LITT
Try LITT free
John While Springs (S) Pte Ltd and Another v Goh Sai Chuah Justin and Others [2001] SGHC 85
In John While Springs (S) Pte Ltd and Another v Goh Sai Chuah Justin and Others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Abdul Nasser bin Mahamood and Another [2001] SGHC 83
In Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Abdul Nasser bin Mahamood [2001] SGHC 83, the court acquitted the first accused after he rebutted the statutory presumption of knowledge, while the second accused was found guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
Credit Agricole Indosuez and Others v Rekasaran BI Limited and Another [2001] SGHC 81
The Singapore High Court dismissed an application by interveners to discharge a Mareva injunction, ruling that the request lacked good faith and appeared to be a collusive restructuring scheme. The court emphasized that interveners must demonstrate a bona fide interest to challenge such orders.
Public Prosecutor v Sabtu bin Abdullah alias Ramli bin Abdullah [2001] SGHC 8
In Public Prosecutor v Sabtu bin Abdullah alias Ramli bin Abdullah, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Ali Hashim and Others [2001] SGHC 78
In Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Ali Hashim [2001], the court sentenced two accused to death for drug trafficking but acquitted the third, ruling that his voluntary cooperation and credible testimony successfully raised reasonable doubt regarding his knowledge of the illicit contents.
Stratech Systems Limited v Guthrie Properties (S) Pte Ltd and Another [2001] SGHC 77
In Stratech Systems Limited v Guthrie Properties (S) Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 77, the High Court dismissed the plaintiff's passing off claim, ruling that Stratech failed to provide sufficient evidence of misrepresentation to satisfy the legal threshold.
Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft, Singapore Branch v Lim Kee Ban Heng Pte Ltd and Others [2001] SGHC 45
In Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft, Singapore Branch v Lim Kee Ban Heng Pte Ltd and Others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Re Sen Art Pte Ltd [2001] SGHC 41
Analysis of [2001] SGHC 41, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-03-02.
Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd (In Liquidation) v Tong Tien See and Others [2001] SGHC 382
In Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd v Tong Tien See [2001] SGHC 382, the High Court held defendants liable for $53.3 million for conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duty, granting proprietary relief and constructive trusts over assets in Singapore and Australia.
The "Feng Hang" [2001] SGHC 379
Analysis of [2001] SGHC 379, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-12-28.
Public Prosecutor v Chong Siew Chin [2001] SGHC 373
In Public Prosecutor v Chong Siew Chin, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Highway Video Pte Ltd & 2 Ors v Public Prosecutor (Lim Tai Wah) [2001] SGHC 371
In Highway Video Pte Ltd & 2 Ors v Public Prosecutor (Lim Tai Wah), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Teo Kian Leong v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 368
In Teo Kian Leong v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore (No 4) [2001] SGHC 367
In Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore (No 4), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Public Prosecutor v Mohd Rasiti bin Sooyat [2001] SGHC 356
In Public Prosecutor v Mohd Rasiti bin Sooyat, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Tan Boon Hai v Lee Ah Fong & Anor [2001] SGHC 355
In Tan Boon Hai v Lee Ah Fong [2001] SGHC 355, the Court of Appeal reinstated the Assistant Registrar's $70,000 costs award, ruling that the judge erred by considering irrelevant factors like social background and failing to account for overlapping legal work among multiple solicitors.
Pan Yee Ching v Wee Aik Joo [2001] SGHC 351
In Pan Yee Ching v Wee Aik Joo [2001] SGHC 351, the Court ordered an equal division of matrimonial assets, rejecting claims of impecuniosity. The ruling mandated the sale of the home, specific maintenance payments, and a set-aside for the son's education, emphasizing consistency in litigation.
AMS Securities (S) Pte Ltd v Thio Gwan Choon [2001] SGHC 35
The High Court dismissed Amsteel Securities' claim against Thio Gwan Choon, ruling that a director is not liable for losses from failed business strategies during a market crisis if they acted in good faith and without negligence, despite the outcome of their decisions.
Leaw Siat Chong v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 347
In Leaw Siat Chong v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
TS Video & Laser Pte Ltd v Lim Chee Yong [2001] SGHC 344
In TS Video & Laser Pte Ltd v Lim Chee Yong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Great Eastern Hotel (Pte) Ltd v Ng Yew Seng and Others (Ang Kho Thang, Third Party) [2001] SGHC 343
In Great Eastern Hotel (Pte) Ltd v Ng Yew Seng [2001] SGHC 343, the High Court rejected attempts to pierce the corporate veil, affirming the separate legal personality of the corporate entity while awarding a specific monetary judgment for outstanding rent against the company.
CEF (Capital Markets) Ltd and Another v Goh Chin Soon and Others [2001] SGHC 342
The High Court dismissed claims against financial advisors, ruling they owed no duty to warn a sophisticated party of obvious risks in share acquisitions without due diligence. The decision clarifies the limits of professional liability when clients are seasoned market players.
Phua Mong Seng @ Pan Mao Sheng Richard v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 337
In Phua Mong Seng @ Pan Mao Sheng Richard v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Madiaalakan s/o Muthusamy v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGHC 329
In Madiaalakan s/o Muthusamy v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.