Statute Details
- Title: Notice under Sections 10(6) and 17(6) for the Issue of Revised Loose-leaf Pages of Subsidiary Legislation Issue 1/2001
- Act Code: RELA1983-S352-2001
- Type: Subsidiary legislation notice (sl)
- Authorising Act: Revised Edition of the Laws Act (Chapter 275)
- Key Legal Basis: Sections 10(6) and 17(6) of the Revised Edition of the Laws Act
- Enacting Instrument: Notice issued by the Law Revision Commissioners
- Schedule: Revised loose-leaf pages (incorporating amendments up to 30 June 2001) to the Rules of Court (Chapter 322, R 5)
- Commencement / Effective Date: 31 July 2001 (appointed as the date the revised loose-leaf pages come into force)
- Publication / Date of Notice: Dated 6 July 2001
- Signature: CHAN SEK KEONG, Chairman, Law Revision Commission
- Document Identifier: No. S 352
- Status: Current version as at 27 Mar 2026 (per the platform’s timeline/versioning)
What Is This Legislation About?
This instrument is a formal notice issued under the Revised Edition of the Laws Act (Cap. 275). Its purpose is not to create new substantive legal rules by itself, but to bring into force revised “loose-leaf pages” that update an existing body of subsidiary legislation—here, the Rules of Court (Cap. 322, R 5).
In practical terms, the notice tells lawyers and the public that the Law Revision Commissioners have prepared a revised set of pages that incorporate amendments made up to 30 June 2001. It then appoints a specific date—31 July 2001—as the date those revised pages come into force. This ensures that the official legal text used by practitioners reflects the latest amendments.
Because the notice is tied to the mechanics of law revision and publication, it is best understood as part of Singapore’s legal infrastructure for maintaining authoritative versions of legislation. It is a “versioning and commencement” device: it confirms when the updated consolidated text becomes legally effective.
What Are the Key Provisions?
1. Legal authority to issue revised loose-leaf pages (Sections 10(6) and 17(6) of Cap. 275)
The notice is grounded in the Revised Edition of the Laws Act, specifically sections 10(6) and 17(6). These provisions empower the Law Revision Commissioners to prepare and publish revised loose-leaf pages that consolidate amendments into the official text of subsidiary legislation.
For practitioners, the significance is that the notice provides the statutory basis for treating the revised loose-leaf pages as the authoritative version of the Rules of Court once the appointed commencement date arrives. In other words, the notice is the bridge between (i) amendments that have been made and (ii) the consolidated, updated publication that practitioners rely on.
2. Incorporation of amendments up to a cut-off date (30 June 2001)
The notice states that, pursuant to sections 10(6) and 17(6), the Law Revision Commissioners have prepared and published loose-leaf pages incorporating all amendments up to 30 June 2001 made to the Rules of Court (Cap. 322, R 5).
This cut-off date is important for legal research and litigation practice. It signals that the revised pages are intended to reflect the Rules of Court as amended through that date. If an amendment occurred after 30 June 2001, it would not be captured in this particular revised loose-leaf issue (unless later revisions were issued). Therefore, when advising clients or drafting pleadings, counsel should confirm whether any amendments after the cut-off date exist and whether they have been incorporated into a later issue.
3. Appointment of the commencement date for the revised pages (31 July 2001)
The operative part of the notice provides that the Commissioners have appointed 31 July 2001 as the date the revised loose-leaf pages of the Rules of Court in this issue shall come into force.
This is the core legal effect of the notice. Even though the underlying amendments were already made by earlier instruments, the notice determines when the revised consolidated form becomes the legally effective reference text for the Rules of Court. Practically, it reduces uncertainty about which version of the Rules of Court should be relied upon in court filings and submissions after that date.
4. Formalities and identification
The notice includes standard formal elements: the “Whereas” recital explaining the preparation and publication of the loose-leaf pages, the “Now, therefore” operative clause, the date of signature (6 July 2001), and the signature of the Chairman of the Law Revision Commission. It also includes a document reference in square brackets: [AG/RSL/1/2001].
While these may appear administrative, they matter for citation and verification. In legal practice, being able to cite the correct notice and its issue number helps ensure that research results align with the authoritative text used at the relevant time.
How Is This Legislation Structured?
This instrument is structured as a short notice with a schedule and a single main operative statement. The platform text indicates:
• Title / heading identifying the notice and the “Issue 1/2001” of revised loose-leaf pages.
• Enacting formula referencing the Revised Edition of the Laws Act and the relevant empowering provisions (sections 10(6) and 17(6)).
• The Schedule (as indicated by the interface) which, in substance, corresponds to the revised loose-leaf pages for the Rules of Court (Cap. 322, R 5) incorporating amendments up to 30 June 2001.
• Operative clause appointing 31 July 2001 as the commencement date for the revised pages.
• Date and signature by the Chairman of the Law Revision Commission.
There are no “Parts” or detailed substantive sections within the notice itself. Its structure reflects its function: to notify the public and the legal profession of the effective date of an updated official publication.
Who Does This Legislation Apply To?
The notice applies broadly to anyone who uses the Rules of Court as subsidiary legislation—most directly, lawyers, litigants, court officers, and legal researchers. It does not target a particular class of persons; rather, it updates the authoritative text of the Rules of Court.
In terms of legal effect, the notice affects the version of the Rules of Court that is treated as current and in force from the appointed date. Therefore, it has practical implications for litigation strategy, drafting, and compliance with procedural requirements, because the Rules of Court govern how civil and related proceedings are conducted.
Why Is This Legislation Important?
Although this notice is brief, it is important because it supports legal certainty in procedural law. The Rules of Court are central to litigation practice. When amendments are made, practitioners need to know when the consolidated, updated version becomes the official reference text. By appointing a specific commencement date for the revised loose-leaf pages, the notice helps avoid disputes about which procedural rules apply.
Second, the notice is a reminder that legal research in Singapore is not only about identifying the “amending” instruments, but also about tracking consolidated revisions. Many practitioners rely on the revised edition text for efficiency. This notice confirms that the revised loose-leaf pages for Issue 1/2001 were prepared to incorporate amendments up to 30 June 2001 and become effective on 31 July 2001.
Third, for practitioners preparing submissions, affidavits, and pleadings, the effective date matters. Procedural rules can affect deadlines, filing requirements, and court processes. Even if the substantive amendments were already enacted earlier, the revised loose-leaf publication provides the authoritative consolidated wording that counsel will cite and apply. Using an outdated version can lead to errors in compliance or citation.
Related Legislation
- Revised Edition of the Laws Act (Chapter 275) — in particular sections 10(6) and 17(6)
- Rules of Court (Chapter 322, R 5) — the subsidiary legislation updated by this revised loose-leaf issue
Source Documents
This article provides an overview of the Notice under Sections 10(6) and 17(6) for the Issue of Revised Loose-leaf Pages of Subsidiary Legislation Issue 1/2001 for legal research and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult the official text for authoritative provisions.