LITT
Try LITT free
IDBI BANK LIMITED v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2022] DIFC CFI 090 — procedural extension for Fifth Defendant (12 May 2022)
The litigation involves IDBI Bank Limited (DIFC Branch) as the Claimant, pursuing a claim against a series of corporate and individual defendants. The corporate respondents include Fast Telecom General Trading LLC, Fast Telecom Logistics FZE (now known as Elegance Mobile Solutions Logistics FZE),…
IDBI BANK v FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING [2022] DIFC CFI 090 — Alternative service by publication (02 March 2022)
IDBI Bank Limited (DIFC Branch) initiated proceedings against a complex network of corporate entities and individuals, specifically Fast Telecom General Trading LLC, Fast Telecom Logistics FZE (now Elegance Mobile Solutions Logistics FZE), Fast Link Mobile FZCO (now Fast Telecom Logistics FZE), and…
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH LIMITED [2025] DIFC CFI 089 — Expert evidence in share valuation disputes (16 April 2025)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the necessity of expert evidence in employment-related share entitlement claims, affirming that the potential for alternative damages claims justifies forensic accounting testimony even where specific performance is the primary relief.
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural extension for pleadings (01 November 2024)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Jeffrey Stone against Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited. While the specific underlying commercial merits remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the current procedural posture concerns the exchange of pleadings following the filing of a Defence and a…
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural extension for Defence and Counterclaim (14 October 2024)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Jeffrey Stone against two corporate entities, Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain to be fully ventilated in the public record, the current procedural posture concerns the Defendants'…
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — procedural extension for filing defence (03 October 2024)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Jeffrey Stone against two corporate entities, Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited. While the substantive merits of the claim remain pending before the Court of First Instance, the current procedural posture concerns the exchange of pleadings.
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural extension of time for defence (01 October 2024)
The litigation initiated by Jeffrey Stone against Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited, registered under case number CFI 089/2023, represents a high-stakes commercial dispute currently navigating the preliminary stages of the DIFC Court of First Instance.
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — procedural extension of time for defence (26 September 2024)
The litigation under case number CFI 089/2023 involves a claim brought by Jeffrey Stone against two corporate entities: Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited. While the substantive merits of the underlying claim remain pending, the current procedural posture of the case centers on the exchange of…
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural extension of time for filing defence (23 September 2024)
The litigation under case number CFI 089/2023 involves a claim brought by Jeffrey Stone against two corporate entities: Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited. While the substantive merits of the underlying claim remain to be fully ventilated in the public record, the procedural posture of the case…
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural extension of time for filing a defence (18 September 2024)
The litigation under case number CFI 089/2023 involves the claimant, Jeffrey Stone, and the respondents, Abhi Fintech and Abhi Limited. While the substantive merits of the underlying claim remain pending, the current procedural posture of the case concerns the formal exchange of pleadings.
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural extension of time for filing defence (16 September 2024)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Jeffrey Stone against two corporate entities, Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited. While the substantive merits of the underlying claim remain to be fully ventilated in subsequent proceedings, the current procedural posture concerns the fundamental stage…
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural extension of time for Defence (05 September 2024)
The litigation initiated by Jeffrey Stone against Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited, registered under case number CFI 089/2023, concerns a civil claim currently pending before the DIFC Court of First Instance.
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural extension of time for defence (23 August 2024)
The litigation involves a claim brought by Jeffrey Stone against two corporate entities, Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain pending, the current procedural posture of the case concerns the formal exchange of pleadings.
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — procedural extension of time for defence (09 August 2024)
The litigation under case number CFI 089/2023 involves a claim brought by Jeffrey Stone against two corporate entities: Abhi Fintech Limited and Abhi Limited. While the substantive merits of the underlying claim remain pending, the current procedural posture concerns the timeline for the Defendants…
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural consolidation of jurisdictional and joinder challenges (10 May 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes a procedural roadmap to resolve competing applications regarding jurisdiction, party joinder, and time extensions in a fintech-sector dispute.
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural timeline management via consent order (22 February 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes a procedural timetable for evidence submission in the ongoing dispute between Jeffrey Stone and Abhi Fintech Limited.
JEFFREY STONE v ABHI FINTECH [2024] DIFC CFI 089 — Procedural timeline for immediate judgment (07 February 2024)
A procedural Consent Order establishing the evidentiary deadline for the Defendant’s Application for Immediate Judgment in a fintech-sector dispute.
IDBI BANK v VISION METAL GENERAL TRADING FZC [2023] DIFC CFI 089 — Default judgment for USD 55 million (29 March 2023)
The dispute centers on a substantial commercial debt owed to IDBI Bank Limited by the Defendants, Vision Metal General Trading FZC and Mr. Vinod Kumar Goel. The Claimant sought recovery of a principal sum totaling USD 55,215,477.51.
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v AHMED KAZZAZ AND SHEILA KAZZAZ [2021] DIFC CFI 088 — Worldwide freezing injunction and asset disclosure order (03 November 2021)
The lawsuit concerns a significant financial dispute between Standard Chartered Bank and the Respondents, Ahmed Kazzaz and Sheila Kazzaz. The Applicant sought and obtained a worldwide freezing injunction to protect its interest in a claim valued at USD 1,141,040.
AL SOOR INVESTMENTS v JULIUS BAER [2023] DIFC CFI 088 — Procedural order for removal of solicitors (31 May 2023)
The dispute concerns the formal status of legal representation for the Claimants—Al Soor Investments LLC, Al Baraka Investments LLC, and Sari Investments LLC—in their ongoing litigation against Julius Baer (Middle East) Limited, Bank Julius Baer & Co Ltd, and individual respondents Mr.
Al Soor Investments v Julius Baer (Middle East) [2023] DIFC CFI 088 — Pre-action disclosure and the scope of Article 34 (19 May 2023)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the limits of RDC r. 28.48 and affirms the court’s inherent statutory power to order document production in extant proceedings.
AL SOOR INVESTMENTS v JULIUS BAER [2022] DIFC CFI 088 — Procedural dismissal for improper use of application notices (22 September 2022)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the mandatory procedural requirements for filing witness statements, emphasizing the necessity of using the SS1 Form for non-order-seeking submissions.
AL SOOR INVESTMENTS v JULIUS BAER [2022] DIFC CFI 088 — Procedural dismissal for improper use of application notice (09 September 2022)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the strict procedural requirement that an application notice must seek a substantive order, rejecting an attempt to use the application process for simple document filing.
AL SOOR INVESTMENTS v JULIUS BAER [2022] DIFC CFI 088 — procedural extension for pre-action disclosure (02 September 2022)
The litigation involves three claimant entities—Al Soor Investments LLC, Al Baraka Investments LLC, and Sari Investments LLC—seeking information from the respondents, Julius Baer (Middle East) Limited, Bank Julius Baer & Co Ltd, and individuals Mr. Emad Odeh and Mr. Nico Tschui.