LITT
Try LITT free
Ronny Chin Hong Onn v Tanah Merah Country Club [2001] SGHC 101
In Ronny Chin Hong Onn v Tanah Merah Country Club, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
RE Chan Yoo Tuck (Tony Chandra) [2000] SGHC 94
Analysis of [2000] SGHC 94, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2000-05-25.
Public Prosecutor v Lim Beng Soon and Another [2000] SGHC 85
In Public Prosecutor v Lim Beng Soon [2000] SGHC 85, the court acquitted the second accused, ruling that the prosecution's failure to call a material witness created a fatal gap in evidence, despite the first accused's conviction.
Hsing Mei Construction Pte Ltd v Lim Check Meng [2000] SGHC 75
In Hsing Mei Construction Pte Ltd v Lim Check Meng [2000] SGHC 75, the High Court upheld a summary judgment for progress payments while allowing the defendant to defend a loan claim, provided security was furnished. The case clarifies the threshold for setting aside default judgments.
Societe Generale v Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 64
In Societe Generale v Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 64, the Singapore High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim, ruling that the debtor's failure to pay was due to insolvency rather than a commercial dispute, emphasizing strict evidentiary standards for insolvency triggers.
Public Prosecutor v Chia Jin Hock [2000] SGHC 63
In Public Prosecutor v Chia Jin Hock [2000] SGHC 63, the court sentenced the accused to life imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for threatening police officers with a firearm. The judgment clarifies the interpretation of criminal intimidation and the strict sentencing under the Arms Offences Ac
Precious Wishes Limited v Sinoble Metalloy International (Pte) Ltd [2000] SGHC 5
Case Details * Citation: [2000] SGHC 5 * Case Number: Adm in Per 790/1998 * Decision Date: 10 January 2000 * Court: High Court of the Republic of Singapore * Coram: Judith Prakash J * Judgment Delivered
Gema Metal Ceilings (Far East) Pte Ltd v Iwatani Techno Construction (M) Sdn Bhd [2000] SGHC 37
In Gema Metal Ceilings v Iwatani Techno Construction, the court ruled the plaintiffs breached their contract to design a proper ceiling system. The defendants were awarded damages, and the plaintiffs were ordered to pay costs, establishing that defect warranties do not preclude legal action.
Neo Boh Tan v Ng Kim Whatt [2000] SGHC 31
In Neo Boh Tan v Ng Kim Whatt [2000] SGHC 31, the Court held that a resulting trust arose by operation of law to reflect the plaintiff's sole financial contribution to an HDB flat, confirming that such trusts are permissible when not used to circumvent HDB eligibility regulations.
Frontfield Investment Holding (Pte) Ltd and 1.The Management Corporation Strata Title no.938 2.Chiam Chong Yang 3.Tham Yu Mei 4.Yap Lee Tuan Nee Tan 5.Tan Siew Hua alias Yap Soo Hai [2000] SGHC 290
Analysis of [2000] SGHC 290, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2000-06-30.
Twin Enterprises Pte Ltd v Lim Heng Wah Peter [2000] SGHC 288
The High Court allowed the defendant's appeal, setting aside a $177,000 credit awarded to the plaintiffs. The court ruled that the plaintiffs' failure to cross-examine the defendant on specific invoice entries precluded them from challenging the claim, citing the rule in Browne v Dunn.
Public Prosecutor v Jimmy Goh Chye Soon [2000] SGHC 278
In Public Prosecutor v Jimmy Goh Chye Soon, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Lim Choon Lai v Chew Kim Heng [2000] SGHC 264
In Lim Choon Lai v Chew Kim Heng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Public Prosecutor v Tan Ah Kit [2000] SGHC 254
In Public Prosecutor v Tan Ah Kit, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Public Prosecutor v Lee Wee Cheng [2000] SGHC 249
In Public Prosecutor v Lee Wee Cheng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Subramaniam s/o Kalimuthu and Another v Ng Hwee Cheng Doreen practicing under the name and style of Ng & Co [2000] SGHC 223
The High Court dismissed the claim against a solicitor, ruling she fulfilled her duties by explaining mortgage terms and following a letter of authority. However, the court penalized her with only 50% of costs for failing to verify instructions from a third party, highlighting the need for due dilig
Kitnasamy S/O Marudapan v Nagatheran S/O Manogar and Another [2000] SGHC 21
In Kitnasamy S/O Marudapan v Nagatheran S/O Manogar and Another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Panatron Pte Ltd v Lee Cheow Lee and Others [2000] SGHC 209
In Panatron Pte Ltd v Lee Cheow Lee [2000] SGHC 209, the High Court dismissed the company's claims and ruled in favor of the defendants, holding a director personally liable for fraudulent misrepresentation despite the corporate veil.
The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1933 v Comtech Corporation Pte Ltd and Another [2000] SGHC 207
In MCST Plan No 1933 v Comtech Corporation, the court dismissed the claim as premature, ruling that contractual indemnity clauses requiring notice and an opportunity to remedy defects must be satisfied before a party can sue for reimbursement of remedial costs.
United Overseas Bank Limited v Sim Marine Services Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 191
In United Overseas Bank Limited v Sim Marine Services Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Yap Chwee Khim v American Home Assurance Co and Others [2000] SGHC 185
The High Court dismissed the claim in Yap Chwee Khim v American Home Assurance Co, ruling that public policy bars beneficiaries from insurance proceeds linked to criminal conduct. The court also upheld the insurer's right to a post-mortem, ordering the plaintiff to pay 90% of legal costs.
Public Prosecutor v Loo Cheng Lip [2000] SGHC 173
In Public Prosecutor v Loo Cheng Lip [2000] SGHC 173, the court sentenced the accused to 15 years imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane for rape and outrage of modesty against his domestic maid, highlighting the judiciary's stern stance on protecting vulnerable domestic workers.
Focus Electronics Pte Ltd v Touch Universal Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 172
In Focus Electronics Pte Ltd v Touch Universal Pte Ltd [2000] SGHC 172, the High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' action, ruling that the defendants held a valid equitable interest in the property and were entitled to maintain their caveat, with costs awarded to the defendants.
CIC Video International v Forward International Singapore Pte Ltd and Another [2000] SGHC 15
In CIC Video International v Forward International Singapore Pte Ltd and Another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.