LITT
Try LITT free
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural ultimatum on jurisdictional challenges (12 August 2020)
The lawsuit involves a claim brought by Bankmed (SAL) against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and five individual defendants, including Ali Mohammed Salem Abu Adas (the Second Defendant).
BANKMED v MOHAMMED JAWDAT AYESH MUSTAFA AL BARGUTHI [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Stay of expert proceedings pending criminal investigation (02 April 2020)
The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating within the DIFC, and a series of defendants, including the Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Barguthi. The core of the procedural conflict centers on the validity of certain documents—referred to as the "Disputed Documents"—which form…
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural extension of time for reply (17 March 2020)
The lawsuit involves Bankmed (SAL), trading in the DIFC under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), as the Claimant, and a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and various individuals, including the Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Barguthi.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Independence of Personal Guarantees from Arbitration Agreements (22 January 2020)
The Third Defendant, Mohammed Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Barguthi, sought to halt the litigation initiated by Bankmed (SAL) by arguing that the dispute was contractually bound to arbitration.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Judicial Officer order permitting withdrawal of legal representation (16 January 2020)
The underlying litigation, CFI-033-2017, involves a complex commercial dispute between the claimant, Bankmed (SAL), and a group of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and Ali Mohammed Salem Abu Adas.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural order regarding legal representation (23 December 2019)
This order formalizes the withdrawal of legal counsel from the record in a multi-party commercial dispute, clarifying the procedural requirements for firms seeking to cease representation of a defendant in the DIFC Courts.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADINGS [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Permission to appeal granted on compelling grounds (12 September 2019)
The underlying litigation, CFI-033-2017, involves Bankmed (SAL) and a series of defendants, including Fast Telecom General Tradings LLC and several individuals, among them the Fourth Defendant, Saif Saeed Sulaiman Mohamed Al Mazrouei.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADINGS [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Immediate judgment against guarantor (16 July 2019)
The litigation arises from a default on a USD 15,000,000 facility agreement entered into on 22 December 2015 between Bankmed (SAL) and Fast Telecom General Trading LLC. The facility was intended to finance the wholesale distribution of mobile handsets.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Permission to appeal default judgment (27 February 2019)
The underlying dispute involves Bankmed (SAL) seeking to enforce financial obligations against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individual defendants, including the Fifth Defendant, Ibrahim Saif Hormodi.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Permission to appeal granted on compelling grounds (13 January 2019)
The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating in the DIFC under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a group of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individual parties.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural dismissal of an out-of-time appeal (10 January 2019)
The dispute arises from a complex banking litigation involving Bankmed (SAL) and multiple defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individual parties, among them the Fifth Defendant, Ibrahim Saif Hormodi.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural relief for late filing of Statement of Defence (16 December 2018)
The dispute involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), as the Claimant against a series of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individuals.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — Procedural dismissal of default judgment application (10 December 2018)
The dispute arises from a commercial claim initiated by Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), against a group of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individuals.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — Setting aside a default judgment (19 November 2018)
The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), against a primary corporate entity, Fast Telecom General Trading LLC, and five individual defendants, including the fourth defendant, Saif Saeed Sulaiman Mohamed Al Mazrouei.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — Setting aside default judgment in the interest of justice (12 November 2018)
The dispute arose from a claim by Bankmed (SAL) against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individual defendants, including the Second Defendant, Ali Mohammed Salem Abu Adas, regarding unpaid debts.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural stay of defence filing (30 May 2018)
The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), operating within the DIFC under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a series of six defendants, led by Fast Telecom General Trading LLC. The case, registered as CFI-033-2017, concerns a banking claim brought by the Claimant against the primary corporate entity…
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — Setting aside default judgment against the third defendant (22 April 2018)
The litigation involves Bankmed (SAL), trading as Bankmed (Dubai), against a group of six defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individuals. The dispute arose from banking facilities provided by the Claimant, which led to the entry of a Default Judgment on 29 October…
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2018] DIFC CFI 033 — dismissal of application to set aside default judgment (14 January 2018)
The underlying dispute in CFI 033/2017 involves Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), and a series of defendants, including Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and several individuals, among them the fifth defendant, Ibrahim Saif Hormodi.
BANKMED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2017] DIFC CFI 033 — Default judgment for multi-million dollar banking debt (07 November 2017)
The dispute centered on a substantial financial claim initiated by Bankmed (SAL), operating under the trade name Bankmed (Dubai), against Fast Telecom General Trading LLC and five individual co-defendants.
ORION HOLDINGS OVERSEAS LIMITED v MOHAMMED ABU AL HAJ [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — Default judgment for USD 1.5M+ (11 July 2023)
The DIFC Court of First Instance confirms the procedural requirements for securing a default judgment against defendants served outside the jurisdiction in a long-standing liquidation claim.
ORION HOLDINGS OVERSEAS LIMITED v MOHAMMED ABU AL HAJ [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Amended Order of Discontinuance (26 December 2021)
The litigation in CFI 033/2015 involved a complex multi-party dispute initiated by three entities in liquidation: Orion Holdings Overseas Limited, Orion Global Financial Services LLC, and Orion Capital Limited.
ORION HOLDINGS OVERSEAS LIMITED v MOHAMMED ABU AL HAJ [2021] DIFC CFI 033 — Consent dismissal of complex liquidation litigation (16 May 2021)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes the settlement of long-standing litigation involving Orion entities in liquidation and Private Bank IHAG Zurich AG, effectively terminating all outstanding claims and cross-appeals.
ORION HOLDINGS OVERSEAS LIMITED v MOHAMMED ABU AL HAJ [2020] DIFC CFI 033 — Default judgment for USD 1.5M against non-responsive defendants (18 February 2020)
The lawsuit involves a substantial commercial claim initiated by two entities currently in liquidation, Orion Holdings Overseas Limited and Orion Capital Limited, against three defendants: Mohammed Abu Al Haj, Nidal Abdel Khaleq Abi Al Haj, and Privatebank IHAG Zurich AG.
ORION HOLDINGS OVERSEAS LIMITED v MOHAMMED ABU AL HAJ [2019] DIFC CFI 033 — Alternative service and extension of time order (24 March 2019)
The litigation involves three Claimants—Orion Holdings Overseas Limited, Orion Global Financial Services LLC, and Orion Capital Limited—all currently in liquidation. The Claimants sought to pursue claims against Mohammed Abu Al Haj, Nidal Abdel Khaleq Abu Al Haj, and Privatbank Ihag Zurich AG.