LITT
Try LITT free
Giuffrida Luigi v Julius Baer (Singapore) Ltd (in members' voluntary liquidation) and another
The High Court dismissed Giuffrida Luigi’s claim against Bank Julius Baer, ruling that the plaintiff was estopped from denying the validity of his account transfer. The court found that his conduct and receipt of documentation proved he had knowledge of the transfer to a foreign branch.
Lo Man Heng and another v UBS AG (Yap Loo Mien, third party) [2014] SGHC 134
In Lo Man Heng and another v UBS AG (Yap Loo Mien, third party), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Banking — Branch bank, Equity — Estoppel.
THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE v ONG CHEONG WEI
In THE LAW SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE v ONG CHEONG WEI, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
The "Engedi"
Analysis of [2010] SGHC 95, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2010-03-25.
Li Huabo v Public Prosecutor [2014] SGHC 133
In Li Huabo v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v MUHAMMAD NOR HAIQAL BIN SHAMAN & Anor
In PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v MUHAMMAD NOR HAIQAL BIN SHAMAN & Anor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Bellezza Club Japan Co Ltd v Matsumura Akihiko and others
In Bellezza Club Japan Co Ltd v Matsumura Akihiko and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd and others [2014] SGHC 132
In Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Summary Judgment.
ROSLAN BIN BAKAR v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
A low IQ level alone is not evidence of an abnormality of mind for the purposes of s 33B(3) of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
Tan Beng Chua v Public Prosecutor [2014] SGHC 130
In Tan Beng Chua v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing.
The "Eagle Prestige"
Analysis of [2010] SGHC 93, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2010-03-23.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v RAMESH PERUMAL & Anor
In PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v RAMESH PERUMAL & Anor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing and another [2014] SGHC 13
In Public Prosecutor v Micheal Anak Garing and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences, Criminal Law — Complicity.
Sundercan Ltd and another v Salzman Anthony David
In Sundercan Ltd and another v Salzman Anthony David, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v RASHEED MUHAMMAD & Anor
In PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v RASHEED MUHAMMAD & Anor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
AEL and others v Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC and another [2014] SGHC 129
In AEL and others v Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Tort — Negligence.
Lim Slott v Wong Chiew Huong
In Lim Slott v Wong Chiew Huong, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
BNX v BOE
In BNX v BOE, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Oei Hong Leong v Goldman Sachs International [2014] SGHC 128
In Oei Hong Leong v Goldman Sachs International, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Arbitration — Stay of court proceedings.
Chong Peter (trading as Myths KTV & Disco Pub) v Triple 8 Enterprise Pte Ltd (trading as Mirage Deluxe KTV & Nightclub)
In Chong Peter (trading as Myths KTV & Disco Pub) v Triple 8 Enterprise Pte Ltd (trading as Mirage Deluxe KTV & Nightclub), the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
BLP v Comptroller of Income Tax [2014] SGHC 127
The High Court allowed the appeal in BLP v Comptroller of Income Tax, ruling that a special levy for major retrofitting was capital in nature. The court held that statutory maintenance duties under the BMSMA do not automatically transform a management corporation's activities into a taxable business
Public Prosecutor v AGG
In Public Prosecutor v AGG, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of .
Choo Kok Hwee v Public Prosecutor [2014] SGHC 126
(b) Held that a jail term was mandatory for a second offender under s 67(1); and (c) Failed to accord sufficient weight to all the mitigating factors such as the appellant’s willingness to plead guilty and cooperate with the authorities. I found that none of these had merit, and dismissed the appeal
D'Oz International Pte Ltd v PSB Corp Pte Ltd and another appeal
The court ruled in favor of D'Oz International Pte Ltd, ordering a $120,000 franchise fee refund. The decision clarifies the application of the presumption of similarity between foreign law and Singapore's lex fori, emphasizing that the court retains discretion to decline it if it causes injustice.