LITT
Try LITT free
COMMERCIAL BANK OF DUBAI v TOTORA RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE [2017] DIFC CFI 047 — Default judgment and jurisdictional nexus for guarantee agreements (23 January 2019)
The dispute arose from a commercial banking relationship between the Commercial Bank of Dubai (the Claimant) and Totora Restaurant and Lounge LLC (the First Defendant), a business established within the DIFC.
COMMERCIAL BANK OF DUBAI v TOTORA RESTAURANT & LOUNGE [2019] DIFC CFI 047 — Withdrawal of legal representation (22 October 2019)
The lawsuit involves a claim brought by Commercial Bank of Dubai P.S.C. against multiple defendants, including M/S Totora Restaurant & Lounge LLC, Mr. Ahmad Mohamed Ramadhan Al Rafei, Mr. Ali Abdullah Al Sidani, and Shaikha Raneya Hamad Mubarak Al Khalifa.
COMMERCIAL BANK OF DUBAI v TOTORA RESTAURANT & LOUNGE [2019] DIFC CFI 047 — Finality of JJC jurisdictional determinations (10 October 2019)
The litigation concerns a recovery claim initiated by the Commercial Bank of Dubai P.S.C. against four defendants, including the Fourth Defendant, Shaikha Raneya Hamad Mubarak Hamad Al Khalifa. The bank sought to recover a total of AED 4,500,000 on a joint and several basis.
COMMERCIAL BANK DUBAI v AHMAD MOHAMED RAMADHAN AL RAFEI [2019] DIFC CFI 047 — Consent order following JJC jurisdictional determination (15 September 2019)
A consent order formalizing the withdrawal of claims against the Second Defendant following a successful referral to the Joint Judicial Committee and subsequent private settlement.
COMMERCIAL BANK OF DUBAI v TOTORA RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE [2019] DIFC CFI 047 — Stay of proceedings pending JJC referral (16 July 2019)
This order addresses the procedural intersection between DIFC Court litigation and the jurisdiction of the Joint Judicial Committee (JJC) regarding the Second Defendant in a banking dispute.
COMMERCIAL BANK OF DUBAI v TOTORA RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE [2019] DIFC CFI 047 — Stay of proceedings pending JJC determination (04 April 2019)
The litigation involves a commercial banking dispute initiated by Commercial Bank of Dubai PSC against multiple parties, including M/S Totora Restaurant and Lounge LLC, Ahmad Mohamed Ramadhan Al Rafei, Ali Abdullah Al Sidani, and Shaikha Raneya Hamad Mubarak Hamad Al Khalifa.
COMMERCIAL BANK OF DUBAI v TOTORA RESTAURANT & LOUNGE [2018] DIFC CFI 047 — Assessment of costs following detailed bill review (15 November 2018)
The litigation involved a claim brought by Commercial Bank of Dubai P.S.C. against multiple parties, including M/S Totora Restaurant & Lounge LLC, Mr. Ali Sidani, and Shaikha Raneya Hamad Mubarak Hamad Al Khalifa.
COMMERCIAL BANK OF DUBAI v M/S TOTORA RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE [2018] DIFC CFI 047 — Assessing costs for concluded interim applications (21 June 2018)
This order clarifies the procedural timing for the detailed assessment of costs in the DIFC Courts, confirming that interim applications concluded by a court order are ripe for assessment regardless of the status of the main proceedings.
COMMERCIAL BANK OF DUBAI v TOTORA RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE [2018] DIFC CFI 047 — Witness statement impropriety and counsel conduct (11 March 2018)
The dispute arose from a jurisdictional challenge filed by the Third Defendant, Shaikha Raneya Hamad Mubarak Hamad Al Khalifa, against the Commercial Bank of Dubai PSC. In response to the Third Defendant’s jurisdictional application dated 7 December 2017, the Claimant filed a witness statement…