LITT
Try LITT free
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2015] DIFC CFI 026 — Leave to appeal granted on public importance grounds (16 February 2015)
The litigation between Standard Chartered Bank and Investment Group Private Limited, filed under case number CFI-026-2014, centers on a high-stakes banking dispute that reached a critical juncture regarding the finality of interlocutory orders.
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v INVESTMENT GROUP PRIVATE [2015] DIFC CFI 026 — The rejection of forum non conveniens in inter-Emirate disputes (15 January 2015)
The dispute arose from two separate loan agreements and a related security instrument, which led Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) to initiate proceedings in the DIFC Courts. The claimant sought to recover substantial sums owed by the defendant, Investment Group Private Limited (IGPL), under these…
MR PHILIPPE CHOQUE v MONDIAL [2013] DIFC CFI 026 — Jurisdictional challenge regarding non-DIFC financial services (17 March 2014)
The dispute arose from an investment in a five-year retirement plan, specifically the "Foundations Program Life Policy," which the Claimant, Mr. Philippe Choque, entered into in March 2006 based on recommendations from the First Defendant, Mondial (Dubai) LLC.
MUSTAFA AL HENDI v DUBAI AEROSPACE ENTERPRISE [2014] DIFC CFI 026 — Consent order discontinuing employment dispute (20 May 2014)
The litigation initiated by Mustafa Al Hendi against Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE) Limited under case number CFI 026/2012 represented a formal legal challenge brought before the DIFC Courts.
MUSTAFA AL HENDI v DUBAI AEROSPACE ENTERPRISE [2014] DIFC CFI 026 — Consent order staying proceedings (29 April 2014)
The litigation initiated under case number CFI 026/2012 involved a complex dispute between the Claimant, Mustafa Al Hendi, and the Respondent, Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE). While the specific underlying causes of action were not detailed in the public record of the final order, the case…
MUSTAFA AL HENDI v DUBAI AEROSPACE ENTERPRISE [2013] DIFC CFI 026 — procedural directions for pre-trial evidence and pleadings (12 December 2013)
The Claimant, Mustafa Al Hendi, sought a court order to strike out specific additional documents and witness statements introduced by the Defendant, Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE) Limited.
MUSTAFA AL HENDI v DUBAI AEROSPACE ENTERPRISE [2013] DIFC CFI 026 — procedural directions for trial readiness (15 July 2013)
The litigation involves a dispute between Mustafa Al Hendi and Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE) Ltd, which has progressed to a stage requiring formal judicial intervention to manage the exchange of pleadings and the preparation of evidence.
MUSTAFA AL-HENDI v DUBAI AEROSPACE ENTERPRISE [2012] DIFC CFI 026 — Employment disclosure and document recovery dispute (17 April 2013)
A judicial intervention addressing the unauthorized removal of confidential corporate documents by a former employee and the scope of disclosure obligations in an employment claim for US$1 million in bonuses and allowances.
MUSTAFA AL HENDI v DUBAI AEROSPACE ENTERPRISE [2013] DIFC CFI 026 — Production order for misappropriated corporate documents (20 March 2013)
The dispute centers on the unauthorized removal of corporate materials by the Claimant, Mustafa Al Hendi, from the premises or digital systems of the Defendant, Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE) Ltd.
MUSTAFA AL HENDI v DUBAI AEROSPACE ENTERPRISE [2013] DIFC CFI 026 — Case management and strike-out conditions (17 March 2013)
The dispute centers on the Claimant’s dissatisfaction with the Defendant’s compliance regarding a Request for Further Information. Following an order by Mr. Justice David Williams on 13 November 2012, the Claimant, Mustafa Al Hendi, filed an application on 12 December 2012 (No.
MUSTAFA AL-HENDI v DUBAI AEROSPACE ENTERPRISE [2012] DIFC CFI 026 — Employment bonus dispute and RDC compliance (12 March 2013)
The Court of First Instance addresses the threshold for granting 'unless orders' in employment litigation, balancing the Claimant’s right to information against the proportionality of striking out pleadings.
MUSTAFA AL HENDI v DUBAI AEROSPACE ENTERPRISE [2012] DIFC CFI 026 — Case Management Order (13 November 2012)
A foundational procedural order establishing the litigation timeline, disclosure obligations, and alternative dispute resolution milestones in the dispute between Mustafa Al Hendi and Dubai Aerospace Enterprise.
ANNA DADIC v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2011] DIFC CFI 026/2010 — Abuse of process and repetitive litigation (06 March 2012)
The litigation involved a series of claims (CFI 008/2011, 009/2011, 010/2011, 014/2011, and 016/2011) brought by Anna Dadic against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority, the Dubai International Financial Centre, and the State of the UAE.
ANNA DADIC v THE STATE OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES [2011] DIFC CFI 026 — Judicial review application denied under Civil Restraint Order (19 August 2011)
The claimant, Anna Dadic, filed an application on 25 July 2011 seeking permission to proceed with a claim for judicial review against the State of the UAE, the Emirate of Dubai, the DIFC, and the DIFC Authority.
ANNA DADIC v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2011] DIFC CFI 026 — Extended Civil Restraint Order (21 July 2011)
The litigation history between Anna Dadic and the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority (DIFCA) reached a critical juncture following the judgment delivered on 20 July 2011.
ANNA DADIC v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2011] DIFC CFI 026 — Procedural directions for judicial review permission hearing (22 March 2011)
Justice David Williams issues critical procedural directions for a judicial review permission hearing, mandating video conference participation and addressing the threshold question of the DIFC Authority’s amenability to public law oversight.
RAFED ABDEL MOHSEN BADER AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2020] DIFC CFI 026 — Final settlement and discontinuance of long-standing banking litigation (22 April 2020)
The litigation, initiated in 2009, involved three claimants—Rafed Abdel Mohsen Bader Al Khorafi, Amrah Ali Abdel Latif Al Hamad, and Alia Mohamed Sulaiman Al Rifai—who sought damages against Bank Sarasin-Alpen (ME) Limited and its Swiss parent, Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd.
RAFED ABDEL MOHSEN BADER AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2019] DIFC CFI 026 — Interim payment consent order for costs and interest (23 December 2019)
A final procedural milestone in the long-standing banking litigation between the Al Khorafi claimants and Bank J. Safra Sarasin, formalizing the distribution of over USD 1 million in costs and interest.
RAFED ABDEL MOHSEN BADER AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2019] DIFC CFI 026 — Procedural extension for points of dispute (12 September 2019)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes a procedural timeline adjustment regarding the service of points of dispute by the Second Defendant in long-standing banking litigation.
RAFED ABDEL MOHSEN BADER AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2019] DIFC CFI 026 — Final settlement of interest on Head B-D Losses (15 May 2019)
The litigation, initiated under case number CFI-026-2009, involved a complex dispute regarding investment losses suffered by the Claimants, Rafed Abdel Mohsen Bader Al Khorafi, Amrah Ali Abdel Latif Al Hamad, and Alia Mohamed Sulaiman Al Rifai.
RAFED ABDEL MOHSEN BADER AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2018] DIFC CFI 026 — Interim payment order for interest and costs (28 October 2018)
The litigation, initiated under CFI 026/2009, involves a complex banking dispute between three claimants—Rafed Abdel Mohsen Bader Al Khorafi, Amrah Ali Abdel Latif Al Hamad, and Alia Mohamed Sulaiman Al Rifai—and two defendants, Bank Sarasin-Alpen (ME) Limited and Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd.
AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2017] DIFC CFI 026 — Procedural extension for appeal filing (31 January 2017)
This order addresses the procedural timeline for the Second Defendant to file an appeal following the determination of interest and costs by Justice Sir John Chadwick.
RAFED ABDEL MOHSEN BADER AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2017] DIFC CFI 026 — Quantum determination and costs assessment (16 January 2017)
The dispute centered on identifying the appropriate benchmark for interest on the Claimants' losses, as previously ordered by the Court in November 2015. The Claimants sought a rate derived from unauthorized overdrafts, while the Defendants proposed a significantly lower rate of 1.291% per annum,…
AL KHORAFI v BANK SARASIN-ALPEN [2016] DIFC CFI 026 — Stay of execution pending appeal (21 January 2016)
The lawsuit concerns a 2009 claim brought by Mr Rafed Abdel Mohsen Bader Al Khorafi, Mrs Amrah Ali Abdel Latif Al Hamad, and Mrs Alia Mohamed Sulaiman Al Rifai against Bank Sarasin-Alpen (ME) Limited and Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd.