LITT
Try LITT free
Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor [2018] SGCA 70
In Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Judicial power, Courts and Jurisdiction — Court of Appeal.
Tan Cheng Bock v Attorney-General [2017] SGCA 50
In Tan Cheng Bock v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Constitution, Constitutional Law — President.
Prabagaran a/l Srivijayan v Public Prosecutor and other matters [2016] SGCA 67
In Prabagaran a/l Srivijayan v Public Prosecutor and other matters, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Remedies, Constitutional Law — Judicial Power.
Chijioke Stephen Obioha v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGCA 63
In Chijioke Stephen Obioha v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Fundamental Liberties, Abuse of Process.
Kho Jabing v Attorney-General [2016] SGCA 37
In Kho Jabing v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Res judicata — Abuse of process, Constitutional Law — Equality before the law.
Quek Hock Lye v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 7
In Quek Hock Lye v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law.
Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 53
The Public Prosecutor's decision not to grant a certificate of substantive assistance under s 33B(2)(b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act is reviewable on grounds of bad faith, malice, or unconstitutionality, but the applicant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case of reaso
Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 11
3 The Appellant’s sentence of death was held in abeyance as he brought a series of legal challenges against: (a) the constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty imposed by s 33 of the MDA read with the Second Schedule thereto (see Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor [2010] 3 SLR 489 (“Yong Vui Ko
Lim Meng Suang and another v Attorney-General and another appeal and another matter [2014] SGCA 53
In Lim Meng Suang and another v Attorney-General and another appeal and another matter, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law, Constitutional Law — Fundamental liberties.
Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v Attorney-General [2013] SGCA 39
In Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.
Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General [2012] SGCA 45
In Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of CIVIL PROCEDURE — Striking out, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Equal protection of the law.
Quek Hock Lye v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGCA 25
In Quek Hock Lye v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal, Constitutional Law — Attorney-General.
Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGCA 23
In Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Attorney-General, Constitutional Law — Equality before the law.
Ramalingam Ravinthran v Attorney-General [2012] SGCA 2
In Ramalingam Ravinthran v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Attorney-General, Constitutional Law — Equality before the law.
Chan Heng Kong and another v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGCA 18
In Chan Heng Kong and another v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law, Criminal Law.
Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General [2011] SGCA 9
In Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law, Constitutional Law.
Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor and another matter [2010] SGCA 20
In Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor and another matter, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law, Courts and Jurisdiction.
Eng Foong Ho and Others v Attorney-General [2009] SGCA 1
In Eng Foong Ho and Others v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Application for declaration, Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law.
Tan Chor Jin v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGCA 32
In Tan Chor Jin v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Accused person, Criminal Law — General exceptions.
Tee Soon Kay v Attorney-General [2007] SGCA 27
In Tee Soon Kay v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Constitution, Contract — Formation.
Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor [2004] SGCA 47
In Nguyen Tuong Van v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law, Constitutional Law — Fundamental liberties.
Thiruselvam s/o Nagaratnam v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGCA 13
In Thiruselvam s/o Nagaratnam v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Constitutional Law — Equal protection of the law.
Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade: Precedent to Prejudice
The overturning of Roe v. Wade has set a dangerous precedent, stripping women of reproductive rights and blurring the line between law and religious ideology. This decision threatens judicial stability, endangers lives, and undermines the core principles of liberty.