LITT
Try LITT free
SER KIM KOI v GTMS CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD & 2 Ors
In SER KIM KOI v GTMS CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD & 2 Ors, the addressed issues of .
NG KOON YEE MICKEY v MAH SAU CHEONG
In NG KOON YEE MICKEY v MAH SAU CHEONG, the court ruled that the plaintiffs' conduct set time at large, precluding liquidated damages from 16 January 2009. The court ordered specific performance but dismissed the alternative claim for general damages due to a failure to prove unreasonable delay.
SAIS LIMITED & Anor v MICHAEL JON HARDMAN & Anor
In SAIS LIMITED & Anor v MICHAEL JON HARDMAN & Anor, the addressed issues of .
VYQ v VYP
In VYQ v VYP, the addressed issues of .
WEI HO-HUNG v LYU JUN
In WEI HO-HUNG v LYU JUN, the addressed issues of .
UD TRADING GROUP HOLDING PTE. LTD. v TA PRIVATE CAPITAL SECURITY AGENT LIMITED & Anor
Case Details * Citation: [2021] SGHCR 10 * Case Number: HC/S 624 of 2020; HC/SUM 4702 of 2021 * Decision Date: 10 December 2021 * Court: General Division of the High Court of the
CLS v CLT
In CLS v CLT, the addressed issues of .
GRASSLAND EXPRESS & TOURS PTE LTD & Anor v M. PRIYATHARSINI & 5 Ors
In GRASSLAND EXPRESS & TOURS PTE LTD & Anor v M. PRIYATHARSINI & 5 Ors, the addressed issues of .
MICHAEL JOSEPH MILLSOPP v THEN FENG
In MICHAEL JOSEPH MILLSOPP v THEN FENG, the addressed issues of .
THE SUBSIDIARY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION NO. 01 - STRATA TITLE PLAN NO. 4355 v JANAED & Anor
In THE SUBSIDIARY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION NO. 01 - STRATA TITLE PLAN NO. 4355 v JANAED & Anor, the addressed issues of .
LEOW PENG YAM v ARYALL KANG JIA DIAN
In LEOW PENG YAM v ARYALL KANG JIA DIAN, the addressed issues of .
VXF v VXE
In VXF v VXE, the addressed issues of .
KASHMIRE MERKANEY v NCL HOUSING PTE LTD
In KASHMIRE MERKANEY v NCL HOUSING PTE LTD, the addressed issues of .
TAY YAK PING & Anor v TAY NGUANG KEE SERENE
The court ruled in favor of the defendants, confirming SWS operated as a three-way partnership. It ordered the liquidation of seven properties to be shared equally, rejecting claims for unequal profit distribution and ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the hearing.
YONG KHONG YOONG MARK & 2 Ors v TING CHOON MENG & Anor
In YONG KHONG YOONG MARK & 2 Ors v TING CHOON MENG & Anor, the addressed issues of .
YEE HENG KHAY (ROGER) v ANGLISS SINGAPORE PTE LTD
In YEE HENG KHAY (ROGER) v ANGLISS SINGAPORE PTE LTD, the addressed issues of .
IVY NG SOH PENG v SOLUTION AIRCON & ENGRG PTE. LTD.
In IVY NG SOH PENG v SOLUTION AIRCON & ENGRG PTE. LTD., the addressed issues of .
METUPALLE VASANTHAN & Anor v LOGANATHAN RAVISHANKAR & Anor
In METUPALLE VASANTHAN & Anor v LOGANATHAN RAVISHANKAR & Anor, the addressed issues of .
ELIAS XANTHOPOULOS v ROTATING OFFSHORE SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors
The High Court ruled that refusing to distribute dividends or wind up a company after its commercial purpose ceased constitutes minority oppression under Section 216. The court ordered a buyout of the plaintiff's 30% stake at net asset value, rejecting minority discounts and set-offs.
TAN CHIN HOCK v TEO CHER KOON & Anor
In TAN CHIN HOCK v TEO CHER KOON & Anor, the addressed issues of .
LAU KEUK LING WILLIAM IGNATIUS v CHAN CHUN SHENG, GARY
In LAU KEUK LING WILLIAM IGNATIUS v CHAN CHUN SHENG, GARY, the addressed issues of .
LACHMAN'S EMPORIUM PTE LTD v KANG TIEN KUAN
In LACHMAN'S EMPORIUM PTE LTD v KANG TIEN KUAN, the addressed issues of .
PNG HOCK LENG v AXA INSURANCE PTE LTD
In PNG HOCK LENG v AXA INSURANCE PTE LTD, the addressed issues of .
PHUA SENG HUA & 2 Ors v PETER KWEE SENG CHIO & Anor
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, awarding $343,020.61 in damages and $105,000 in costs. It affirmed that claims for aggravated and punitive damages must be specifically pleaded, rejecting attempts to broaden assessment inquiries to include unpleaded claims.