading entity. The defendants named in the proceedings included (1) ABN Amro Bank N.V., (2) Bank of Baroda, (3) Citi Bank N.A., (4) Credit Suisse AG, (5)…
EBERE GITONGA AHAMEFULE IHETU v STANDARD CHARTERED BANK [2014] DIFC CFI 014 — Discontinuance by consent (07 August 2014)
A procedural resolution of a banking dispute in the DIFC Court of First Instance, formalizing the withdrawal of claims through a court-sanctioned discontinuance order.
RUSSELL ERIC PERRY v OGER TELECOM [2012] DIFC CFI 014 — procedural closure via consent discontinuance (12 December 2012)
The litigation between Russell Eric Perry and Oger Telecom Ltd, registered under case number CFI 014/2012, represented a formal claim brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance.
RUSSELL ERIC PERRY v OGER TELECOM [2012] DIFC CFI 014 — procedural directions for reconciliation and trial preparation (08 October 2012)
The dispute between Russell Eric Perry and Oger Telecom, initiated under claim number CFI 014/2012, centers on the court’s insistence that the parties exhaust "justice by reconciliation" before proceeding to full-scale document production.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Consent order dismissing appeal (25 November 2015)
The litigation in CFI 014/2010 involves a complex commercial dispute between the Claimant, Taaleem, and two defendants: National Bonds Corporation and Deyaar Development. The case has been a long-standing fixture of the DIFC Court of First Instance, involving multiple procedural stages, including…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Leave to appeal granted on novation and Murabaha profit charges (18 November 2015)
The litigation centers on the financial obligations arising from the Sky Gardens real estate project. Taaleem PJSC sought to transfer its rights and obligations regarding the project to Deyaar Development, a move that implicated financing previously provided by National Bonds Corporation (NBC).
TAALEEM P.J.S.C. v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Disclosure order regarding judgment debt enforcement (20 August 2015)
The dispute centers on the enforcement of a significant Judgment Debt owed by Deyaar Development (the Judgment Debtor) to National Bonds Corporation (the Judgment Creditor). Following a series of prior rulings, including the Judgment of Justice Sir David Steel on 19 February 2014 and 23 March 2015,…
TAALEEM v DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Denial of leave to appeal against clarification of liability (03 August 2015)
The Chief Justice affirms the finality of earlier findings by refusing to allow a second attempt at appealing substantive liability issues under the guise of seeking judgment clarification.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Registrar’s order for interim payment of costs (02 July 2015)
The litigation in CFI 014/2010 involves a multi-party dispute initiated by Taaleem P.J.S.C. against National Bonds Corporation (the First Defendant) and Deyaar Development (the Second Defendant).
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Consent order regarding disclosure and witness examination (28 May 2015)
The litigation involves a complex dispute between Taaleem P.J.S.C. and the defendants, National Bonds Corporation and Deyaar Development. Following a substantive judgment delivered by Justice Sir David Steel on 23 March 2015, the parties entered a phase of post-judgment procedural management.
TAALEEM P.J.S.C. v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION P.J.S.C. [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Compelling disclosure and personal attendance of a judgment debtor's CFO (13 May 2015)
The dispute concerns the enforcement of a judgment against Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. (the "Judgment Debtor"). Following an ex parte application by the Judgment Creditor, the Court sought to pierce the veil of the debtor's financial holdings to identify assets capable of satisfying the outstanding…
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2015] DIFC CFI 014 — Stay of execution application (27 April 2015)
The application arose from the ongoing litigation between Taaleem P.J.S.C. and the respondents, National Bonds Corporation P.J.S.C. and Deyaar Development P.J.S.C. Following a judgment delivered on 23 March 2015, Deyaar sought to stay the enforcement of the resulting order pending the outcome of…
TAALEEM P.J.S.C. v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION P.J.S.C. [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Quantum assessment and novation of Sky Gardens finance (23 March 2015)
The litigation concerned the financial obligations arising from the purchase of units in the "Sky Gardens" development. The core of the dispute involved determining which party—the original purchaser, Taaleem, or the subsequent transferee, Deyaar—bore the burden of repaying the principal, Murabaha…
DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT v TAALEEM [2014] DIFC CFI 014 — Final denial of permission to appeal (16 October 2014)
The DIFC Court of First Instance definitively concludes the appellate path for Deyaar Development in its long-running dispute with Taaleem and National Bonds, underscoring the necessity of robust, reasoned arguments when seeking reconsideration of refused leave to appeal.
TAALEEM v DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT [2014] DIFC CFI 014 — Denial of reconsideration for permission to appeal (17 August 2014)
The DIFC Court of First Instance reinforces the strict procedural requirements for appellants seeking to overturn a refusal of permission to appeal, emphasizing the necessity of demonstrating substantive error in the initial judicial assessment.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2014] DIFC CFI 014 — Refusal of leave to appeal regarding concluded property agreement (24 April 2014)
The litigation centered on a commercial dispute involving the sale of a one-third interest in residential units within the Sky Gardens development. Taaleem, the claimant, had originally acquired this interest with financing provided by National Bonds Corporation.
TAALEEM v NATIONAL BONDS CORPORATION [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Refusal of leave to appeal regarding property transfer agreement (16 April 2014)
Justice Roger Giles, sitting as a single judge of the Court of Appeal, denies Deyaar Development’s application for leave to appeal, affirming the trial judge’s finding of a concluded agreement for the transfer of property interests in the Sky Gardens development.
TAALEEM v DEYAAR DEVELOPMENT [2010] DIFC CFI 014 — Determining liability for AED 236 million in property investment debt (19 February 2014)
The Court of First Instance resolved a complex multi-party dispute regarding the transfer of property interests in the Sky Gardens development, clarifying the requirements for contract formation and the threshold for setting aside transactions due to alleged conflicts of interest.