LITT
Try LITT free
IHUB SOLUTIONS PTE LTD v FREIGHT LINKS EXPRESS LOGISTICENTRE PTE. LTD.
Damages] — [Mitigation] [Landlord and tenant] — [Covenants] — [Implied] [Landlord and tenant] — [Covenants] — [Quiet enjoyment] [Landlord and tenant] — [Covenants] — [Renewal] Version No 1: 27 Oct 2020 (22:40 hrs) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................
Puma SE v Sunday Red, LLC [2026] SGIPOS 4
In Puma SE v Sunday Red, LLC, the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore addressed issues of Trade marks and trade names – Opposition to Registration.
Reddit Inc v Reddio Pte Ltd [2026] SGIPOS 3
In Reddit Inc v Reddio Pte Ltd, the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore addressed issues of Trade marks and trade names – Opposition to Registration.
Lenbrook Industries Limited v Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. [2026] SGIPOS 2
In Lenbrook Industries Limited v Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore addressed issues of Trade marks and trade names – Opposition to Registration.
Cosmetic Warriors Limited v Genpulse Pte Ltd [2026] SGIPOS 1
In Cosmetic Warriors Limited v Genpulse Pte Ltd, the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore addressed issues of Trade marks and trade names – Opposition to Registration.
Law Society of Singapore v K V Sudeep Kumar and another [2026] SGHC 9
A solicitor who knowingly allows a disbarred lawyer to practise law and exercise de facto control over a case commits serious professional misconduct warranting severe sanctions, including striking off for senior practitioners with antecedents.
South of England Protection and Indemnity Association (Bermuda) Ltd (in liquidation) v Pacmar Shipping Pte Ltd [2026] SGHC 8
The six-year limitation period under s 6(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1959 applies to the registration of an arbitral award as a court judgment, but not to subsequent enforcement or execution proceedings of that judgment.
Parvaty d/o Raju and another v National University Hospital (S) Pte Ltd and another [2026] SGHC 7
The court held that medical professionals are not negligent if their actions are supported by a responsible body of medical opinion, and that the duty to advise patients on treatment options is governed by the patient's perspective on materiality, excluding obviously inappropriat
Vanbo Investments Pte Ltd v ph AG and another [2026] SGHC 65
A worldwide Mareva injunction requires a good arguable case and a real risk of dissipation, with a higher threshold for worldwide relief. The court will set aside such an injunction if the claimant fails to provide full and frank disclosure at the ex parte stage.
Santos-Tumalip Maria Monalyn Bagaporo v Public Prosecutor [2026] SGHC 64
In Santos-Tumalip Maria Monalyn Bagaporo v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Criminal motions.
Chua Jun Yang v Kang May Teng Maria Olivia [2026] SGHC 63
In Chua Jun Yang v Kang May Teng Maria Olivia [2026] SGHC 63, the High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the District Judge's orders. The court dismissed the sexual assault claim, ruling the respondent failed to prove allegations on a balance of probabilities.
Public Prosecutor v Pek Lian Guan and another appeal [2026] SGHC 62
In Public Prosecutor v Pek Lian Guan and another appeal, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Courts and Jurisdiction — Court judgments, Criminal Law — Appeal.
Re Alsen Chance Holdings Ltd (in liquidation) (Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Ltd, non-party) and other matters [2026] SGHC 61
The court held that a party who is not a creditor or contributory of a company does not have standing to participate in a winding-up application, and that the mere possibility of adverse costs orders in ongoing litigation does not constitute a contingent liability sufficient to c
Public Prosecutor v Mookkapillai Pazhanivel [2026] SGHC 60
In Public Prosecutor v Mookkapillai Pazhanivel, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences ; Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Trials, Evidence — Principles.
Farooq Ahmad Mann (in his capacity as the private trustee in bankruptcy of Li Hua) v Xia Zheng [2026] SGHC 6
An ancillary relief order in divorce proceedings can be challenged as a transaction at an undervalue under s 361 of the IRDA if it is tainted by collusion or dishonesty.
Public Prosecutor v Johnson Tan Wee Kiat (Johnson Chen Weiji) [2026] SGHC 59
In Public Prosecutor v Johnson Tan Wee Kiat (Johnson Chen Weiji), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences ; Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v DCC [2026] SGHC 58
In Public Prosecutor v DCC, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences ; Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
Leong Yim Ling v Moey Park Moon [2026] SGHC 57
The court held that retirement does not automatically constitute a material change in circumstances justifying the rescission of spousal maintenance obligations, especially where the payor has sufficient assets to continue payments.
Arfat Pannir Selvam and others v Sharad Selvam Ramachandra [2026] SGHC 56
The court upheld the search and injunction orders, finding that the claimants established a serious question to be tried regarding breach of confidence and that the search order was proportionate and necessary to prevent the destruction of evidence.
Xiamen Tonghin Furniture Industries Co Pte Ltd v Goh Heng Tee [2026] SGHC 55
The court held that actual notice of foreign proceedings is sufficient to satisfy the requirements of natural justice, even in the absence of valid service. The court inferred actual notice from the defendant's prior participation in related proceedings and the receipt of court d
Neo San San Cecilia v Loh Soo Chuan [2026] SGHC 54
In Neo San San Cecilia v Loh Soo Chuan, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Loan agreement.
CBB v Wong Tien Leong William [2026] SGHC 53
In CBB v Wong Tien Leong William, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Evidence — Admissibility of evidence, Legal Profession — Disciplinary procedures.
Abdullah bin Mohammad Kunhi v Public Prosecutor [2026] SGHC 52
The court held that the presumption of trafficking under s 17 of the Misuse of Drugs Act cannot apply to an offence of attempted possession for the purpose of trafficking, as the predicate fact of knowing possession is not established.
Public Prosecutor v Hossain Mohammad Azim [2026] SGHC 51
The court held that the Prosecution proved the charges of aggravated sexual assault, criminal intimidation, and perverting the course of justice beyond a reasonable doubt, based on the complainant's credible testimony and corroborative evidence.