LITT
Try LITT free
Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop [2014] SGHC 125
In Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal law — Statutory offences.
Hon Chin Kong v Yip Fook Mun & Anor
In Hon Chin Kong v Yip Fook Mun & Anor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Lim Kay Han Irene v Public Prosecutor
In Lim Kay Han Irene v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Cheong Chun Yin v Attorney-General [2014] SGHC 124
In Cheong Chun Yin v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Public Prosecutor v Firdaus bin Abdullah
In Public Prosecutor v Firdaus bin Abdullah, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Manharlal Trikamdas Mody and another v Sumikin Bussan International (HK) Limited [2014] SGHC 123
The decision in [2014] SGHC 123 represents a significant examination of the jurisdictional boundaries of the Singapore High Court when confronted with an application to restrain foreign enforcement proceedings initiated by a foreign creditor with no presence in Singapore. The dis
HG METAL MANUFACTURING LIMITED v GAYATHRI STEELS PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors
In HG METAL MANUFACTURING LIMITED v GAYATHRI STEELS PTE. LTD. & 2 Ors, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
The "STX Mumbai" [2014] SGHC 122
Analysis of [2014] SGHC 122, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2014-06-27.
Animal Concerns Research & Education Society v ANA Contractor Pte Ltd and another
In Animal Concerns Research & Education Society v ANA Contractor Pte Ltd and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Re: ATTILAN GROUP LIMITED
Analysis of [2017] SGHC 283, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2017-11-08.
Nandakishor s/o Raj Pat Ahir v Public Prosecutor [2014] SGHC 121
The variance of urine test results should be calculated by dividing the deviation of each result from the mean by the mean, expressed as a percentage. A variance within 20% is acceptable under international forensic standards.
Singapore Piling & Civil Engineering Pte Ltd v Kim Teck Corp Pte Ltd and others
In Singapore Piling & Civil Engineering Pte Ltd v Kim Teck Corp Pte Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
EBONY RITZ SDN BHD v SUMATEC RESOURCES BERHAD
In EBONY RITZ SDN BHD v SUMATEC RESOURCES BERHAD, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Zheng Jianxing v Attorney-General [2014] SGHC 120
In Zheng Jianxing v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial Review.
Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd v Yeow Chern Lean
In Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd v Yeow Chern Lean, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Re: HARISH SALVE
Analysis of [2017] SGHC 28, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2017-02-17.
Public Prosecutor v Saiful Rizam bin Assim and other appeals [2014] SGHC 12
The High Court dismissed the Prosecution's appeal against the Respondents' sentences. It ruled that while reformative training was initially appropriate, substituting it for imprisonment after a significant portion of the term had been served would constitute disproportionate double punishment.
Public Prosecutor v Abdul Salam bin Musthafa
In Public Prosecutor v Abdul Salam bin Musthafa, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Chiam Heng Hsien (on his own behalf and as partner of Mitre Hotel Proprietors) v Chiam Heng Chow (executor of the estate of Chiam Toh Say, deceased) and others [2014] SGHC 119
In Chiam Heng Hsien (on his own behalf and as partner of Mitre Hotel Proprietors) v Chiam Heng Chow (executor of the estate of Chiam Toh Say, deceased) and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Partnership — Partners Inter Se.
Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Daimler South East Asia Pte Ltd
In Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Daimler South East Asia Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd and others v Dafni Igal and others
The Singapore High Court dismissed all eight claims against the defendants in Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd v Dafni Igal, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to prove breach of fiduciary duty or provide sufficient evidence to justify piercing the corporate veil.
Public Prosecutor v Low Chuan Woo [2014] SGHC 118
In Public Prosecutor v Low Chuan Woo, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences.
MAIN-LINE CORPORATE HOLDINGS LIMITED v UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LIMITED & Anor
In MAIN-LINE CORPORATE HOLDINGS LIMITED v UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LIMITED & Anor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Arun Kaliamurthy and others v Public Prosecutor and another matter [2014] SGHC 117
In Arun Kaliamurthy v PP [2014] SGHC 117, the High Court ordered personal costs against solicitor M. Ravi for filing an unmeritorious motion. The ruling clarifies that solicitors must maintain professional competence even in pro bono work, or risk personal liability for abuse of process.