LITT
Try LITT free
Ravi s/o Madasamy v Attorney-General and other matters [2017] SGHC 163
In Ravi s/o Madasamy v Attorney-General and other matters, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — President.
Tan Cheng Bock v Attorney-General [2017] SGHC 160
In Tan Cheng Bock v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Constitution.
Munusamy Ramarmurth v Public Prosecutor [2022] SGCA 70
In Munusamy Ramarmurth v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Constitutional Law — Accused person.
Xu Yuan Chen (alias Terry Xu) v Attorney-General [2022] SGCA 59
In Xu Yuan Chen (alias Terry Xu) v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Attorney-General, Constitutional Law — Equality before the law.
Iskandar bin Rahmat and others v Attorney-General and another [2022] SGCA 58
In Iskandar bin Rahmat and others v Attorney-General and another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Accused person, Constitutional Law — Fundamental liberties.
Nazeri bin Lajim v Attorney-General [2022] SGCA 55
In Nazeri bin Lajim v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law, Constitutional Law — Fundamental liberties.
Attorney-General v Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah [2022] SGCA 46
In Attorney-General v Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law, Constitutional Law — Fundamental liberties.
Panchalai a/p Supermaniam and another v Public Prosecutor [2022] SGCA 37
In Panchalai a/p Supermaniam and another v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure And Sentencing — Criminal references, Constitutional Law — Accused person.
Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General and other appeals [2022] SGCA 16
The Court of Appeal held that s 377A is unenforceable in its entirety due to the political compromise reached in 2007 and the representations made by the Attorney-General in 2018, which created a substantive legitimate expectation of non-enforcement.
Teo Ghim Heng v Public Prosecutor [2022] SGCA 10
In Teo Ghim Heng v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences, Constitutional Law — Attorney-General.
Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin v Attorney-General [2021] SGHC 31
In Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Judicial review, Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law.
Re Xu Yuan Chen (alias Terry Xu) [2021] SGHC 294
Analysis of [2021] SGHC 294, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2021-12-30.
Kanesan s/o Ramasamy v Public Prosecutor [2021] SGHC 269
In Kanesan s/o Ramasamy v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law.
Koh Rong Gui v Public Prosecutor [2021] SGHC 259
In Koh Rong Gui v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law, Constitutional Law — Judicial power.
The Online Citizen Pte Ltd v Attorney-General and another appeal and other matters [2021] SGCA 96
In The Online Citizen Pte Ltd v Attorney-General and another appeal and other matters, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Fundamental liberties, Statutory Interpretation — Constitutional provisions.
Ong Ming Johnson v Attorney-General and other matters [2020] SGHC 63
In Ong Ming Johnson v Attorney-General and other matters, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law, Constitutional Law — Fundamental liberties.
Gobi a/l Avedian and another v Attorney-General [2020] SGHC 31
conference (“PTC”) held on 4 February 2020 for OS 111/2020. The plaintiffs sought a declaration pursuant to O 15 r 16 of the Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed) (“ROC”) that a statement made by Mr Wong Woon Kwong (“Mr Wong”), who had appeared on behalf of the Attorney-General (“AG”) at the sa
Daniel De Costa Augustin v Public Prosecutor [2020] SGHC 112
In Daniel De Costa Augustin v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Criminal Motion, Constitutional Law — Equality before the law.
Daniel De Costa Augustin v Attorney-General [2020] SGCA 60
In Daniel De Costa Augustin v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review, Constitutional Law — Judicial review.
Saravanan Chandaram v Public Prosecutor and another matter [2020] SGCA 43
In Saravanan Chandaram v Public Prosecutor and another matter, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law, Criminal Law — Offences.
Syed Suhail Bin Syed Zin v Attorney General [2020] SGCA 122
In Syed Suhail Bin Syed Zin v Attorney General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Judicial review.
Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Fan Guohan Hai Jolovan) v Public Prosecutor [2020] SGCA 111
In Wham Kwok Han Jolovan (Fan Guohan Hai Jolovan) v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Fundamental liberties.
Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGHC 251
In Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal, Constitutional Law — Fundamental liberties.
HOWE WEN KHONG ROCKY & 6 Ors v ATTORNEY-GENERAL CHAMBERS
The Applicants lacked locus standi to challenge the constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty as they failed to demonstrate a violation of their personal constitutional rights or any special interest beyond that of the general public.