Submit Article
Legal Analysis. Regulatory Intelligence. Jurisprudence.
Singapore

Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 2) Order 2010

Overview of the Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 2) Order 2010, Singapore sl.

Statute Details

  • Title: Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 2) Order 2010
  • Act Code: ITA1947-S399-2010
  • Type: Subsidiary Legislation (SL)
  • Enacting / Authorising Act: Income Tax Act (Chapter 134), specifically section 13(12)
  • Citation: Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 2) Order 2010
  • Legislation Number: SL 399/2010
  • Date Made: 19 July 2010
  • Commencement Date: Not stated in the extract (order is “made” on 19 July 2010)
  • Status (as provided): Current version as at 27 Mar 2026
  • Key Provisions: Section 1 (Citation); Section 2 (Exemption)
  • Related Legislation: Income Tax Act (Chapter 134); legislation timeline / amendments (per platform)

What Is This Legislation About?

The Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 2) Order 2010 is a targeted tax exemption instrument made under the Income Tax Act of Singapore. In plain terms, it grants a specific company an exemption from Singapore tax on certain foreign-sourced dividends it receives.

Unlike broad-based tax regimes that apply to many taxpayers, this Order is narrow in scope. It is directed at Fairbanks Holdings Pte Ltd and covers dividends received in Singapore from two Malaysian companies: Sekuriti Pejal Sdn Berhad and Syarikat Kepunyaan Khas Sdn Berhad. The exemption applies to dividends received from those companies, subject to conditions set out in an approval letter.

Practitioners should view this Order as an example of how Singapore’s tax framework can be supplemented by ministerial orders to provide relief for qualifying foreign income—particularly dividends—where policy objectives (such as investment incentives or administrative alignment with approval conditions) are met.

What Are the Key Provisions?

Section 1 (Citation) is a standard provision. It confirms the short title of the instrument: the “Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 2) Order 2010”. While not substantive, it is important for legal referencing and for ensuring correct identification in filings, correspondence, and audits.

Section 2 (Exemption) is the operative clause. Under sub-paragraph (1), the Order grants Fairbanks Holdings Pte Ltd an exemption from tax on dividends received in Singapore from the two specified Malaysian companies. The Order expressly identifies the foreign companies and the relevant shareholding thresholds: Fairbanks Holdings Pte Ltd owns 10% of the total number of issued ordinary shares in Sekuriti Pejal Sdn Berhad, and 20% in Syarikat Kepunyaan Khas Sdn Berhad.

What the exemption covers is therefore not “all foreign income” or “all foreign dividends”. It is limited to dividends received in Singapore from those two named entities, and it is tied to the stated ownership percentages. For practitioners, this means the exemption’s applicability is fact-sensitive: it depends on (i) the identity of the dividend-paying companies, (ii) the fact that dividends are received in Singapore, and (iii) the ownership levels described in the Order.

Section 2(2) (Conditions and approval letter) introduces a critical limitation. The exemption is subject to the terms and conditions specified in a letter of approval dated 15 January 2010 addressed to the tax agent of Fairbanks Holdings Pte Ltd. This is a common feature of Singapore tax exemptions: the statutory instrument grants relief, but compliance is governed by conditions in an approval letter or administrative requirements.

From a legal and compliance perspective, this conditionality is often where disputes arise. If the taxpayer fails to satisfy a condition (for example, reporting requirements, documentation obligations, or other eligibility criteria), the exemption may be withdrawn or denied for relevant periods. Accordingly, counsel should treat the approval letter as an essential primary document and ensure that the taxpayer’s records and tax filings align with those terms.

Making and authority: The Order is made “in exercise of the powers conferred by section 13(12) of the Income Tax Act”. The enacting formula indicates that the Minister for Finance has delegated authority to grant such exemptions by order. The Order is signed by PETER ONG, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, on 19 July 2010. While the extract does not reproduce the full text of section 13(12), the reference signals that this exemption is part of a statutory mechanism allowing the Minister to grant relief for foreign income in specified circumstances.

How Is This Legislation Structured?

This Order is extremely concise and consists of:

(a) A citation provision (Section 1), and (b) a single exemption provision (Section 2) with two sub-paragraphs. There are no Parts, schedules, or detailed procedural sections in the extract. The structure reflects the fact that it is a bespoke exemption order for a particular taxpayer and specific foreign dividend sources.

In practice, the “structure” for a lawyer is not only the text of the Order but also the incorporated external document—the letter of approval dated 15 January 2010. Even though that letter is not reproduced in the Order, it is expressly made a condition of the exemption. Therefore, the effective legal framework is: the Order + the approval letter’s terms + the underlying authority in the Income Tax Act.

Who Does This Legislation Apply To?

The Order applies to Fairbanks Holdings Pte Ltd only. It is not a general exemption available to all companies meeting certain criteria. The exemption is granted to a named taxpayer, and it relates to dividends received from two named Malaysian companies.

Accordingly, other Singapore companies that receive dividends from Malaysian subsidiaries should not assume the exemption applies to them. Even if they have similar shareholding percentages or receive dividends from Malaysian companies, the exemption’s legal scope is limited by the Order’s specific identification of the taxpayer and dividend sources. For other taxpayers, relief would typically depend on whether a similar exemption order exists or whether they qualify under other provisions of the Income Tax Act and related subsidiary legislation.

Why Is This Legislation Important?

Although the Order is short, it is significant for practitioners because it demonstrates how Singapore administers foreign dividend relief through ministerial orders under the Income Tax Act. For a company like Fairbanks Holdings Pte Ltd, the exemption can materially affect its effective tax rate and cash tax outcomes by removing Singapore tax on qualifying foreign dividends.

From an enforcement and compliance standpoint, the Order’s most important practical feature is the incorporation of conditions from the 15 January 2010 approval letter. This means that tax treatment is not determined solely by the ownership percentages and the identity of the foreign companies. It also depends on whether the taxpayer satisfies the approval’s terms. Lawyers advising on tax positions should therefore obtain and review the approval letter, confirm ongoing compliance, and ensure that dividend receipts and documentation are properly maintained.

Finally, the Order’s specificity highlights a broader lesson for tax practice in Singapore: when relief is granted by order, the legal entitlement is often narrow and must be interpreted strictly. For audit readiness, counsel should map each dividend receipt to the Order’s conditions—particularly the shareholding percentages and the identity of the dividend-paying companies—and confirm that the “received in Singapore” requirement is met in the relevant accounting and tax periods.

  • Income Tax Act (Chapter 134) — in particular, section 13(12) (the authorising provision referenced in the Order)
  • Income Tax Act timeline / amendments — for contextual changes affecting foreign income exemptions and the operation of section 13(12)

Source Documents

This article provides an overview of the Income Tax (Exemption of Foreign Income) (No. 2) Order 2010 for legal research and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice. Readers should consult the official text for authoritative provisions.

Written by Sushant Shukla

More in

Legal Wires

Legal Wires

Stay ahead of the legal curve. Get expert analysis and regulatory updates natively delivered to your inbox.

Success! Please check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription.