LITT
Try LITT free
UDAY MEHRA v L CAPITAL ASIA ADVISORS & 3 Ors
a position in LVMH concurrently with his position in the LCA Group, as LVMH’s Group President for Southeast Asia.7 15 These meetings led to the LCA Group making a formal offer in June 2011 to employ the plaintiff as its Regional Managing Director of Operations.8 The plaintiff did not ultimately
ER KOK YONG (YU GUORONG) & Anor v TAN CHENG CHENG (CHENG QINGQING) (AS CO-ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SPENCER TUPPANI) & 2 Ors
(“Suit 438”) in the same trial before me. Both suits centred on assets held in the sole name of one Spencer Tuppani (“Spencer”), who passed away on 10 July 2017 after being stabbed by his father-in-law. It was after Spencer’s passing that the Plaintiffs Er Kok Yong (“Jason”) and Lim Soon Hwa Lawr
THE KING'S CHALLENGE PTE. LTD. & Anor v GABRIELE BAER-RICHNER
again at her home in Zurich, where another discussion was allegedly held, and according to the plaintiffs, the defendant affirmed that she would take four places for herself and her children for the tour. It is not clear if this was a reference to the 5 October 2014 tour or the 28 March 2015 tour
ANDREW GRIMMETT & 2 Ors v HTL INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. (UNDER JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT)
SUMMARY OF JUDICIAL MANAGERS’ CASE ......................................6 SUMMARY OF CREDITOR’S CASE ........................................................10 SUMMARY OF SHAREHOLDERS’ CASE...............................................13 DECISION....................................................
Sintalow Hardware Pte Ltd v Ricwil (Singapore) Pte Ltd
on 29 January 1993. At that meeting, he said he informed the other directors of Ricwil namely Jeffrey Low (the moving spirit behind Ricwil Malaysia), Tan Chin Seng and Stanley Wong of Sintalow’s service charge for Ricwil occupying Sintalow’s premises. At the meeting, Mr Tan questioned Mr Chew whethe
POSH PROJECTS PTE LTD v Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel YANGTZE HARMONY (IMO No. 9318917)
held in court in the event the ship is judicially sold? The dichotomy between proceedings in personam and in rem may become somewhat blurred when arbitral awards rendered against named defendants in personam are sought to be enforced in admiralty actions in rem commenced against ships. 3 The pr
MUHAMMAD ADAM LEE BIN MUHAMMAD LEE v TAY JIA RONG SEAN
Summary of Award on TBI................................................34 (2) Facial fractures............................................................................35 (3) Lung injuries and urinary tract infection.....................................35 (4) Lower limb injuries...................
SUE CHANG (XU ZHENG) v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
JUDGMENT [Criminal Law — Statutory offences — Road Traffic Act] [Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing — Sentencing framework — Section 65(3)(a) of the Road Traffic Act] Version No 1: 25 Jul 2022 (11:57 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Eddie Lee Zheng Da & Yap Peng Keong, Darren
a job as a private hire driver and thus had the use of a car. It is not in dispute that Lee later recruited Yap to transport drugs for him.2 1 Transcript, 19 Oct 2021, p 46 lines 18‒20, p 54 lines 30‒32, p 55 lines 1‒8; 21 Oct 2021, p 38 lines 6‒8. 2 Transcript, 19 Oct 2021, p 86 lines 20‒23;
FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD & 2 Ors v PTC BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTE LTD
ovation Singapore Pte Ltd (3) FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp And PTC Business Systems Pte Ltd GROUNDS OF DECISION [Intellectual Property] — [Copyright] — [Infringement] — [Primary infringement] [Intellectual Property] — [Copyright] — [Infringement] — [Secondary infringement] [Intellectual Prop
Adeline Toh Tun Li v Central Provident Fund Board & Anor
on a statutory trust in favour for a nominated beneficiary (or the eligible beneficiaries under s 25A(1) of the CPF Act should no nomination have been made). It is trite law that what falls within the ambit of a statutory trust and the obligations of a statutory trustee are matters of statutory
THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE v ZERO GERALDO MARIO NALPON
DGMENT [Legal Profession — Contempt of court] [Legal Profession — Disciplinary proceedings] [Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Breach] [Legal Profession — Professional conduct — Grossly improper conduct] [Legal Profession — Show cause action] Version No 1: 12 Apr 2022 (12:22 hrs) i TABLE
The "Mezen"
that “goods carried in a ship” referred only to “goods carried as cargo”, on the basis of the long established decision of R v City of London Court Judge [1883] 12 QBD 115. The court went on to hold that even though “goods” was extended to include “baggage” by section 8(1) of the Administration of J
R. MANOKARAN & 3 Ors v CHUAH AH LENG & 2 Ors
… Plaintiffs And 1. Chuah Ah Leng 2. Zenwan (M) Sdn Bhd 3. Grassland Express & Tours Pte Ltd … Defendants Suit No 1307 of 2018 Between 1. Wee Chye Hee 2. Xie Lianzhu @ Ye Lianzhu … Plaintiffs And 1. Chuah Ah Leng 2. Zenwan (M) Sdn Bhd 3. Grassland Express Pte Ltd … Defendants Version No 1: 24
GOH SIAM TEOW v LIM TUNG HEE ARTHERO
on trust for him. 8 The evidence does not support the respondent’s narrative. The documents only show that the respondent contributed from his CPF accounts, and that the cash payments were made by G. Although the housing loan for the Lorong 5 Toa Payoh flat was paid for by the respondent, he onl
Castlewood Group Pte. Ltd. (in Creditor's Voluntary Liquidation)
Castlewood Group Pte Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) … Applicant BRIEF REMARKS [Insolvency Law — Winding up — Third-party litigation funding] Version No 1: 23 May 2022 (12:21 hrs) This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to
PORTCOM PTE LTD & 2 Ors v VERRENCY GROUP LIMITED & Anor
Rev Ed) (the “CA”) to compulsorily acquire the shares held by those non- assenting shareholders. The questions for the court are first, whether the section has been complied with and secondly, if it has, whether it would be unfair to permit the Australian company to proceed with compulsory acquisi
THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE v CLARENCE LUN YAODONG
a practising certificate for 2 years, 10 months and 16 days in the preceding seven years. 10 Ms Sunil commenced her TC on 2 January 2020. On that date, the respondent had only held a practising certificate for 2 years, 11 months and 3 days in the preceding seven years. On 5 January 2020, Ms Sunil
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd v Daewoo Singapore Pte Ltd and Another
He held that the company was not in breach of the contract. The contract was discharged where the power of the company to carry on business was taken away by something for which the company was not responsible. The company could not continue its business by reason of losses. MacEwan himself advised
The "Ching Ho" And Another
k Tsung Hao (Allen & Gledhill) for the second and fourth plaintiffs; Leong Kah Wah and Derek Tan (Joseph Tan Jude Benny) for the defendants Parties : — Civil Procedure – Originating processes – Writ – Extension of validity – Grounds for extension – Non-service of writ due to plaintiffs' alleged mis
WILLIAM LIM TIEN HOU v LING KOK HUA
in the appellant’s bank account, were frozen and seized. Both the appellant and respondent lay claim to the Moneys. The DJ’s full grounds of decision are set out at William Lim Tien Hou v Ling Kok Hua [2021] SGDC 237 (“GD”).13 Decision below 8 The DJ ordered the return of the Moneys to the respon
DEBENHO PTE LTD & Anor v ENVY GLOBAL TRADING PTE. LTD. & Anor
that there was little risk of a multiplicity of proceedings to justify a stay. This was because the plaintiffs had confirmed that they would not be applying for leave to continue 42 Ng’s 1st Affidavit at para 17(b). 43 PWS at para 6(c). Version No 1: 14 Jan 2022 (11:33 hrs) Debenho Pte Ltd v
Tan Mei Sin v Tan Ah Lim
that the plaintiff has standing in this case. Version No 1: 29 Jul 2022 (17:16 hrs) Tan Mei Sin v Tan Ah Lim [2022] SGHC 183 7 Whether the plaintiff has obtained the SLA’s extension of time 17 However, notwithstanding that the plaintiff has standing, I found that she has not obtained the required e
TAY JIE QI
been held in connection with the misconduct; (c) the nature and extent of and the circumstances surrounding the initial and subsequent disclosures about the misconduct made by the applicant in her application for admission; (d) any evidence of remorse; and (e) any evidence of rehabilitation inc