In this case court ruled that in times of war, the court may raise a business’s corporate veil and consider the nationality of its members and directors to assess if a company is an enemy. If the people in de facto (in fact) charge of the company’s affairs live in an enemy country, the corporation m

There is no absolute rule that extra judicial confession can never be the basis of conviction

Citation: AIR 1960 All 684 Date of Judgement: 29th August,

“National Sports Federations have full autonomy in determination of the

The Spanish Supreme Court has deemed a mandatory nudist policy in housing societies as discriminatory and violative of fundamental rights. The ruling states that homeowners and residents cannot be forced into nudity in communal spaces without their consent.

In the case of Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India & ors, the Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutional validity of The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018 and Section 18A. The case revolved around the troubled history of the treatment of ind

Confession given by accused in FIR is inadmissible according to

The Bench comprising of Justice L. Nageshwara Rao, Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice A.S. Bopanna said: “Needless to say, this basic protection of human decency and dignity extends to sex workers and their children, who, bearing the brunt of social stigma attached to their work, are removed to the frin

“Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur stricto sensu does not apply

“Misuse of Section 498-A of IPC” “No automatic arrest in

Right to Compensation is implicit in Article 300A of the Indian Constitution

“Mandatory installation of CCTV cameras in police stations” Special Leave

The post-Internet age has seen a clash between the Privacy

“Economic criteria cannot be the sole basis for determination of

Right to choose a life-partner is a fundamental right under Article 21.

The word ‘Tribunal’ is derived from the word ‘Tribunes’, which means ‘Magistrates of the Classical Roman Republic’.

The National Campaign Against Torture (NCAT) in its “India: Annual Report on Torture 2019” reported that a total of 1,731 persons died in custody during 2019, i.e. death of about five persons daily.[13] Out of which 1,606 deaths were reported in judicial custody and 125 deaths in police custody.

The law on admissibility of electronic evidence, has long been in a state of befuddlement. In the past the Supreme Court in different cases has iterated different positions on the issue, confounding the matter into much disarray. The Apex Court tried to finally settle the issue indefinitely though i

Case study of the Landmark case on Admissibility of Electronic Evidence.

The demise of Sushant Singh Rajput, Bollywood actor has created a surge of controversy and debate around the issue of suicide.

The Karnataka High Court issued a Bail order dated 19th May, 2020 wherein, it issued some controversial anti-migrant observations. Such observations were unsubstantiated, and seemingly inspired from the fake anti-migrant sentiment propaganda, widespread on social media. The case marks one of the fir

A chapter of Fundamental Duties was added under Article 51A by the Constitution (Forty-Second Amendment) Act, 1976, to compliment the Directive Principles of the State Policy under Part IV of the Constitution. All these duties are of constitutional consequence and legal significance.

By Mohammad Adil Ansari & Shivani Chauhan Abstract There is