Case Details
- Citation: [2001] SGHC 267
- Court: High Court of the Republic of Singapore
- Date: 2001-09-12
- Judges: Lai Kew Chai J
- Plaintiff/Applicant: -
- Defendant/Respondent: -
- Legal Areas: No catchword
- Statutes Referenced: -
- Cases Cited: [2001] SGHC 264, [2001] SGHC 267
- Judgment Length: 1 page, 75 words
Summary
This brief judgment from the High Court of Singapore addresses a procedural matter in a bankruptcy case. The court reassigns the citation for an earlier judgment in the same case, [2001] SGHC 264, to two new citations: [2001] 3 SLR(R) 145 and [2001] 4 SLR 272. The court provides no further details about the substance of the case or the reasons for this reassignment.
What Were the Facts of This Case?
The judgment does not provide any details about the facts or background of the underlying bankruptcy case, referred to as Bankruptcy No 600384 of 2001. The only information given is that this is a procedural ruling related to the citation of an earlier judgment in the same case, [2001] SGHC 264.
What Were the Key Legal Issues?
The sole legal issue addressed in this judgment is the reassignment of the citation for the earlier judgment [2001] SGHC 264. The court states that this citation has been "reassigned" to two new citations: [2001] 3 SLR(R) 145 and [2001] 4 SLR 272. However, the judgment does not explain the reasons or legal basis for this reassignment.
How Did the Court Analyse the Issues?
The court's analysis in this judgment is extremely brief, consisting of only a single sentence stating the fact of the citation reassignment. There is no discussion of the legal principles or reasoning underlying this decision. The judgment provides no insight into why the court determined that the earlier citation should be changed, or what factors were considered in making this determination.
What Was the Outcome?
The sole outcome of this judgment is the reassignment of the citation for the earlier judgment [2001] SGHC 264 to the new citations [2001] 3 SLR(R) 145 and [2001] 4 SLR 272. The judgment does not indicate whether this change has any substantive impact on the earlier ruling or the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings.
Why Does This Case Matter?
This judgment is of limited practical significance, as it addresses only a narrow procedural issue regarding the citation of an earlier ruling. Without any details about the underlying bankruptcy case or the reasons for the citation change, it is difficult to discern the broader legal significance or precedential value of this decision.
However, the case does highlight the importance of accurate case citation, as courts may periodically reassign citations to ensure consistency and clarity in the legal record. Practitioners should be aware that citation information for past judgments may change over time, and should verify the current citation when relying on or referring to prior rulings.
Legislation Referenced
- -
Cases Cited
Source Documents
This article analyses [2001] SGHC 267 for legal research and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult the full judgment for the Court's complete reasoning.