LITT
Try LITT free
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2021] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for amendment of pleadings (04 March 2021)
The litigation in CFI 037/2017 involves a long-standing dispute initiated by the Claimant, Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala, against Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair, Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedrath, and Rag Foodstuff Trading.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2020] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for supplemental expert evidence (18 November 2020)
The litigation, registered under CFI 037/2017, involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala, and the Defendants, Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair, Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedrath, and Rag Foodstuff Trading LLC.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2020] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for expert evidence timeline (30 August 2020)
The litigation, registered under case number CFI 037/2017, involves a claim brought by Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala against three defendants: Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair, Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedrath, and Rag Foodstuff Trading LLC.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2020] DIFC CFI 037 — procedural timeline adjustment via consent order (30 June 2020)
The litigation, registered as CFI 037/2017, involves a dispute between the Claimant, Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala, and the Respondents, Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair, Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedrath, and Rag Foodstuff Trading.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2020] DIFC CFI 037 — procedural timeline adjustment (04 June 2020)
The litigation in CFI 037/2017 involves a complex commercial dispute where the parties have sought multiple variations to the original Case Management Conference (CMC) Order dated 5 September 2019.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2020] DIFC CFI 037 — Procedural timeline extension via consent order (30 April 2020)
The dispute between Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala and the defendants, Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair, Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedrath, and Rag Foodstuff Trading LLC, centers on a complex litigation process that necessitated multiple adjustments to the original Case Management Conference (CMC) Order dated 5…
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2020] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order regarding procedural timelines (02 April 2020)
The dispute, registered under CFI 037/2017, involves a complex set of claims requiring extensive evidentiary preparation. To ensure the orderly progression of the trial, the parties sought to modify the existing Case Management Conference (CMC) Order dated 5 September 2019.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH NAIR [2020] DIFC CFI 037 — Denial of de novo review of Judicial Officer order (30 January 2020)
This order addresses the procedural limitations of seeking a de novo review of a Judicial Officer’s decision within the DIFC Court of First Instance, reinforcing the finality of interlocutory case management rulings.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH NAIR [2020] DIFC CFI 037 — Judicial Officer ruling on document production and witness statements (08 January 2020)
The litigation involves a dispute between the Claimant, Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala, and the Defendants, Soman Kuniyath Nair, Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedath, and Rag Foodstuff Trading LLC.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2019] DIFC CFI 037 — Case management and procedural directions (10 September 2019)
The litigation concerns a commercial dispute between the Claimant, Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala, and the Respondents, Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair, Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedath, and RAG Foodstuff Trading LLC.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2019] DIFC CFI 037 — Amendment of pleadings and jurisdictional limits (17 April 2019)
The Court of First Instance addresses the limits of judicial discretion in allowing amendments to pleadings when new claims fall outside the scope of the parties' underlying Sale and Purchase Agreement.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2018] DIFC CFI 037 — Costs sanctions for procedural inefficiency (02 May 2018)
The litigation involved a claim brought by Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala against Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair, Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedath, and RAG Foodstuff Trading LLC. The underlying dispute, which necessitated subsequent procedural interventions, centered on the Claimant’s attempt to amend his…
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2018] DIFC CFI 037 — Procedural costs following amendment of pleadings (13 March 2018)
The litigation, filed under case number CFI-037-2017, involves a commercial dispute brought by the Claimant, Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala, against three defendants: Soman Kuniyat Kunjunni Nair, Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedath, and the entity RAG Foodstuff Trading LLC.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2018] DIFC CFI 037 — Judicial scrutiny of prolix pleadings in SPA indemnity disputes (15 February 2018)
The litigation centers on a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 8 February 2016, through which the Claimant sought to recover significant sums injected into the third defendant, RAG Foodstuff Trading LLC.
Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala v Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair [2017] DIFC CFI 037 — Mandatory injunctions and the high threshold for specific performance (10 October 2017)
The litigation centers on a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) concerning the acquisition of RAG Foodstuff Trading LLC. The Claimant, Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala, sought a mandatory injunction to compel the transfer of shares and his reinstatement as manager of the company, or alternatively, the appointment…
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2017] DIFC CFI 037 — Procedural sanctions for late filings (01 October 2017)
The dispute centered on the Claimant’s failure to adhere to the court-mandated timeline for submitting his Reply to Defence and Counterclaim, as well as the accompanying reply evidence.
ILYAS GAFFAR SABOOWALA v SOMAN KUNIYATH KUNJUNNI NAIR [2017] DIFC CFI 037 — Procedural adjournment and interim relief management (27 September 2017)
The DIFC Court of First Instance addresses the procedural fallout of a failed return date hearing, imposing significant costs and strict filing deadlines to preserve the integrity of a commercial dispute involving RAG Foodstuff Trading LLC.
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order and trial vacation (12 December 2016)
The litigation initiated by William Daniel Milligan against Al Mojil Investment Limited under case number CFI 037/2015 concerned a commercial claim brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance.
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Procedural variation of trial timelines (24 October 2016)
The litigation involves a claim brought by William Daniel Milligan against Al Mojil Investment Limited. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain outside the scope of this specific procedural order, the case reached a critical juncture in late 2016 where the parties sought to…
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — procedural amendment and the avoidance of mini-trials (03 October 2016)
The dispute centers on the Claimant’s attempt to recover outstanding salary, notice pay, and end-of-service gratuity following the termination of his employment. Initially, the Claimant pursued these claims against a different entity, MMG, but subsequently discontinued that action and sought to…
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for counterclaim discontinuance (29 August 2016)
The litigation under case number CFI 037/2015 involved a primary claim brought by William Daniel Milligan against Al Mojil Investment Limited. While the specific underlying commercial merits of the main claim remain outside the scope of this procedural order, the case reached a critical juncture…
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Case Management Order (03 August 2016)
The litigation concerns a conflict between the Claimant, William Daniel Milligan, and the Defendant, Al Mojil Investment Limited. The current procedural posture is defined by two opposing applications that threaten the viability of the claim.
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for discontinuance (20 July 2016)
The litigation, registered under CFI 037/2015, involved William Daniel Milligan as the Claimant and two entities, Al Mojil Investment Limited and Mohammed Al-Mojil Group, as the First and Second Defendants, respectively.
WILLIAM DANIEL MILLIGAN v AL MOJIL INVESTMENT [2016] DIFC CFI 037 — Consent order for stay of proceedings (06 April 2016)
The litigation involves William Daniel Milligan as the Claimant against Al Mojil Investment Limited (First Defendant) and Mohammed Al-Mojil Group (Second Defendant). While the underlying substantive claims are not detailed in the consent order, the procedural history indicates a significant…