LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

Lau Hwee Beng and Another v Ong Teck Ghee [2007] SGHC 90

In Lau Hwee Beng v Ong Teck Ghee [2007] SGHC 90, the High Court dismissed both summary judgment and striking-out applications. The court clarified that striking out is limited to the face of pleadings and noted the procedural disadvantage defendants face regarding summary judgment in Singapore.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Dante Yap Go v Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG [2007] SGHC 69

In Dante Yap Go v Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG [2007] SGHC 69, the High Court dismissed a discovery application, ruling that requests must be tethered to pleaded issues. The court rejected the 'fishing expedition' attempt, awarding $2,000 in costs due to procedural non-compliance.

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read
Singapore

New Health International, Inc v Tan Hoo Kim [2007] SGHC 62

In New Health International, Inc v Tan Hoo Kim [2007] SGHC 62, the High Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, ruling the defendant was not contractually liable. The court looked beyond invoices to the actual commercial relationship, emphasizing that objective conduct defines contractual roles.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Jaya Sarana Engineering Pte Ltd v GIB Automation Pte Ltd [2007] SGHC 49

In Jaya Sarana Engineering v GIB Automation [2007] SGHC 49, the High Court ruled that the plaintiff substantially performed its obligations. The court awarded the balance contract sum, rejecting most of the defendant's unsubstantiated counterclaims while allowing deductions for specific omissions.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Abe Isaac (Pte) Ltd v Marieta Montalba Pacudan and Another [2007] SGHC 46

In Abe Isaac (Pte) Ltd v Marieta Montalba Pacudan [2007] SGHC 46, the High Court partially allowed the plaintiff's claims for rental arrears and indemnity costs. The court ordered a partial refund of the security deposit to the defendant, noting the plaintiff's reliance on unreliable evidence.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Lim Ah Liang [2007] SGHC 34

In Public Prosecutor v Lim Ah Liang [2007] SGHC 34, the court imposed a life sentence, ruling that the accused's chronic psychiatric condition and high risk of re-offending necessitated custodial incapacitation to ensure public safety and consistent medical compliance.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

OTF Aquarium Farm (formerly known as Ong's Tropical Fish Aquarium & Fresh Flowers) (a firm) v Lian Shing Construction Co Pte Ltd (Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd, Third Party) [2007] SGHC 122

In OTF Aquarium Farm v Lian Shing Construction, the court held the defendant liable in negligence and nuisance for the death of 31 arowanas due to flood water ingress. The court rejected the force majeure defence, ruling that monsoon rainfall is foreseeable, and ordered damages to be assessed.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (formerly known as Singapore Cable Vision Ltd) [2007] SGHC 119

In Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd (formerly known as Singapore Cable Vision Ltd), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·3 min read
Singapore

TV v TW [2007] SGHC 113

Case Details * Citation: [2007] SGHC 113 * Case Number: DT 3079/2004 * Decision Date: 17 July 2007 * Court: High Court of Singapore * Coram: Woo Bih Li J * Judgment Delivered By: Woo Bih Li

Sushant Shukla· ·12 min read
Singapore

The Vasiliy Golovnin [2006] SGHC 247

In The Vasiliy Golovnin [2006] SGHC 247, the High Court set aside a warrant of arrest due to a lack of full and frank disclosure. However, the Court denied the defendant's claim for damages, ruling that the plaintiffs acted without mala fides or gross negligence in their application.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Burwill Trading Pte Ltd v Panwah Steel Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 234

In Burwill Trading Pte Ltd v Panwah Steel Pte Ltd [2005] SGHC 234, the High Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $1,394,953.65 in damages for breach of steel supply agreements and dismissing the defendant's counterclaim.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Lee Harith Gary (alias Lee Cheng Thiam) [2004] SGHC 79

In Public Prosecutor v Lee Harith Gary [2004] SGHC 79, the High Court rejected the defense of suicide, finding the accused guilty of murder. The court ruled that the accused pushed the victim to her death following a history of harassment, resulting in a mandatory death sentence.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Creative Technology Ltd v Cosmos Trade-Nology Pte Ltd and Another [2004] SGHC 5

In Creative Technology Ltd v Cosmos Trade-Nology, the Singapore High Court held the defendants liable for trademark infringement and passing off. The court rejected mechanical profit calculations, awarding USD 150,000 in total damages based on a fair assessment of lost profits and reputational harm.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Ong Zern Chern Philip v Wong Siang Meng [2004] SGHC 256

In Ong Zern Chern Philip v Wong Siang Meng [2004] SGHC 256, the High Court awarded damages for a motor vehicle accident, ruling that loss of earning capacity should be assessed 'in the round' rather than through strict mathematical formulas, totaling $8,352.40 in special damages plus general damages

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Ang Kuang Hoe v Chia Chor Yew [2004] SGHC 229

In Ang Kuang Hoe v Chia Chor Yew [2004] SGHC 229, the court awarded damages for personal injury with 50% liability apportionment. Key rulings addressed the subrogation of medical expenses via the Public Trustee and established strict evidentiary requirements for special damages and loss of earning c

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Ang Siam Hua v Teo Cheng Hoe [2004] SGHC 147

In Ang Siam Hua v Teo Cheng Hoe [2004] SGHC 147, the High Court awarded $344,632.73 in damages for a motor vehicle accident. The court carefully assessed special damages and loss of earning capacity, rejecting speculative medical costs and addressing the impact of tax under-declaration on claims.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Eversendai Engineering Pte Ltd v Synergy Construction Pte Ltd (Ministry of Education, Third Party) [2004] SGHC 129

In Eversendai Engineering Pte Ltd v Synergy Construction Pte Ltd [2004] SGHC 129, the Court dismissed an attachment order, ruling it void under the Companies Act. The decision reinforces the pari passu principle, preventing individual creditors from gaining unfair preference over others during insol

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Salleh Bin Awang and Another v Zakiah Bte Arshad [2003] SGHC 90

In Salleh Bin Awang and Another v Zakiah Bte Arshad, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v K S [2003] SGHC 9

In Public Prosecutor v K S, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Indian Bank v Greenseas Shipping Co Pte Ltd [2003] SGHC 83

In Indian Bank v Greenseas Shipping Co Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Hi-Amp Engineering Pte Ltd v Technicdelta Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd [2003] SGHC 316

In Hi-Amp Engineering v Technicdelta, the High Court awarded the plaintiff $361,907.12 for variation works but penalized them with a 50% reduction in legal costs due to inconsistent and poorly presented claim figures. The defendant's counterclaim was dismissed in its entirety.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Pok Raymond [2003] SGHC 18

In Public Prosecutor v Pok Raymond, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v I and Another [2003] SGHC 166

In Public Prosecutor v I and Another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.

Sushant Shukla· ·4 min read
Singapore

Mohammad Kassim Bin Sapil v Quah Lai Tee and Others [2003] SGHC 118

In Mohammad Kassim Bin Sapil v Quah Lai Tee [2003] SGHC 118, the High Court held the 3rd Defendant solely liable for the Plaintiff's injuries. The court ruled that the stationary lorry was not an operative cause, emphasizing that the driver's negligent handling in adverse weather was the sole cause.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read