Submit Article
Legal Analysis. Regulatory Intelligence. Jurisprudence.
Singapore

Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 5) Order 2014

Overview of the Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 5) Order 2014, Singapore sl.

Statute Details

  • Title: Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 5) Order 2014
  • Act Code: ITA1947-S408-2014
  • Type: Subsidiary Legislation (SL)
  • Authorising Act: Income Tax Act (Chapter 134), specifically section 13(12)
  • Legislative Citation: SL 408/2014
  • Enactment Date: Made on 29 May 2014
  • Commencement: Not stated in the extract (orders of this type typically take effect on making unless otherwise provided)
  • Status: Current version as at 27 Mar 2026
  • Key Provision: Section 2 (Exemption)

What Is This Legislation About?

The Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 5) Order 2014 is a targeted tax exemption instrument issued under the Income Tax Act. In plain terms, it grants a specific company—V-Sciences Investments Pte Ltd—an exemption from Singapore tax on a particular category of foreign-sourced income that the company received in Singapore.

Unlike broad-based tax regimes that apply to many taxpayers, this Order is narrow in scope. It is designed to address a particular tax outcome for a particular taxpayer, tied to a defined transaction and a defined financial year. The exemption relates to income received in Singapore from the United States of America, arising from the disposal of stock dividends distributed by a US company.

Practitioners should view this Order as part of Singapore’s administrative and legislative toolkit for granting exemptions where the statutory framework permits. The Order does not create a general rule for all foreign income; rather, it operates as a bespoke exemption subject to conditions set out in a letter of approval.

What Are the Key Provisions?

1. Citation (Section 1)
Section 1 provides the short title: the “Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 5) Order 2014”. This is standard drafting and primarily assists in identification and referencing.

2. The exemption granted (Section 2(1))
Section 2(1) is the operative provision. It states that V-Sciences Investments Pte Ltd is granted exemption from tax on the income referred to in sub-paragraph (2) which it received in Singapore from the United States of America, in its financial year ended 31 March 2008.

Two practical points follow from this wording. First, the exemption is limited to income “received in Singapore” and “from the United States of America.” Second, it is limited to the company’s specific financial year (ended 31 March 2008). Therefore, even if the same company had other foreign income in other years, the exemption would not automatically extend to those amounts unless covered by another order or by a different statutory mechanism.

3. The specific income covered (Section 2(2))
Section 2(2) defines the income precisely: it is the sum of money derived from the disposal by V-Sciences Investments Pte Ltd of the stock dividends distributed by Replidyne Inc, a company located in the United States of America, to V-Sciences Investments Pte Ltd in the year 2006.

This definition is transaction-specific and asset-specific. The exemption is not framed as “dividends” generally, nor as “foreign income” generally. Instead, it is tied to (i) stock dividends distributed by a named US company (Replidyne Inc), (ii) received by V-Sciences Investments Pte Ltd in 2006, and (iii) subsequently “disposed” by V-Sciences Investments Pte Ltd, with the exemption applying to the proceeds (or “sum of money”) derived from that disposal.

For tax practitioners, this matters for characterisation and quantification. The exemption will likely depend on how the disposal proceeds were treated for tax purposes and whether the disposal relates directly to the stock dividends referenced. Where there are multiple lots, partial disposals, or corporate actions, careful tracing may be needed to ensure the exempt amount is correctly computed.

4. Conditions and approval letter (Section 2(3))
Section 2(3) provides that the exemption under Section 2(1) is subject to the terms and conditions specified in the letter of approval dated 14 May 2014 addressed to the tax agent of V-Sciences Investments Pte Ltd.

This is a critical compliance hook. Even though the Order itself grants the exemption, it does not operate in isolation. The letter of approval may contain conditions precedent or ongoing obligations—such as documentation requirements, reporting obligations, restrictions on use of funds, or conditions relating to the transaction structure. In practice, the letter of approval is often where the “real” administrative requirements sit. A lawyer advising the taxpayer would therefore need to obtain and review that approval letter to confirm the scope of compliance and the consequences of non-compliance.

5. Making and signature
The Order states it was made on 29 May 2014 by Lim Soo Hoon, Permanent Secretary (Finance) (Performance), Ministry of Finance, Singapore. The inclusion of the maker and the date supports the validity and provenance of the instrument.

How Is This Legislation Structured?

This Order is extremely short and consists of a minimal structure:

(a) Section 1: Citation (short title).
(b) Section 2: Exemption (with three sub-paragraphs defining the taxpayer, the exempt income, and the conditions).

There are no Parts, schedules, or detailed procedural provisions in the extract. The operative content is concentrated in Section 2, and the conditions are incorporated by reference to an external letter of approval.

Who Does This Legislation Apply To?

The Order applies to V-Sciences Investments Pte Ltd only. It is not drafted as a general exemption for categories of taxpayers (such as all companies with foreign-sourced dividends) and does not describe eligibility criteria that other taxpayers could satisfy.

Its scope is also limited by time and transaction: the exemption applies to income received in Singapore from the United States of America in the company’s financial year ended 31 March 2008, and the income is specifically the proceeds derived from the disposal of stock dividends distributed by Replidyne Inc in 2006.

Accordingly, for other taxpayers, the Order is generally not a source of entitlement. It may, however, be relevant for comparative analysis or for understanding how the Ministry of Finance uses section 13(12) of the Income Tax Act to grant bespoke exemptions subject to approval conditions.

Why Is This Legislation Important?

Although the Order is narrow, it is legally significant because it demonstrates the mechanism by which Singapore can grant exemptions from tax on foreign income. For practitioners, the key takeaway is that exemptions can be granted through subsidiary legislation where the Income Tax Act authorises the Minister to do so. This means that the legal basis for the exemption is not merely administrative; it is anchored in statutory power (section 13(12) of the Income Tax Act).

From a compliance and litigation-risk perspective, the conditional nature of the exemption is equally important. Section 2(3) makes the exemption dependent on the terms and conditions in a specific letter of approval. If those conditions are not met—whether due to incorrect reporting, failure to provide documentation, or deviation from the approved transaction—there may be grounds for the tax exemption to be withdrawn or for the tax authority to reassess the taxpayer’s position. A lawyer should therefore treat the approval letter as part of the legal framework governing the exemption.

Practically, the Order also affects how tax computations should be documented for the relevant financial year. Because the exemption is tied to a disposal event and to proceeds derived from that disposal, practitioners should ensure that accounting records, tax schedules, and supporting evidence align with the defined exempt income. This includes tracing the stock dividends from the US company, identifying the disposal in the relevant period, and ensuring the amount claimed matches the “sum of money derived” from that disposal.

Finally, this Order can be relevant in due diligence contexts. When reviewing historical tax positions of V-Sciences Investments Pte Ltd (or related entities), counsel may need to confirm whether the company relied on this exemption, whether it complied with the approval conditions, and whether any subsequent amendments or related orders affect the position.

  • Income Tax Act (Chapter 134) — in particular, section 13(12) (the authorising provision for the Minister to make exemption orders)
  • Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) Orders — other numbered orders may exist granting similar exemptions to other taxpayers or for other transactions (consult the legislation timeline)
  • Timeline / Legislation history — relevant for confirming the correct version as at the relevant date (the Order is shown as current as at 27 Mar 2026)

Source Documents

This article provides an overview of the Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 5) Order 2014 for legal research and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult the official text for authoritative provisions.

Written by Sushant Shukla

More in

Legal Wires

Legal Wires

Stay ahead of the legal curve. Get expert analysis and regulatory updates natively delivered to your inbox.

Success! Please check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription.