LITT
Try LITT free
The "Kay" ex "Vladimir Chivilikhin"
for the second interveners (Applicants in NM 287/99); Vivian Ang and Mark Ortega (Allen & Gledhill) for the defendants (Respondents in NM 287/99); Leong Kah Wah (Joseph Tan Jude Benny) for creditor who had obtained a stop order in Adm in Rem 774/98 Parties : Plaintiff — Defendant — Third Party JUDGM
Morgan Bernard Jean Terigi & 2 Ors v Lawrence Hook & Anor
32,578 shares in Incomlend. On 13 February 2018, those shares were transferred equally to Mr Terigi and Mr Kouchnirenko, with 1 1 Agreed Bundle (“AB”) 317–345. 2 1AB 349–352. 3 1AB 374–411. Version No 2: 25 Jan 2022 (11:58 hrs) Terigi, Morgan Bernard Jean v Hook, Laurence [2022] SGHC 9 3 payme
LOGANATHAN RAVISHANKAR v ACIES LAW CORPORATION
Justice Vinodh Coomaraswamy held that an example of special circumstances would be if the bill of costs fails to provide sufficient information to enable the client to make an informed decision on whether or not to seek taxation (at [61]). In Wee Harry Lee v Haw Par Brothers International Ltd [19
THE WAVE STUDIO PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors v GENERAL HOTEL MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD & Anor
And (1) General Hotel Management (Singapore) Pte Ltd (2) General Hotel Management, Ltd … Defendants GROUNDS OF DECISION [Intellectual Property — Copyright — Infringement] [Intellectual Property — Copyright — Licences] Version No 1: 16 Jun 2022 (16:43 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v SHAWN TAN JIA JUN
that violent acts are particularly heinous when they are committed within the confines of a familial relationship as they constitute an abuse of the bonds of trust and interdependency that exist between family members. Thus, there is a strong need to deter anyone who might resort to such viol
GOH ECK HONG v TAN BOON KIAN
Summary of the Bankrupt’s assets ....................................26 (2) The Bankrupt’s liabilities............................................................27 Version No 1: 31 Mar 2021 (18:58 hrs) ii (A) The Bankrupt’s contingent debts as a personal guarantor for Treasure Resort..............
SOPHIE SHEN v XIA WEI PING & 2 Ors
Plaintiff And (1) Xia Wei Ping (2) Li Zhe (3) Alpheus Management Limited … Defendants JUDGMENT [Conflict of Laws — Jurisdiction] [Conflict of Laws — Natural forum] [Civil Procedure — Service — Service out of jurisdiction] Version No 2: 07 Sep 2022 (21:01 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS THE RELEVANT BACKGRO
CLX v CLY & Anor
the first defendant’s rejection of the Overhead Cranes and its claim for 6 ABCP Vol I at p 60. 7 ABCP Vol I at pp 91 and 138 to 139. 8 ABCP Vol I at pp 806 to 807. 9 ABCP Vol I at pp 102 to 103. Version No 1: 25 Jan 2022 (10:55 hrs) CLX v CLY [2022] SGHC 17 7 rescission of the Contract.10 The
M.T.M. Ship Management Pte Ltd v DEVASWARUPA & 3 Ors
V Bharathy (3) G Darshita (4) Gainady Lokansh … Respondents GROUNDS OF DECISION [Employment Law — Commissioner for Labour — Right of appeal on substantial question of law] [Employment Law — Work Injury Compensation Act — Compensation for death of seafarer following shipboard accident — Wheth
The "Rainbow Joy"
bani and Co) for the appellant; Yap Yin Soon (Allen and Gledhill) for the respondent Parties : — Conflict of Laws – Natural forum – Appellant signing contracts to work on board ship – Appellant injured on ship – Appellant initiating proceedings in Singapore against respondent shipowner and employer
DEREK GORDON PIGG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
well as a reduction in his sentence in the event his conviction is upheld. The appellant also filed CM 32/2021 (“the Criminal Motion”) to adduce further evidence in the form of seven statements given by Yong to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (“CPIB”) in the course of investigations (c
DR ONG KIAN PENG JULIAN v SINGAPORE MEDICAL COUNCIL
The medical profession is held in high esteem because its members have been called to the work of healing. Those who avail of the services of medical professionals must repose trust and confidence in them. This is essential, not least because it is necessary to enable a frank and open exchange of
KPMG SERVICES PTE. LTD. v MARK EDWARD PAWLEY
dit and Security] — [Guarantees and indemnities] — [Guarantor] [Contract] — [Contractual terms] [Evidence] — [Admissibility of evidence] — [Hearsay] Version No 1: 12 Mar 2021 (15:44 hrs) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...............................................................................
JTC CORPORATION v HOT SPRING STONE PTE. LTD.
the AR gave summary judgment in SUM 762 in favour of JTC’s application for rental arrears owed by Hot Spring, the AR also reduced the quantum awarded to JTC by the amount of $95,467.62, constituting two months of rent. 5 JTC appealed against the AR’s decision insofar as the AR found that Hot Spri
Mu Qi & Anor v The Management Corporation Strata Plan No. 1849
on 10 November 2012 (the “November 2012 AGM”), the following ordinary resolution for the creation of a by-law was passed with 87.3% voting in favour of it:18 To consider and if thought fit to resolve by way of ordinary resolution that:- (a) Subsidiary proprietors and/or residents are not allowed
ANPEX PTE. LTD. v CHENG YONG SUN & Anor
JUDGMENT [Tort – Conspiracy – Unlawful Conspiracy to Injure] Version No 1: 20 May 2022 (13:01 hrs) This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law, for publication in LawNet and/or the Singap
Fu Zhihui Alvin & Anor v Accounting And Corporate Regulatory Authority
that s 344(5) of the Companies Act is a general provision empowering the court to restore a company that was previously struck off by virtue of its own Version No 1: 26 Jun 2023 (11:09 hrs) Fu Zhihui Alvin v Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority [2023] SGHC 177 6 application, notwithstan
TRANSASIA PRIVATE CAPITAL LIMITED v TODI ASHISH
[Civil Procedure] — [Summary judgment] [Civil Procedure] — [Inherent powers] Version No 2: 17 Feb 2021 (10:17 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 BACKGROUND ................................................
Kabanov Vladimir & 18 Others v The Owners of The Ship or Vessel "Virgo I" ex "Kapitan Voloshin" and Others
that the court had a discretion to order security to be given. 17. In The Silver Fir security for costs was ordered against both the claimants and the respondents in the arbitration. The orders were made applying O 23 pursuant to which the court may order security for "the defendant’s costs of the a
Hing Yip Containers Pte Ltd v Union Containers Private Limited
giving summary judgment against the defendants in the sum of $296,709.41 plus interest, and awarding costs of $6,000. The defendants appealed against this order. By the time the hearing of the appeal came up before me, the defendants had paid the judgment sum to the plaintiffs. On 6 April 2000, afte
Lee Wen Jervis v Jask Pte Ltd & 2 Ors
that amendments can only be allowed if they raised a reasonable defence, relying on Lim Yong Swan v Lim Jee Tee and another [1992] 3 SLR(R) 940 (“Lim Yong Swan”) at [43].20 He refused leave to amend the pleadings as the proposed amendments raised no reasonable defence.21 The UML defence could no
OK TEDI FLY RIVER DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION LTD & 8 Ors v OK TEDI MINING LIMITED & 3 Ors
for the benefit of the Affected Communities and that the income from the shares would be applied towards compensating the members of the Affected Communities for the environmental damage caused by the Mine.5 Second, the plaintiffs claim that: (a) the first defendant was a fiduciary for the membe
RACHEL YE HUISHI v NG KE MING, JERRY (HUANG KEMING)
[Formation] — [Consent] Version No 1: 02 Nov 2021 (11:24 hrs) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 THE PLAINTIFF’S VERSION OF EVENTS ..............................................2 HOW THE PLAINTIFF MET THE DEFEND
Pegaso Servicios Administrativos S.A. de C.V. & Anor v DP Offshore Engineering Pte Ltd & 2 Ors
SUMMARY OF DECISION .........................................................................70 Version No 1: 27 Oct 2020 (22:41 hrs) This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law, for publ