Submit Article
Legal Analysis. Regulatory Intelligence. Jurisprudence.
Search articles, case studies, legal topics...
Singapore

Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) Order 2018

Overview of the Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) Order 2018, Singapore sl.

300 wpm
0%
Chunk
Theme
Font

Statute Details

  • Title: Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) Order 2018
  • Act Code: ITA1947-S211-2018
  • Legislation Type: Subsidiary legislation (SL)
  • Authorising Act: Income Tax Act (Chapter 134)
  • Authorising Power: Section 13(12) of the Income Tax Act
  • Order Number: S 211/2018
  • Citation: Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) Order 2018
  • Deemed Commencement: Deemed to have come into operation on 26 February 2018
  • Enacting Date: Made on 17 April 2018
  • Key Provisions: Section 1 (Citation and commencement); Section 2 (Exemption)
  • Status: Current version as at 27 March 2026 (per the legislation portal)

What Is This Legislation About?

The Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) Order 2018 is a targeted tax exemption order made under Singapore’s Income Tax Act. In plain terms, it provides that a specific category of foreign-sourced income—namely, a defined share of partnership profits—received in Singapore by a Singapore-incorporated entity is exempt from tax.

Although it sits within the broader framework of Singapore’s income tax system, this Order is not a general policy statement. It is a narrow instrument that applies to a particular partnership arrangement involving Parkway Life Japan2 Pte Ltd (a company incorporated in Singapore) and G.K. Nest (an entity incorporated in Japan). The exemption is linked to profits derived from particular Japanese real estate assets and is conditioned on compliance with approval terms set out in a specified letter.

Practitioners should view this Order as an example of how Singapore uses subsidiary legislation to implement bespoke tax treatment for cross-border structures—especially those involving foreign partnerships and investments in overseas property—while maintaining administrative control through conditions attached to the exemption.

What Are the Key Provisions?

Section 1 (Citation and commencement) establishes the formal identity of the instrument and its effective date. The Order is deemed to have come into operation on 26 February 2018. This “deemed” commencement is legally significant: it means the exemption can apply to qualifying income received on or after that date, even though the Order was made later (on 17 April 2018).

Section 2 (Exemption) is the operative provision. The exemption is structured in three layers: (i) who receives the income, (ii) what kind of profits are exempt, and (iii) what conditions must be satisfied.

First, the recipient and the relevant profits. Section 2(1) provides that the “share of partnership profits” described in Section 2(2) of the partnership between Parkway Life Japan2 Pte Ltd and G.K. Nest is exempt from tax. The exemption applies to the share of partnership profits received in Singapore by Parkway Life Japan2 Pte Ltd on or after 26 February 2018.

Second, the source and character of the profits. Section 2(2) narrows the exemption to partnership profits derived from either (a) rental income or (b) capital gains from divestment of a specific property: “Konosu Nursing Home Kyoseien”, situated in Konosu City, Saitama Prefecture, Japan. This means the exemption is not available for all foreign income streams of the partnership; it is confined to profits attributable to that named property and to those two specified profit types.

Third, the conditions attached to the exemption. Section 2(3) states that the exemption under Section 2(1) is subject to the terms and conditions specified in the letter of approval dated 29 March 2018 addressed to Parkway Trust Management Ltd. This is a critical compliance point. Even where the income falls within the described category, the exemption may be lost or become vulnerable if the approval conditions are not met. For practitioners, this makes the approval letter effectively part of the legal “eligibility” framework, even though the Order itself does not reproduce the conditions.

Practical drafting note: The Order refers to a “letter of approval” and identifies the addressee. In practice, lawyers should confirm (i) the exact terms of that letter, (ii) whether it imposes ongoing obligations (e.g., reporting, asset holding requirements, restrictions on disposal, governance or compliance measures), and (iii) whether breach triggers withdrawal or adjustment of the exemption.

How Is This Legislation Structured?

This Order is extremely concise and consists of an enacting formula and two substantive provisions.

Section 1 deals with citation and commencement. It provides the legal name of the instrument and sets the effective date for the exemption.

Section 2 contains the exemption. It is subdivided into three sub-paragraphs: (1) the general exemption for the defined share of partnership profits received in Singapore; (2) the specific description of the partnership profits (rental income and capital gains from divestment of the named property); and (3) the condition that the exemption is subject to terms in the specified approval letter.

There are no additional parts, schedules, or detailed procedural provisions in the extract provided. The legal mechanism is therefore straightforward: identify the recipient, identify the partnership profit category and source, and then apply the condition precedent/ongoing condition contained in the approval letter.

Who Does This Legislation Apply To?

The exemption applies to Parkway Life Japan2 Pte Ltd, a company incorporated in Singapore, in respect of its receipt in Singapore of a defined share of partnership profits from the partnership with G.K. Nest, an entity incorporated in Japan.

While the Order is directed at the Singapore recipient, it is also implicitly tied to the partnership arrangement and the underlying investment in Japan. The exemption is limited to profits derived from a specific Japanese property—Konosu Nursing Home Kyoseien—and limited to the profit types of rental income and capital gains on divestment. Accordingly, the exemption is not available to other entities, other partnerships, or other foreign assets unless they fall within the precise description in the Order.

Finally, the exemption is conditional on compliance with the terms and conditions in the 29 March 2018 approval letter addressed to Parkway Trust Management Ltd. This creates a practical linkage between the tax exemption and the administrative approval framework governing the arrangement.

Why Is This Legislation Important?

Although the Order is narrow, it is legally and commercially significant. It demonstrates how Singapore can provide tax relief for cross-border investment structures while maintaining control through conditions attached to approvals. For practitioners advising on foreign investment vehicles, partnerships, or property-linked income streams, this Order illustrates the importance of aligning the tax treatment with the exact statutory description of the income and the asset source.

From an enforcement and compliance perspective, the conditional nature of the exemption (Section 2(3)) is the key risk area. Even if the income is derived from the named property and qualifies as rental income or capital gains on divestment, the exemption remains “subject to” the approval letter’s terms. Lawyers should therefore treat the approval letter as a core document in the tax analysis and ensure that ongoing obligations are monitored and documented.

In addition, the deemed commencement date (26 February 2018) can affect tax computations, filing positions, and potential disputes. Where qualifying profits were received after that date, the exemption may apply retroactively in the sense that the Order’s effective date precedes the making date. Practitioners should consider whether the taxpayer’s tax returns for relevant periods reflect the exemption and whether any adjustments are required.

Finally, the Order is a useful reference point for understanding how Singapore’s Income Tax Act empowers the Minister for Finance to grant exemptions via subsidiary legislation. Section 13(12) is the enabling provision, and this Order is an example of the Minister’s power being exercised to tailor tax outcomes to a specific arrangement.

  • Income Tax Act (Chapter 134) — in particular, section 13(12) (the authorising provision for this Order)
  • Income Tax Act — general provisions governing the taxation of income, exemptions, and the administration of tax reliefs (as applicable)
  • Legislation Timeline — for confirming the correct version and effective date (as referenced in the legislation portal)

Source Documents

This article provides an overview of the Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) Order 2018 for legal research and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult the official text for authoritative provisions.

Written by Sushant Shukla
1.5×

More in

Legal Wires

Legal Wires

Stay ahead of the legal curve. Get expert analysis and regulatory updates natively delivered to your inbox.

Success! Please check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription.