LITT
Try LITT free
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2019] DIFC CFI 029 — Dismissal of third-party disclosure application and assessment of costs (11 December 2019)
The Industrial Group, acting as the Claimant and Defendant by Counterclaim, initiated a formal application on 24 September 2019 seeking an order for third-party disclosure. The application was directed at a series of financial institutions, including The Saudi British Bank, HSBC Bank, Abu Dhabi…
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2019] DIFC CFI 029 — Judicial Officer order for removal of legal representation (04 November 2019)
The dispute in CFI 029/2018 involves The Industrial Group as the Claimant and Defendant by Counterclaim, and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid as the Defendant and Claimant by Counterclaim.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2019] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural adjournment of third-party disclosure application (22 October 2019)
This order details the procedural management of a pending third-party disclosure application, vacating existing timetabling directions to allow for the review of witness evidence before further judicial intervention.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2019] DIFC CFI 029 — Procedural extension for document production (24 September 2019)
A brief procedural order granting a time extension for document disclosure applications under the DIFC Rules of Court.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2019] DIFC CFI 029 — Case Management Order (05 September 2019)
This order establishes the procedural roadmap for the resolution of complex commercial disputes between The Industrial Group and Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, mandating rigorous disclosure and expert forensic scrutiny ahead of a February 2020 trial.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2019] DIFC CFI 029 — Compelling disclosure via Redfern Schedule (16 July 2019)
This order clarifies the procedural mechanism for enforcing document production and witness statement requirements under the DIFC Rules of Court following a contested Redfern Schedule review.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2019] DIFC CFI 029 — Judicial Officer rejects procedural extension for pleadings (16 April 2019)
A strict application of case management timelines in the DIFC Court of First Instance, resulting in the refusal of a late-stage request to amend pleadings.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2019] DIFC CFI 029 — Refusal of permission to appeal default judgment (16 January 2019)
This order clarifies the threshold for challenging default judgments in the DIFC Courts, specifically addressing the interplay between procedural irregularities in default requests and the substantive requirements for a valid set-off counterclaim.
THE INDUSTRIAL GROUP v ABDELAZIM EL SHIKH EL FADIL HAMID [2018] DIFC CFI 029 — Default judgment set-aside and stay of execution (25 October 2018)
The dispute arose from a default judgment entered against the Defendant, Mr. Abdelazim El Shikh El Fadil Hamid, in the amount of AED 1,376,000. The Claimant, The Industrial Group Ltd, sought recovery of these funds, alleging that the payments made to the Defendant lacked proper justification or…