Case Details
- Citation: [2001] SGHC 163
- Court: High Court of the Republic of Singapore
- Date: 2001-06-30
- Judges: Chao Hick Tin JA, L P Thean JA, Yong Pung How CJ
- Plaintiff/Applicant: Not specified
- Defendant/Respondent: Not specified
- Legal Areas: No catchword
- Statutes Referenced: Not specified
- Cases Cited: [2001] SGHC 160, [2001] SGHC 163
- Judgment Length: 1 page, 82 words
Summary
This brief judgment from the High Court of Singapore addresses the reassignment of the citation for a previous case, Re Lim Kiap Khee. The court notes that the citation for this case has been changed from [2001] SGHC 163 to [2001] 3 SLR 616; [2001] SGHC 160. The judgment provides no further details about the substance of the original case or the reasons for the citation change.
What Were the Facts of This Case?
The judgment does not specify any factual details about the original case of Re Lim Kiap Khee. It only states that the citation for this case has been reassigned, without providing any information about the nature of the case or the parties involved.
What Were the Key Legal Issues?
The judgment does not indicate what the key legal issues were in the original Re Lim Kiap Khee case. It is solely focused on the administrative matter of the citation change, without delving into the substantive legal questions that were addressed in the earlier judgment.
How Did the Court Analyse the Issues?
Since the judgment does not describe any specific legal issues or analysis, there is no information provided about how the court approached the case. The sole purpose of this judgment appears to be to note the change in citation for the previous Re Lim Kiap Khee decision.
What Was the Outcome?
The outcome of this judgment is simply the court's directive that the citation for the earlier Re Lim Kiap Khee case has been reassigned from [2001] SGHC 163 to [2001] 3 SLR 616; [2001] SGHC 160. No other orders or conclusions are provided.
Why Does This Case Matter?
Given the extremely limited information provided in this judgment, it is difficult to ascertain the broader legal significance or precedent value of the original Re Lim Kiap Khee case. The sole purpose of this judgment appears to be an administrative update to the citation, rather than any substantive analysis or conclusions.
For legal practitioners, the main relevance of this judgment is to note the change in citation for the earlier Re Lim Kiap Khee decision. This will ensure that researchers are able to accurately locate and reference the correct case law. However, without access to the full text of the original judgment, it is not possible to determine the specific legal principles or precedents established in that case.
Legislation Referenced
- None specified
Cases Cited
- [2001] SGHC 160
- [2001] SGHC 163
Source Documents
This article analyses [2001] SGHC 163 for legal research and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult the full judgment for the Court's complete reasoning.