LITT
Try LITT free
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v THE SECURITIES HOUSE COMPANY [2024] DIFC CFI 105 — Consent order staying costs litigation (13 August 2024)
The litigation, registered under CFI 105/2021, follows a substantive judgment delivered by Justice Lord Angus Glennie in September 2023. While the primary merits of the case have been determined, the parties remain embroiled in a secondary phase concerning the recovery of legal expenses.
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v THE SECURITIES HOUSE COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 105 — Correcting an accidental slip in the judgment sum (28 September 2023)
This amended judgment addresses a computational error in the original award, adjusting the final judgment debt from KWD 4.1 million to KWD 5.2 million.
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v THE SECURITIES HOUSE COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 105 — Procedural amendment and case management consolidation (07 July 2023)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes corporate identity updates and streamlines the expert evidence timeline in a complex cross-border commercial dispute involving Kuwaiti entities.
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v THE SECURITIES HOUSE COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 105 — Consent order amending case management timelines (12 June 2023)
This order formalizes the procedural adjustments agreed upon by the parties to modify the existing case management framework in a complex multi-party dispute.
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v AL AMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 105 — procedural dismissal of notice of discontinuance (25 May 2023)
The litigation involves a multi-party dispute between the Claimants, Ajial National Education Company, K.S.C.C. and Talal Khalifa Talal Al Jeri, and the Defendants, Al Aman Investment Company K.S.C.P, Al Ammary Educational Company W.L.L, and First Kuwaiti For Education Holding Company W.L.L.
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v THE SECURITIES HOUSE COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 105 — Procedural refinement via consent order (12 May 2023)
The litigation involves a complex multi-party dispute centered on corporate and educational holdings, with Ajial National Education Company K.S.C.C and Talal Khalifa Talal Al Jeri acting as the Claimants against a group of Respondents, including The Securities House Company, Stellar Educational…
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v THE SECURITIES HOUSE COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 105 — Procedural amendment via consent order (03 May 2023)
This order formalizes the procedural recalibration of the ongoing dispute between Ajial National Education Company and The Securities House Company, reflecting the court's role in facilitating party-led case management adjustments.
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v THE SECURITIES HOUSE COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 105 — Consent order amending case management timelines (29 March 2023)
The litigation involves a complex multi-party dispute centered on corporate and educational sector interests. The Claimants, Ajial National Education Company K.S.C.C and Talal Khalifa Talal Al Jeri, initiated proceedings against three Defendants: The Securities House Company, Stellar Educational…
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v AL AMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY [2022] DIFC CFI 105 — procedural extension for filing a reply (04 October 2022)
A procedural consent order issued by the DIFC Court of First Instance formalizing a timeline adjustment for the exchange of pleadings between the parties.
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v AL AMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY [2022] DIFC CFI 105 — procedural extension for particulars of claim (01 August 2022)
The litigation involves a complex multi-party claim initiated by Ajial National Education Company K.S.C.C and Talal Khalifa Talal Al Jer against three corporate entities: Al Aman Investment Company K.S.C.P, Al-Ammary Educational Company W.L.L, and First Kuwaiti For Education Holding Company W.L.L.
AJIAL NATIONAL EDUCATION COMPANY v AL AMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY [2022] DIFC CFI 105 — Extension of time for service of claim form (01 June 2022)
The litigation involves a complex multi-party dispute centered on the education sector, involving two Claimants and three corporate Defendants. The Claimants, Ajial National Education Company, K.S.C.C.
JOHNSON ARABIA v ARABTEC CONSTRUCTION [2020] DIFC CFI 105 — Default judgment for unpaid invoices (24 December 2020)
The litigation arose from a commercial dispute concerning unpaid invoices, where Johnson Arabia L.L.C. sought to recover a principal debt of AED 2,017,450.25 (equivalent to USD 549,339.755). The claimant, a provider of heavy lifting and equipment services, alleged that Arabtec Construction L.L.C.
TARIG MOHAMED ABDELSALAM ABDELRAHMAN v EXPRESSO TELECOM GROUP [2021] DIFC CFI 104 — Administrative closure of erroneously filed claim (16 November 2022)
The litigation initiated by Tarig Mohamed Abdelsalam Abdelrahman against Expresso Telecom Group Ltd, registered under case number CFI 104/2021, was ostensibly brought before the DIFC Court of First Instance on 5 December 2021.
RAK CERAMICS v ARABTEC CONSTRUCTION [2020] DIFC CFI 104 — Default judgment for unpaid debt (29 December 2020)
The dispute centered on a claim for a liquidated sum brought by RAK Ceramics P.J.S.C against Arabtec Construction (LLC). The claimant sought recovery of an outstanding debt, which culminated in the court ordering the defendant to satisfy the full amount claimed.
FTI CONSULTING GULF v MUTHMAINUR RAHMAN [2020] DIFC CFI 102 — Settlement and dismissal by consent (01 March 2021)
The litigation initiated under CFI 102/2020 involved FTI Consulting Gulf Limited as the Claimant and Muthmainur Rahman as the Defendant. While the specific underlying causes of action—whether related to breach of restrictive covenants, employment disputes, or professional services agreements—were…
FTI CONSULTING GULF v MUTHMAINUR RAHMAN [2020] DIFC CFI 102 — Procedural extension via consent order (31 December 2020)
The litigation under case number CFI 102/2020 involves FTI Consulting Gulf Limited as the Claimant and Muthmainur Rahman as the Defendant. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim remain outside the scope of this specific procedural order, the matter reached a juncture where the…
FTI CONSULTING GULF v PAUL WALKER [2021] DIFC CFI 101 — Consent dismissal of employment-related dispute (01 March 2021)
The litigation initiated under Claim No. CFI 101/2020 involved FTI Consulting Gulf Limited as the Claimant and Paul Walker as the Defendant. While the specific underlying causes of action—whether related to breach of restrictive covenants, employment contract disputes, or fiduciary duties—were not…
FTI CONSULTING GULF v PAUL WALKER [2021] DIFC CFI 101/2020 — Consolidation and expedited trial scheduling (28 February 2021)
The litigation arises from the departure of two former employees, Paul Walker and Muthmainur Rahman, from FTI Consulting Gulf. The Claimant, FTI Consulting Gulf, initiated separate proceedings—CFI 101/2020 against Paul Walker and CFI 102/2020 against Muthmainur Rahman—to enforce contractual…
FTI CONSULTING GULF v PAUL WALKER [2020] DIFC CFI 101 — procedural constraints on default judgment (28 December 2020)
The dispute centers on a procedural application filed by the Claimant, FTI Consulting Gulf Limited, seeking a default judgment against the Defendant, Paul Walker. On 27 December 2020, the Claimant moved the Court to exercise its powers under Part 13 of the Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC) to enter…
GHAM 2 v AJAY BHATIA [2023] DIFC CFI 100 — Final costs assessment and recovery (15 September 2023)
The litigation in CFI 100/2021 involved a dispute between the Claimant, Gham 2 Limited, and three Defendants: Mr. Ajay Bhatia, Tiya Holdings Limited, and SOL Internationl Properties Limited. Following the substantive Order of H.E.
GHAM 2 v MR AJAY BHATIA [2023] DIFC CFI 100 — procedural management of default costs certificates (31 August 2023)
The dispute arose in the context of the ongoing costs assessment process following the substantive proceedings in CFI 100/2021. After the Defendants filed a Notice of Commencement of Assessment on 26 July 2023, the Claimant served its Points of Dispute on 15 August 2023.
GHAM 2 v MR AJAY BHATIA [2023] DIFC CFI 100 — Costs liability following notice of discontinuance (26 April 2023)
This order clarifies the application of RDC 34.15, confirming that a claimant who unilaterally discontinues proceedings bears the burden of the defendant's legal costs incurred up to the date of service.
GHAM 2 v AJAY BHATIA [2023] DIFC CFI 100 — Discontinuance of proceedings (07 April 2023)
The litigation identified as CFI 100/2021 involved a high-stakes commercial dispute brought by Gham 2 Limited against three named Respondents: Mr. Ajay Bhatia, Tiya Holdings Limited, and Sol International Properties Limited.
Gham 2 Limited v Ajay Bhatia [2021] DIFC CFI 100 — Asset tracing and the enforcement of judgment debts (15 November 2021)
The litigation concerns a high-stakes enforcement action initiated by Gham 2 Limited against Mr Ajay Bhatia and two corporate entities, Tiya Holdings Limited and Sol International Properties Limited.