LITT
Try LITT free
Clarke Beryl Claire (as personal representative of the estate of Eugene Francis Clarke) and Another v SilkAir (Singapore) Pte Ltd and other actions (No 2) [2001] SGHC 324
In Clarke Beryl Claire v SilkAir (2001), the Singapore High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' claims, ruling they failed to prove the cause of the Flight MI 185 crash. Consequently, SilkAir was not barred from limiting its liability under the Warsaw Convention.
The Law Society of Singapore [2001] SGHC 322
Analysis of [2001] SGHC 322, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-10-22.
1.Panwell (Pte) Ltd; 2.Deogratias Pte Limited v Indian Bank [2001] SGHC 319
In 1.Panwell (Pte) Ltd; 2.Deogratias Pte Limited v Indian Bank, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Wu Tze Kok v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 304
In Wu Tze Kok v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
In the Matter of the Will of Samuel Emily @ Emily Samuel deceased v In the Matter of Order 80 of the Rules of Court [2001] SGHC 301
In In the Matter of the Will of Samuel Emily @ Emily Samuel deceased v In the Matter of Order 80 of the Rules of Court, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Arun Chandra Devan v Real Softwarre N V [2001] SGHC 300
In Arun Chandra Devan v Real Softwarre N V, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Tong Keng Meng @ Melvin Tong v 1. Inno-Pacific Holdings Limited; 2. Quah Su-Ling [2001] SGHC 295
In Tong Keng Meng @ Melvin Tong v 1. Inno-Pacific Holdings Limited; 2. Quah Su-Ling, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Lee Huay Kok v The Attorney General [2001] SGHC 292
In Lee Huay Kok v The Attorney General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Wong Jin Fah v L &M Prestressing Pte Ltd and Others (Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd (fka Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd and Another, Third Parties) [2001] SGHC 289
In Wong Jin Fah v L &M Prestressing Pte Ltd and Others (Liberty Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd (fka Citystate Insurance Pte Ltd and Another, Third Parties), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Yeo Yoke Mui v Kong Hoo (Private) Ltd and Another [2001] SGHC 28
Case Details * Citation: [2001] SGHC 28 * Case Number: Suit 1236/1997, RA 600001/01 * Decision Date: 08 February 2001 * Court: High Court of the Republic of Singapore * Coram: Judith Prakash J * Judgment
Ho Seng Lee Construction Pte Ltd v Nian Chuan Construction Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 277
In Ho Seng Lee Construction Pte Ltd v Nian Chuan Construction Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
1.Goh Kim Heong, 2.Fuu Siang Chaw, 3.Goh Sewi Tong, 4.Woo Kok Wah, 5.Goh Keng Hock v AT & J Company Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 270
In 1.Goh Kim Heong, 2.Fuu Siang Chaw, 3.Goh Sewi Tong, 4.Woo Kok Wah, 5.Goh Keng Hock v AT & J Company Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Re: Goh Chin Soon; Ex-parte: Overseas-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd [2001] SGHC 267
Analysis of [2001] SGHC 267, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-09-12.
Public Prosecutor v Ong Ker Seng [2001] SGHC 266
In Public Prosecutor v Ong Ker Seng, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Cheong Choon Bin v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 257
In Cheong Choon Bin v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Soh Lip Hwa and Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 254
Analysis of [2001] SGHC 254, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-09-03.
Wong Jin Fah v L&M Prestressing Pte Ltd and ors [2001] SGHC 250
In Wong Jin Fah v L&M Prestressing Pte Ltd and ors, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Chew Ah Kiat v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 244
In Chew Ah Kiat v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
AL Stainless Industries Pte Ltd v Wei Sin Construction Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 243
In AL Stainless Industries Pte Ltd v Wei Sin Construction Pte Ltd, the court ruled Wei Sin committed a repudiatory breach by improperly withholding payments. The court ordered payment of outstanding sums to AL Stainless, while dismissing claims for unpleaded retention sums and ordering damage assess
Moey Keng Kong v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 240
In Moey Keng Kong v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Wee Soon Kim v The Law Society of Singapore [2001] SGHC 232
In Wee Soon Kim v The Law Society of Singapore, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
DAEWOO Singapore Pte Ltd v CEL Tractors Private Limited [2001] SGHC 231
In DAEWOO Singapore Pte Ltd v CEL Tractors Private Limited [2001] SGHC 231, the Court of Appeal affirmed the approval of a scheme of arrangement, ruling it fair, reasonable, and bona fide, while confirming no coercion existed against minority creditors.
Ponggol Marina Pte Ltd v Central Provident Fund Board [2001] SGHC 229
In Ponggol Marina Pte Ltd v Central Provident Fund Board, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
International SOS Pte Ltd v Overton Mark Harold George [2001] SGHC 228
In International SOS Pte Ltd v Overton Mark Harold George, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.