Submit Article
Legal Analysis. Regulatory Intelligence. Jurisprudence.
Search articles, case studies, legal topics...
Singapore

Land Titles Act 1993 — Part 2: Right of Footway

300 wpm
0%
Chunk
Theme
Font

Part of a comprehensive analysis of the Land Titles Act 1993

All Parts in This Series

  1. PART 19
  2. PART 2
  3. PART 3
  4. PART 4
  5. PART 5
  6. PART 6
  7. PART 7
  8. PART 8
  9. PART 9
  10. PART 10
  11. PART 11
  12. PART 12
  13. PART 13
  14. PART 14
  15. PART 15
  16. Part 2
  17. PART 16
  18. PART 17
  19. PART 18
  20. PART 19
  21. Part 1
  22. Part 2 (this article)
  23. PART 1
  24. PART 2

Key Provisions and Their Purpose in Part 2 of the Land Titles Act 1993

Part 2 of the Land Titles Act 1993 establishes fundamental rights concerning access to land, specifically addressing the rights of persons entitled to an estate or interest in possession in the land identified as the dominant tenement. The key provision grants a "full and free right" for such persons, and those authorised by them, to access the dominant tenement on foot at all times and for all purposes, excluding the use of animals or vehicles.

"Full and free right for every person who is at any time entitled to an estate or interest in possession in the land herein indicated as the dominant tenement, and every person authorised by any such person, to go, pass, and repass, on foot, at all times and for all purposes, without animals or vehicles, to and from that dominant tenement." — Part 2, Land Titles Act 1993

Verify source in source document →

This provision exists to ensure that the owners or lawful occupiers of the dominant tenement have uninterrupted and lawful access to their land. The right to "go, pass, and repass" is essential in maintaining the usability and enjoyment of the land, particularly where the dominant tenement may be landlocked or otherwise inaccessible without crossing another parcel of land (the servient tenement). By codifying this right, the Act protects landowners from obstruction or denial of access, which could otherwise diminish the value or utility of their property.

Furthermore, the restriction to access "on foot" and "without animals or vehicles" reflects a balance between the rights of the dominant tenement owner and the interests of the servient tenement owner. It limits the extent of intrusion to a reasonable degree, preventing potential damage or excessive use of the servient land.

Absence of Definitions in Part 2

Notably, Part 2 of the Land Titles Act 1993 does not contain any specific definitions related to the rights of access or the terms used within this provision. This absence suggests that the Act relies on the ordinary and legal meanings of terms such as "dominant tenement," "estate or interest in possession," and "authorised person," which are well-established in property law.

The lack of definitions may also indicate that the legislature intended for these terms to be interpreted consistently with existing legal principles and case law, thereby providing clarity and predictability in the application of these rights.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

The text of Part 2 does not specify any penalties for non-compliance with the right of access provision. This omission implies that enforcement and remedies for breaches of this right may be governed by other provisions within the Land Titles Act 1993 or by general principles of property and civil law.

Typically, where a person unlawfully obstructs access to a dominant tenement, the affected party may seek relief through injunctions, damages, or other equitable remedies. The absence of explicit penalties within Part 2 underscores the Act's focus on establishing the right itself, leaving enforcement mechanisms to be addressed elsewhere.

Cross-References to Other Acts

Part 2 does not contain any cross-references to other Acts. This suggests that the right of access granted under this provision is intended to operate independently within the framework of the Land Titles Act 1993.

However, in practice, the exercise and enforcement of these rights may intersect with other legislation, such as the Land Acquisition Act or statutes governing easements and servitudes. The absence of explicit cross-references in Part 2 highlights the self-contained nature of the access right but does not preclude interaction with other legal regimes.

Conclusion

Part 2 of the Land Titles Act 1993 plays a crucial role in safeguarding the rights of persons entitled to estates or interests in possession in dominant tenements by granting them a full and free right of pedestrian access. This provision ensures that landowners can enjoy their property without undue interference, while balancing the interests of servient tenement owners by limiting access to foot traffic without animals or vehicles.

The absence of definitions, penalties, and cross-references within this Part indicates a deliberate legislative approach to establish the right clearly and succinctly, relying on established legal principles for interpretation and enforcement.

Sections Covered in This Analysis

  • Part 2, Land Titles Act 1993

Source Documents

For the authoritative text, consult SSO.

Written by Sushant Shukla
1.5×

More in

Legal Wires

Legal Wires

Stay ahead of the legal curve. Get expert analysis and regulatory updates natively delivered to your inbox.

Success! Please check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription.