Litt
Try Litt Free
City Developments Ltd v Chief Assessor [2008] SGCA 29
Pang Chen Suan v Commissioner for Labour [2008] SGCA 22
Registrar of Vehicles v Komoco Motors Pte Ltd [2008] SGCA 19
Kay Swee Pin v Singapore Island Country Club [2008] SGCA 11
Wong Keng Leong Rayney v Law Society of Singapore [2007] SGCA 42
Teng Fuh Holdings Pte Ltd v Collector of Land Revenue [2007] SGCA 14
Aspinden Holdings Ltd v Chief Assessor and Comptroller of Property Tax [2006] SGCA 31
Shorvon Simon v Singapore Medical Council [2005] SGCA 49
Attorney-General v Ng Hock Guan [2004] SGCA 21
Public Service Commission v Lai Swee Lin Linda [2001] SGCA 5
Tan Tiang Hin Jerry v Singapore Medical Council [2000] SGCA 17
Arokiasamy Joseph v Singapore Airlines Staff Union [2000] SGCA 15
How LITT AI Helps Lawyers, Advocates—and Everyone Else
Registration Is Not Ownership: The Supreme Court’s Gopi Verdict and the Future of Property Law in India
The Supreme Court in K Gopi v. Sub-Registrar struck down Tamil Nadu’s Rule 55-A(i) for overstepping the Registration Act, reaffirming that Sub-Registrars can’t assess title—only courts can. It’s a landmark on delegated power and property rights.
How does the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation balance power with fairness?
The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation ensures fairness in governance by protecting individuals' reasonable expectations arising from administrative promises or practices. Balancing trust and accountability, it prevents arbitrary actions while respecting public interest.