LITT
Try LITT free
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2024] DIFC CFI 107 — Refusal of retrospective extension of time to appeal (07 February 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance confirms that a persistent failure to engage with judicial processes and a lack of substantive grounds for appeal will result in the summary rejection of applications for retrospective extensions of time.
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2023] DIFC CFI 107 — Refusal of retrospective extension of time to appeal (07 December 2023)
The DIFC Court of First Instance reaffirms the necessity of substantive evidence and clear grounds when seeking procedural indulgences, rejecting a late appeal application plagued by a history of non-compliance.
Alexander Reuter v Wellness United [2021] DIFC CFI 107 — Enforcement of loan agreements and personal guarantees (27 October 2023)
The litigation concerned the recovery of significant funds advanced by the Claimants—Alexander Reuter, Carlo Pianese, and Andre Bledjian—to the First Defendant, Wellness United Inc., under two distinct financial instruments: a Convertible Loan Agreement and a Bridge Loan Agreement.
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2023] DIFC CFI 107 — Pre-Trial Review procedural vacation (01 September 2023)
The litigation, registered under case number CFI 107/2021, involves a complex multi-party dispute brought by three individual Claimants—Alexander Reuter, Carlo Pianese, and Andre Bledjian—against the corporate entity Wellness United INC. and two individual Defendants.
REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2023] DIFC CFI 107 — Dismissal of security for costs application (04 July 2023)
The underlying litigation, registered under CFI 107/2021, involves a multi-party dispute where the Claimants—Alexander Reuter, Carlo Pianese, and Andre Bledjian—have initiated proceedings against Wellness United Inc., Jacob Logothetis, and Angela Turovskaya.
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2023] DIFC CFI 107 — Procedural timetable for amendment of pleadings (23 February 2023)
The litigation involves a multi-party dispute brought by Claimants Alexander Reuter, Carlo Pianese, and Andre Bledjian against Wellness United INC. and individual defendants Jacob Logothetis and Angela Turovskaya.
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2022] DIFC CFI 107 — Setting aside a default judgment under RDC Part 14 (12 December 2022)
The litigation involves three Claimants—Alexander Reuter, Carlo Pianese, and Andre Bledjian—who initiated proceedings against Wellness United Inc., Jacob Logothetis, and Angela Turovskaya.
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2022] DIFC CFI 107 — Extension of time to set aside default judgment (09 November 2022)
The litigation involves a claim brought by three claimants—Alexander Reuter, Carlo Pianese, and Andre Bledjian—against three defendants: Wellness United INC., Jacob Logothetis, and Angela Turovskaya.
ALEXANDER REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2022] DIFC CFI 107 — Default judgment for unpaid principal and interest (04 July 2022)
The lawsuit concerns a claim for specified sums of money brought by three individual claimants—Alexander Reuter, Carlo Pianese, and Andre Bledjian—against Wellness United Inc., Jacob Logothetis, and Angela Turovskaya.
REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2022] DIFC CFI 107 — Registrar mandates transition from Part 8 to Part 7 procedure (15 March 2022)
The litigation involves a multi-party dispute initiated by Mr. Alexander Reuter, Mr. Carlo Pianese, and Mr. Andre Bledjian against Wellness United INC. and two individual defendants, Mr. Jacob Logothetis and Ms. Angela Turovskaya.
REUTER v WELLNESS UNITED [2022] DIFC CFI 107 — Procedural transition from Part 8 to Part 7 (04 March 2022)
The Registrar’s order in CFI 107/2021 clarifies the strict procedural boundaries between Part 8 and Part 7 claims, mandating a full transition to Part 7 for complex disputes involving multiple parties and potential consolidation issues.