LITTLITT Try LITT free
uae-difc-cases

SOL INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES v RAVIOLI & CO TRADITIONAL ITALIAN PASTIFICIO [2021] DIFC CFI 055 — Consent order for procedural stay (24 November 2021)

The litigation involves a claim brought by SOL International Properties Limited against Ravioli & Co Traditional Italian Pastificio Ltd, a company currently in liquidation. While the substantive merits of the underlying commercial dispute remain shielded by the procedural nature of the recent…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

SOL INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES v RAVIOLI & CO TRADITIONAL ITALIAN PASTIFICIO [2021] DIFC CFI 055 — Consent order vacating directions hearing (14 November 2021)

The lawsuit, registered under CFI 055/2021, involves a commercial dispute brought by the Claimant, SOL International Properties Limited, against two Defendants: Ravioli & Co Traditional Italian Pastificio Ltd and Shahab Haider.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

SOL International Properties v Ravioli & Co Traditional Italian Pastificio [2021] DIFC CFI 055 — Procedural extension via consent order (07 October 2021)

The litigation under case number CFI 055/2021 involves the Claimant, SOL International Properties Limited, and two named Defendants: Ravioli & Co Traditional Italian Pastificio Ltd and Shahab Haider.

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2026] DIFC CFI 055 — Procedural extension for costs assessment (04 March 2026)

The litigation between NS Investments Limited and Ajay Sethi reached a stage where the recovery of legal costs became the primary point of contention. Following a judgment in 2023, the Court issued an order in early 2025 requiring the Claimant to pay 50% of the Defendant’s legal costs.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2026] DIFC CFI 055 — Clarifying cost liabilities through order variation (12 February 2026)

The DIFC Court of First Instance exercises its inherent jurisdiction to rectify drafting ambiguities in a prior Consent Order and Judgment, ensuring that cost awards accurately reflect the parties' underlying settlement intentions regarding principal and interest claims.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2026] DIFC CFI 055 — Interim payment of legal costs on account (07 February 2026)

The dispute centered on the Defendant’s attempt to recover a portion of legal fees incurred throughout the protracted litigation of the Part 7 Claim. Following the conclusion of the main proceedings, where the Defendant emerged successful in every application—including those reaching the Court of…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2025] DIFC CFI 055 — Interim costs payment order (07 February 2025)

The underlying litigation, initiated by a Part 7 Claim in June 2020, reached a critical juncture regarding the recovery of legal fees incurred by the Defendant, Ajay Sethi. Following the conclusion of the substantive proceedings and subsequent failed appeals by the Claimant, NS Investments, the…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS Investments v Ajay Sethi [2024] DIFC CFI 055 — Dismissal of appeal regarding ultra vires loan agreements (15 May 2024)

The dispute originated from a loan agreement between the Claimant, a Jebel Ali Free Zone (JAFZA) registered entity, and the Defendant, an Indian national residing in the UAE. The Claimant sought to enforce the repayment of a loan that carried a high rate of interest.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS Investment v Ajay Sethi [2020] DIFC CFI 055 — Nullity of loan agreements due to regulatory illegality (27 September 2023)

The DIFC Court of First Instance confirms that offshore entities cannot enforce loan agreements in the DIFC if the underlying credit activities violate onshore UAE financial licensing requirements and JAFZA regulations.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2023] DIFC CFI 055 — Consent order resolving a USD 1.29 million loan dispute (15 June 2023)

The litigation centered on a financial recovery claim initiated by NS Investments Limited against the defendant, Ajay Sethi. The dispute arose from an outstanding debt obligation, specifically a principal loan amount that remained unpaid, prompting the claimant to seek judicial intervention within…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2023] DIFC CFI 055 — Discontinuance of counterclaim proceedings (12 June 2023)

The litigation between NS Investments Limited and Ajay Sethi, filed under case number CFI 055/2020, represents a complex commercial dispute within the DIFC Court of First Instance. While the primary claim initiated by NS Investments Limited remains a matter of record, the specific procedural focus…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2023] DIFC CFI 055 — Procedural extension for document production (14 February 2023)

The litigation under case number CFI 055/2020 involves a commercial claim brought by NS Investments Limited against the defendant, Ajay Sethi. While the specific underlying merits of the claim remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the matter has reached a stage where the parties are actively…

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2023] DIFC CFI 055 — Case Management Order (19 January 2023)

This Case Management Order establishes the procedural roadmap for the resolution of CFI 055/2020, setting definitive deadlines for disclosure, witness evidence, and trial preparation.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2022] DIFC CFI 055 — Procedural refinement of pleadings via consent order (05 September 2022)

The litigation involves a commercial dispute between the Claimant, NS Investments Limited, and the Defendant, Ajay Sethi. While the underlying substantive claims remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the current procedural posture of the case reflects a mutual recognition by both parties that…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS Investments Limited v Ajay Sethi [2022] DIFC CFI 055 — Immediate judgment application dismissed due to triable issues of fact (05 April 2022)

The litigation centers on a loan agreement dated 2 July 2019, under which the Claimant, NS Investments Limited, sought to recover a principal sum of USD 1,298,977, alongside accrued interest and default interest.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2022] DIFC CFI 055 — assessment of costs following a failed stay application (10 February 2022)

The litigation between NS Investments Limited and Mr Ajay Sethi concerns a substantive dispute brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance. While the underlying merits of the claim remain the primary focus of the proceedings, the immediate procedural friction arose from the defendant’s attempt…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS INVESTMENTS v AJAY SETHI [2021] DIFC CFI 055 — Permission to appeal default judgment (18 August 2021)

The DIFC Court of First Instance grants permission to appeal a default judgment, signaling a potential judicial pivot regarding the mandatory nature of filing an acknowledgment of service.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

NS Investments v Ajay Sethi [2021] DIFC CFI 055 — Default judgment set aside application denied (29 April 2021)

The DIFC Court of First Instance affirms the strict procedural requirements for challenging default judgments, rejecting a defendant’s attempt to vacate a USD 1.29 million award based on unsubstantiated claims of usury and procedural irregularity.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES v NATIONAL GULF CONSTRUCTIONS [2024] DIFC CFI 055 — Consent order vacating prior judgments (14 February 2024)

The litigation involved a complex financial dispute between the Claimant, Caterpillar Financial Services (Dubai) Limited, and the Defendants, National Gulf Constructions LLC and National Gulf Investment LLC.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES v NATIONAL GULF CONSTRUCTIONS [2022] DIFC CFI 055 — Lifting a precautionary stay of execution (12 October 2022)

The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the limited scope of Ruler of Dubai Resolution No. 13 of 2020, confirming that a precautionary stay of execution on a USD 11.2 million judgment was unwarranted.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES v NATIONAL GULF CONSTRUCTIONS [2022] DIFC CFI 055 — Amendment of service instructions (31 August 2022)

The dispute concerns a long-standing claim initiated by Caterpillar Financial Services (Dubai) Limited against National Gulf Constructions LLC and National Gulf Investment LLC. The core of the procedural issue involved the efficacy of service of documents, specifically regarding the electronic mail…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES v NATIONAL GULF CONSTRUCTIONS [2022] DIFC CFI 055 — Alternative service via email (12 August 2022)

The dispute arises from an ongoing litigation matter, CFI 055/2018, involving Caterpillar Financial Services (Dubai) Limited as the Claimant and two entities, National Gulf Constructions LLC and National Gulf Investment LLC, as the Defendants.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES v NATIONAL GULF CONSTRUCTIONS [2020] DIFC CFI 055 — Judicial Officer grants withdrawal of legal representation (24 November 2020)

The litigation, registered under CFI 055/2018, involves a claim brought by Caterpillar Financial Services (Dubai) Limited against two corporate entities: National Gulf Constructions LLC and National Gulf Investment LLC. The dispute centers on the procedural status of the Defendants' legal counsel.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES v NATIONAL GULF CONSTRUCTIONS [2018] DIFC CFI 055 — Enforcement of loan agreements and security realization (27 October 2020)

The dispute arose from a series of loan agreements and corporate guarantees entered into between Caterpillar Financial Services (Dubai) Limited (the Claimant) and the Defendants, National Gulf Constructions LLC and National Gulf Investment LLC.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read