LITT
Try LITT free
SK LATERAL RUBBER & PLASTIC TECHNOLOGIES (SUZHOU) CO., LTD v LATERAL SOLUTIONS PTE LTD
by SKL for the manufacture of parts. Lateral claims damages for wrongful detention or conversion of the equipment. Fourthly, Lateral says that SKL wrongfully ceased to supply parts under the Agreement, which it alleges by discussion and conduct was or became a long term supply agreement, and cla
Teras Offshore Pte Ltd v Teras Cargo Transport (America) LLC
Defendant JUDGMENT [Contract] – [Breach] – [Non-payment] [Contract] – [Contractual terms] – [Scope of work] Version No 1: 27 Oct 2020 (22:40 hrs) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 THE LNG PROJECTS AND TH
MOHAMED SHIYAM v TUFF OFFSHORE ENGINEERING SERVICES PTE LTD
the Assistant Registrar’s decision to grant unconditional leave to defend, but ordered that some minor additional parts of the Defence be struck out. 19 The Amended Defence, amended in accordance with these decisions, was filed on 27 November 2020. 20 On 9 December 2020, the defendant applied fo
CJM & 6 Ors v CJT
iffs And (1) CJT … Defendant JUDGMENT [Civil Procedure] — [Costs] Version No 1: 27 Aug 2021 (17:44 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 PRE-TRANSFER COSTS...................................................
CLQ v CLR
by the Government, a letter from a competent Governmental authority authorizing the Government to hold shares in that company, is required to be submitted along with company registration documentation. Furthermore, a letter from a competent Governmental authority authorizing the appointment of
PT ADIDAYA ENERGY MANDIRI v MS FIRST CAPITAL INSURANCE LIMITED
covered subject to additional terms if required to be agreed”. The Insured Value was US$4,700,000 and the General Conditions included a waiver of rights of subjugation against any subsidiary, affiliated or interrelated company of the Assured as well as a deferred premium clause which referred to
BACHMEER CAPITAL LIMITED v ONG CHIH CHING & 7 Ors
that the witness in California could give relevant evidence, that the plaintiffs had no control over the witness and could only rely on his willingness to help them, and that the plaintiffs had made the necessary attempts to secure the witnesses presence in Singapore for the purpose of the trial
CKG v CKH
] — [Recourse against award] — [Setting aside] — [Remission] Version No 2: 23 Jul 2021 (14:26 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 COURT’S APPROACH TO AN APPLICATION TO SET ASIDE AN AWARD ................
CES v International Air Transport Association
the learned Arbitrator (“the Tribunal”) held that he has jurisdiction to hear the claim.3 Being dissatisfied, by an Originating Summons filed on 17 June 2019, CES applied to the Singapore High Court, pursuant to s 10 of the International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A, 2002 Rev Ed) (“IAA”) read with A
HAI JIAO 1306 LIMITED v YAW CHEE SIEW
SUMMARY CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS POST TERMINATION OF EACH OF THE BBCS.....................................................................................................68 CLAIM 1: BREACHES OF THE BEST ENDEAVOURS OBLIGATIONS CONTAINED IN THE FIRST AND SECOND LETTERS OF SUPPORT ......................
THE STAR ENTERTAINMENT QLD LIMITED v WONG YEW CHOY
THE PLAINTIFF’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT APPLICATION AND THE STRIKE- OUT APPLICATION............................................................................................7 CONCLUSION...............................................................................................27 Version No 1: 27 Oct 2
CMJ & Anor v CML & Anor
Tribunal”) dismissed all of CMJ’s claims but upheld CML’s counterclaim to a limited extent and awarded damages in respect of those breaches. 6 CMJ seek to set aside the Award on the ground that there were breaches of natural justice in that they were not given a fair opportunity to present their
CMC v CMD
rea Co, Ltd … Defendant JUDGMENT [Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside] Version No 1: 27 May 2022 (14:00 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 1 BACKGROUND ...............
GOKUL PATNAIK v NINE RIVERS CAPITAL LIMITED
by the Promoter(s) to offer the same to the Third Party purchaser, provided that the securities of the Promoter(s) that are dragged along should be sold to any Third Party purchaser on the same terms and conditions as those of the Investor (“Drag Along Right”). 4 Gokul’s 1st Affidavit at pp 135
ROLL SG PTE. LTD. v CONG TY CO PHAN VAN TAI LIEN HIEP HUY HOANG
… Defendant JUDGMENT [Contract — Breach — Rental agreement] [Contract — Remedies — Damages] Version No 1: 25 Apr 2023 (14:46 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 BACKGROUND .................................
BNP PARIBAS SA v JACOB AGAM & Anor
on the facts, that factors (a) and (b) indicated some connection of the action with Singapore in a procedural or administrative sense but were not “substantial” and factors (c) to (e) were, at best, peripheral to the action (at [16]). Rather, the Court in Teras held that what was critical was tha
CPIT INVESTMENTS LIMITED v QILIN WORLD CAPITAL LIMITED & Anor
held on trust by Qilin as the proceeds of the sale of the Pledged Shares (at [300(a)]). I also ordered an account be taken of the profits made by Qilin in respect of that sum held on trust (at [300(b)]). Background 4 Pursuant to the terms of a consent order dated 12 February 2016 and a solicitor
CUG & 3 Ors v CUH
SUMMARY OF THE RELEVANT BACKGROUND.................................3 THE PARTIES...................................................................................................3 THE JV PROJECT .............................................................................................4 ENGAGEMEN
TWARIT CONSULTANCY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & Anor v GPE (INDIA) LTD & 2 Ors
by the relevant defendant, for a total price in the three SPAs of INR200,00,00,000.10 The plaintiffs were to purchase the shares in 14 tranches on various dates from 30 September 2015 to 30 June 2018.11 10 Secondly, a so-called letter agreement (“the First Letter Agreement”) was entered into betw
BXS v BXT
JUDGMENT [Civil Procedure] — [Costs] Version No 1: 27 Oct 2020 (22:41 hrs) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 DISCUSSION ......................................................................................
JUDAH VALUE ACTIVIST FUND v OPEN FAITH INVESTMENT LIMITED
SUMMARY OF THE PLAINTIFF’S CASE............................................................65 SUMMARY OF THE DEFENDANT’S CASE ........................................................68 Remoteness...............................................................................................69 Causati
LAO HOLDINGS N.V. v THE GOVERNMENT OF THE LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
60% of the shares in PV, while GOL and ST held 20% each. After the monopoly rights were stripped, GOL then ordered PV to return a land concession in December 2008, and then terminated the PV PDA in April 2010. This related to Paksong Vegas. (b) In March 2011, GOL ordered Paksan Club to be shut
CPU & 2 Ors v CPX
SUMMARY OF APPLICANTS’ CASE AS TO RELEVANT BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................6 THE PRECEDING TRANSACTIONS.....................................................................6 THE SETTLEMENT CONTRACT AND SUPPLEMENTAL SETTLEMENT
DYSTAR GLOBAL HOLDINGS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. v KIRI INDUSTRIES LIMITED & 4 Ors
done at Kiri’s request and, as this court held in the Judgment, on the condition that Kiri agreed (as it had done) to bear the costs of the audit. By its decision communicated to the parties on 19 July 2018, this court ordered statutory interest of 5.33% to run on the €1.7 million and S$443,813 f