LITTLITT Try LITT free
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural reset following consolidation order (19 June 2023)

The litigation, registered under CFI 033/2022, involves a complex dispute between the Claimants, Westford Trade Services DMCC and Westford Trade Services (UK) Ltd, and the Respondent, Dubai Insurance Co PSC.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — Consolidation of proceedings and dismissal of stay application (13 June 2023)

The litigation involves two distinct claims brought by Westford Trade Services DMCC and Westford Trade Services (UK) Ltd against Dubai Insurance Co PSC. The underlying dispute concerns the insurance obligations of the Defendant, Dubai Insurance Co, toward the Claimants.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural adjustments following liquidator document production (09 May 2023)

The litigation involves a claim brought by Westford Trade Services DMCC against Dubai Insurance Co PSC. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain to be fully ventilated in the public record, the procedural history indicates that the dispute is deeply intertwined with the financial…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — Non-party disclosure against liquidator (27 April 2023)

The dispute centers on the Defendant’s need to access internal records held by the liquidator of Phoenix Global DMCC to substantiate its defense against claims brought by Westford Trade Services DMCC and Westford Trade Services (UK) Ltd.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — Consent order regarding amendment of pleadings (18 April 2023)

The litigation between Westford Trade Services DMCC and Dubai Insurance Co PSC involves a dispute currently before the Court of First Instance. The procedural trajectory of the case necessitated a formal adjustment to the pleadings previously filed by the Defendant.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural consolidation and stay management (02 March 2023)

The litigation involves a complex interplay between two separate claims, CFI 033/2022 and CFI 060/2022, both involving Westford Trade Services DMCC and Dubai Insurance Co PSC. The dispute centers on the management of these parallel proceedings, specifically regarding whether the claims should be…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — Compelling specific disclosure of trade finance documentation (22 February 2023)

The lawsuit centers on a complex trade finance dispute involving multiple contracts and the movement of goods, specifically concerning the Claimant, Westford Trade Services DMCC, and the Defendant, Dubai Insurance Co PSC.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — Consent order regarding disclosure deadlines (17 January 2023)

The dispute centers on the procedural obligations of both parties to exchange documents as part of the pre-trial disclosure process. Following an initial Disclosure Order issued on 5 January 2023, the parties sought to adjust the timeline for compliance.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2022] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural amendment to document production deadlines (06 December 2022)

The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Westford Trade Services DMCC and Dubai Insurance Co PSC. While the substantive merits of the underlying claim remain outside the scope of this specific procedural order, the case has reached the critical stage of document production.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2022] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural adjustment of document production deadlines (23 November 2022)

The litigation involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Westford Trade Services DMCC, and the Defendant, Dubai Insurance Co PSC. While the substantive merits of the underlying claim remain outside the scope of this specific procedural order, the parties reached a consensus regarding the…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2022] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural amendment to document production timeline (18 November 2022)

The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Westford Trade Services DMCC, acting as the Claimant, and Dubai Insurance Co PSC, acting as the Defendant. While the specific substantive merits of the claim remain outside the scope of this procedural order, the case is registered under CFI…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2022] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural adjustment via consent order (16 November 2022)

The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes a procedural timeline adjustment regarding document production obligations between Westford Trade Services DMCC and Dubai Insurance Co PSC.

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read
uae-difc-cases

WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO PSC [2022] DIFC CFI 033 — Case Management Order (29 September 2022)

The litigation involves a commercial insurance dispute between Westford Trade Services DMCC (the Claimant) and Dubai Insurance Co PSC (the Defendant). While the specific underlying facts of the claim are not detailed in the procedural order, the case centers on trade credit insurance, as evidenced…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — Finality of litigation through notice of discontinuance (09 May 2023)

The litigation, registered as CFI 033/2017, involved Bankmed (SAL), operating within the DIFC under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), as the Claimant against a group of six Respondents.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2022] DIFC CFI 033 — Registrar dismisses appeal against case management directions (23 September 2022)

The dispute arises from ongoing litigation between Bankmed (SAL) and several defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Bargouthi (the Third Defendant).

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2022] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural dismissal of stay application (23 March 2022)

The underlying litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and the Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Bargouthi.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Extension of time for expert evidence on forgery (08 December 2021)

The litigation involves a banking claim brought by Bankmed (SAL), trading as Bankmed (Dubai), against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and five individual defendants. The core of the dispute centers on the enforceability of a Facility Agreement and a related Guarantee, which form the basis of the…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Adjournment of immediate judgment pending forgery investigation (11 October 2021)

The core of the dispute in CFI 033/2017 concerns the enforceability of a Facility Agreement (FA) and a First Demand Limited Personal Guarantee, both purportedly dated 22 December 2015.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Retrospective extension of time for procedural compliance (15 August 2021)

The underlying dispute in CFI 033/2017 involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and various individual co-defendants.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Amended order regarding legal representation and evidence filing timelines (04 May 2021)

The Registrar’s amended order clarifies the procedural latitude afforded to individual defendants in complex multi-party litigation, specifically regarding the appointment of barristers and the sequencing of evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Variation of stay pending police investigation (16 February 2021)

The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating in the DIFC as Bankmed (Dubai), pursuing claims against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and five individual defendants, including the Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Barguthi.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Temporary stay of proceedings pending police investigation (21 January 2021)

The dispute in CFI 033/2017 involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and various individuals. The litigation concerns substantial commercial claims brought by the bank.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — stay of proceedings pending police investigation (17 January 2021)

The litigation in CFI 033/2017 involves a claim brought by Bankmed (SAL), operating within the DIFC under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), against a primary corporate entity, Fast Telecom General Trading LLC, and five individual defendants.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Default judgment against Second Defendant (16 September 2020)

The lawsuit concerns a substantial commercial banking dispute initiated by Bankmed (SAL) against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and five individual defendants, including Ali Mohammed Salem Abu Adas.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read