LITT
Try LITT free
In the Matter of Section 73 of the Companies Act and In the Matter of Beaufort Sentosa Development Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 222
Analysis of [2001] SGHC 222, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-08-14.
Flagship Agencies Pte Ltd (formerly known as Adena Trading & Engineering Pte Ltd) v BBQ Express Pte Ltd (formerly known as Meadowbake Delicatessen Pte Ltd) [2001] SGHC 218
In Flagship Agencies Pte Ltd (formerly known as Adena Trading & Engineering Pte Ltd) v BBQ Express Pte Ltd (formerly known as Meadowbake Delicatessen Pte Ltd), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam v Indra Krishnan [2001] SGHC 215
In Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam v Indra Krishnan, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Public Prosecutor v Julia Elizabeth Tubbs [2001] SGHC 214
In Public Prosecutor v Julia Elizabeth Tubbs, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Denis Matthew Harte v Tan Hun Hoe and Another [2001] SGHC 19
Case Details * Citation: [2001] SGHC 19 * Case Number: Suit 1691/1999 * Decision Date: 31 January 2001 * Court: High Court of Singapore * Coram: Chan Seng Onn JC * Judgment Delivered By: Chan Seng Onn
In the matter of Part V of the Bankruptcy Act 1995 (Cap 20) v In the matter of an application for an Interim Order v in the matter of a Voluntary Arrangement by Lek Kee Meng [2001] SGHC 187
In In the matter of Part v of the Bankruptcy Act 1995 (Cap 20) v In the matter of an application for an Interim Order v in the matter of a Voluntary Arrangement by Lek Kee Meng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
In the Matter of Part V of the Bankruptcy Act 1995(Cap20) and In the Matter of an Application for an Interim Order and In the Matter of a Voluntary Arrangement by Lek Kee Meng [2001] SGHC 181
In In the Matter of Part v of the Bankruptcy Act 1995(Cap20) and In the Matter of an Application for an Interim Order and In the Matter of a Voluntary Arrangement by Lek Kee Meng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Kim Eng Securities (Pte) Ltd v Ong Eng Poh [2001] SGHC 18
In Kim Eng Securities v Ong Eng Poh [2001] SGHC 18, the High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' claims, allowed Chu's counterclaim for unauthorized appropriation of sale proceeds, and dismissed Ching's counterclaim for inconsistent pleading regarding her nominee status.
Wellform Construction Pte Ltd v Lay Sing Construction Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 12
The Singapore High Court ruled in favor of Wellform Construction, ordering Lay Sing to pay $222,938.43 in profit shares. The court rejected Lay Sing's attempt to reduce payments through fabricated sub-contract expenses, affirming that profit-sharing must be based on substantiated project costs.
In the Matter of Section 102 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161) Revised Edition 2001 v In the Matter of an application by Nirmal singh s/o Fauja Singh [2001] SGHC 174
In In the Matter of Section 102 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161) Revised Edition 2001 v In the Matter of an application by Nirmal singh s/o Fauja Singh, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
A S Nordlandsbanken and Another v Robin Hoddle Nederkoorn [2001] SGHC 168
In A S Nordlandsbanken and Another v Robin Hoddle Nederkoorn, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
In the matter of Companies Act (Chapter 50, Revised Edition 1994) v In the matter of Grandlink Group Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 167
In In the matter of Companies Act (Chapter 50, Revised Edition 1994) v In the matter of Grandlink Group Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Re Lim Kiap Khee [2001] SGHC 163
Analysis of [2001] SGHC 163, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-06-30.
Tunas (Pte) Ltd v Ng Man-Leong [2001] SGHC 16
In Tunas (Pte) Ltd v Ng Man-Leong [2001] SGHC 16, the High Court struck out the plaintiffs' claim, ruling that the issues were res judicata. The court held that the plaintiffs were estopped from re-litigating matters they had previously affirmed through their conduct in earlier proceedings.
Han Teck Soo v Teo Ooi Leng, Irene [2001] SGHC 152
In Han Teck Soo v Teo Ooi Leng, Irene, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Asia-Pacific Ventrues II Limited & Ors v P.T. Intimutiara Gasindo & Ors [2001] SGHC 151
In Asia-Pacific Ventrues II Limited & Ors v P.T. Intimutiara Gasindo & Ors, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Asia-Pacific Ventures II Limited & Ors v PT Intimutiara Gasindo & Ors [2001] SGHC 150
In Asia-Pacific Ventures II Limited & Ors v PT Intimutiara Gasindo & Ors, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Wong Kok Keong @ Wong Kock Khiang v 1.CBN Holdings Pte Ltd; 2.Lee Sook Chin; 3.Leaw Kok Yin [2001] SGHC 148
In Wong Kok Keong @ Wong Kock Khiang v 1.CBN Holdings Pte Ltd; 2.Lee Sook Chin; 3.Leaw Kok Yin, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
1.Chew Kia Ngee 2.Chan Ket Teck as Liquidators of PcChip Computer Manufacturer (S) Pte Ltd and Oversea-Chinese Banking COrporation Limited [2001] SGHC 132
Analysis of [2001] SGHC 132, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-06-13.
Tan Yeow Khoon & Another v The Law Society of Singapore [2001] SGHC 130
In Tan Yeow Khoon & Another v The Law Society of Singapore, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
In te Matter of Section 102 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161) revised Edition 2001 v In the Matter of an application by Nirmal Singh s/o Fauja Singh [2001] SGHC 128
In In te Matter of Section 102 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161) revised Edition 2001 v In the Matter of an application by Nirmal Singh s/o Fauja Singh, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Chan Fook Kee v Chan Siew Fong [2001] SGHC 118
In Chan Fook Kee v Chan Siew Fong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Public Prosecutor v Lim Lye Kim [2001] SGHC 112
In Public Prosecutor v Lim Lye Kim, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Teo Song Kwang Richard v Seng Hup Electric Company (S) Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 108
In Teo Song Kwang Richard v Seng Hup Electric Company (S) Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.