LITT
Try LITT free
Lim Tean v Attorney General [2020] SGHC 270
In Lim Tean v Attorney General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review.
Ravi s/o Madasamy v Attorney-General [2020] SGHC 221
In Ravi s/o Madasamy v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Judicial review, Administrative Law — Judicial review.
Shanmugam Manohar v Attorney-General and another [2020] SGHC 120
In Shanmugam Manohar v Attorney-General and another, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Disciplinary proceedings, Administrative Law — Judicial review.
Tok Ee Cheng v Jardin Smith International Pte Ltd [2020] SGHC 111
In Tok Ee Cheng v Jardin Smith International Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Agency — construction of agent’s authority, Administrative Law — Remedies.
Gobi a/l Avedian and another v Attorney-General and another appeal [2020] SGCA 77
In Gobi a/l Avedian and another v Attorney-General and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review, Administrative Law — Remedies.
Daniel De Costa Augustin v Attorney-General [2020] SGCA 60
In Daniel De Costa Augustin v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review, Constitutional Law — Judicial review.
Lee Pheng Lip Ian v Chen Fun Gee and others [2020] SGCA 6
In Lee Pheng Lip Ian v Chen Fun Gee and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative law — Judicial review.
Muhammad Nabill bin Mohd Fuad v Public Prosecutor [2020] SGCA 25
The Court of Appeal allowed Muhammad Nabill bin Mohd Fuad’s appeal, substituting a capital trafficking charge with possession of diamorphine and acquitting him of cannabis trafficking. The ruling highlights the Prosecution's burden of proof and limits on judicial intervention during trials.
Asia Development Pte Ltd v Attorney-General [2020] SGCA 22
In Asia Development Pte Ltd v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review, Revenue Law — Stamp duties.
CBB v Law Society of Singapore [2019] SGHC 293
The High Court quashed the Law Society Council's decision regarding s 85(4C) of the Legal Profession Act, ruling the process legally flawed. The Court ordered a reconsideration, emphasizing that disciplinary discretion must prioritize the profession's reputation over irrelevant factors.
Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman v Attorney-General [2019] SGHC 217
In Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman v Attorney-General, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review, Civil Procedure — Discovery of documents.
Chung Wan v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGHC 186
In Chung Wan v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal, Administrative Law — Natural justice.
Re Asia Development Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC 181
Analysis of [2019] SGHC 181, a decision of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore on 2019-08-02.
Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2019] SGCA 37
In Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v Public Prosecutor and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Administrative Law — Judicial review.
Wong Souk Yee v Attorney-General [2019] SGCA 25
In Wong Souk Yee v Attorney-General, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review, Civil Procedure — Costs.
Ahmad Kasim bin Adam (suing as an Administrator of the estate of Adam bin Haji Anwar and in his own personal capacity) v Moona Esmail Tamby Merican s/o Mohamed Ganse and others [2019] SGCA 23
In Ahmad Kasim bin Adam (suing as an Administrator of the estate of Adam bin Haji Anwar and in his own personal capacity) v Moona Esmail Tamby Merican s/o Mohamed Ganse and others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Remedies, Land — Adverse poss
Re Nalpon, Zero Geraldo Mario [2018] SGCA 71
Analysis of [2018] SGCA 71, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2018-10-24.
AXY and others v Comptroller of Income Tax [2018] SGCA 23
In AXY and others v Comptroller of Income Tax, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Revenue Law — International taxation, Administrative Law — Judicial review.
SINGAPORE MEDICAL COUNCIL v DR LING CHIA TIEN
The court dismissed the appeal against the disciplinary tribunal's sentence, finding that a 19-month suspension was not manifestly inadequate and that the SMC's primary case for a higher sentence was based on an overstated assessment of harm and culpability.
SGB Starkstrom Pte Ltd v Commissioner for Labour [2016] SGCA 27
In SGB Starkstrom Pte Ltd v Commissioner for Labour, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review, Employment Law — Work Injury Compensation Act.
Sim Yong Teng and another v Singapore Swimming Club [2016] SGCA 10
The principle of necessity does not apply to private associations to excuse apparent bias in disciplinary proceedings, as private bodies can amend their rules to ensure impartial panels.
Per Ah Seng Robin and another v Housing and Development Board and another [2015] SGCA 62
In Per Ah Seng Robin and another v Housing and Development Board and another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Judicial review, Administrative Law — Natural justice.
Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General and another matter [2015] SGCA 59
In Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 59, the Court of Appeal ruled the appellant's detention unlawful, finding it exceeded the Minister's powers under the CLTPA. The court ordered his release, clarifying that preventive detention requires a clear nexus to threats against public order.
Muhammad Ridzuan bin Mohd Ali v Attorney-General [2015] SGCA 53
The Public Prosecutor's decision not to grant a certificate of substantive assistance under s 33B(2)(b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act is reviewable on grounds of bad faith, malice, or unconstitutionality, but the applicant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case of reaso