Part of a comprehensive analysis of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
All Parts in This Series
Key Provisions and Their Purpose under Part 4 OFFENCES of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Part 4 of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990 (hereinafter “the Act”) is dedicated to establishing a comprehensive legal framework for offences related to the employment of foreign manpower in Singapore. This Part spans sections 20 to 24 and addresses offences by bodies corporate, powers of arrest without warrant, general offences concerning foreign employees, restrictions on receipt of moneys, proscribed manpower-related practices, abetment of offences, orders for payment of proceeds of crime, and complaint procedures by employment inspectors.
The primary purpose of these provisions is to regulate and enforce compliance with the Act by defining specific offences, assigning liabilities, empowering enforcement authorities, prescribing penalties, and setting procedural rules. This ensures that employers, employment agencies, and other stakeholders adhere strictly to the legal standards designed to protect foreign employees and maintain the integrity of Singapore’s manpower system.
"PART 4 OFFENCES" including sections 20 to 24, covering offences by bodies corporate, power to arrest without warrant, general offences, restrictions on receipt of moneys, proscribed manpower-related practices, abetment of offences, orders for payment of proceeds of crime, and complaint by employment inspector. — Part 4, Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify source in source document →
By codifying these offences and enforcement mechanisms, the legislature aims to deter unlawful conduct, facilitate effective investigation and prosecution, and uphold fair employment practices for foreign manpower.
Definitions in Part 4: Clarifying Roles and Responsibilities
Section 20(6) of the Act provides precise definitions for key terms such as “officer” and “partner” to clarify who may be held liable under offences committed by bodies corporate or unincorporated associations. This is crucial for attributing responsibility within complex organizational structures.
"In this section — 'officer' — (a) in relation to a body corporate, means any director, partner, member of the committee of management, chief executive, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the body corporate and includes any person purporting to act in any such capacity; or (b) in relation to an unincorporated association (other than a partnership), means the president, the secretary, or any member of the committee of the unincorporated association, or any person holding a position analogous to that of president, secretary or member of a committee and includes any person purporting to act in any such capacity; 'partner' includes a person purporting to act as a partner." — Section 20(6), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
This provision exists to ensure that individuals who hold positions of authority or act in such capacities cannot evade liability by hiding behind the corporate veil or organizational form. It promotes accountability by extending liability to those who effectively control or manage the entity involved in the offence.
Penalties for Non-Compliance: Deterrence and Enforcement
The Act prescribes a graduated scale of penalties under various sections to address the seriousness of different offences. These penalties include fines, imprisonment, and in some cases, caning, reflecting the legislature’s intent to impose strict sanctions to deter violations.
Section 22(1) outlines general offences with penalties ranging from fines up to $20,000 and imprisonment terms up to two years:
"22.(1)...shall be liable on conviction — (h) ... fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both; (i) ... fine not exceeding $20,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both; (j) ... fine not exceeding $10,000." — Section 22(1), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Section 22A(2) addresses restrictions on receipt of moneys, imposing penalties of up to $30,000 fine or two years imprisonment or both:
"22A.(2) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $30,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both." — Section 22A(2), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify Section 22A in source document →
Section 22B(1) targets proscribed manpower-related practices with a minimum imprisonment term of six months, up to two years, and fines up to $6,000. Caning may also be imposed for multiple offences under section 22B(2):
"22B.(1) ... shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment for a presumptive minimum term of not less than 6 months and not more than 2 years and shall also be liable to a fine not exceeding $6,000." — Section 22B(1), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify Section 22B in source document →
Section 23(1) extends liability to those who abet offences, ensuring that accomplices are equally punishable:
"23.(1) Any person who abets the commission of an offence under this Act shall be guilty of the offence and shall be liable on conviction to be punished with the punishment provided for that offence." — Section 23(1), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify Section 23 in source document →
Section 23A empowers courts to order payment of proceeds of crime, requiring offenders to pay sums equal to benefits obtained through offences:
"23A.(1) ... the court shall ... order the person to pay ... a sum which is equal to the amount of the sum or other benefit ... the person deducted or received ... or obtained or received for obtaining the work pass." — Section 23A(1), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify Section 23A in source document →
These penalties exist to provide a strong deterrent against exploitation and unlawful practices involving foreign manpower, to punish offenders appropriately, and to recover illicit gains, thereby protecting the rights and welfare of foreign employees.
Cross-References to Other Legislation: Integrating Enforcement and Protections
The Act’s provisions in Part 4 are closely linked with other legislation to ensure coherent enforcement and protection mechanisms. These cross-references facilitate procedural consistency and clarify the scope of lawful conduct.
For example, section 21G(1)(a) references the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 for complaint handling:
"21G.(1)(a) ... be dealt with in accordance with section 364(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010;" — Section 21G(1)(a), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify Section 21G in source document →
Section 22A(3)(c) and (e) incorporate provisions from the Employment Act 1968 and Employment Agencies Act 1958 respectively, regulating salary deductions and lawful fees:
"22A.(3)(c) where sections 26 to 32 of the Employment Act 1968 apply to the foreign employee, the whole or part of any deduction from the salary of the foreign employee authorised to be made under those sections;" — Section 22A(3)(c), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify Section 22A in source document →
"22A.(3)(e) the whole or part of any fee, remuneration, profit or compensation that a licensee under the Employment Agencies Act 1958 may lawfully charge the foreign employee and receive under that Act," — Section 22A(3)(e), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify Section 22A in source document →
Section 23A(2) further integrates evidence and compensation orders under the Criminal Procedure Code 2010:
"23A.(2)(a) any relevant evidence admitted in the proceedings against the defendant for the offence concerned; and (b) any order for the payment of compensation by the defendant ... under section 359 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010." — Section 23A(2), Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify Section 23A in source document →
Finally, section 24 mandates that complaints by employment inspectors be processed in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code 2010:
"24. For the purpose of section 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010, on receiving the complaint in writing and signed by any employment inspector, the Magistrate must proceed to issue a summons or warrant in accordance with section 153 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010." — Section 24, Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990
Verify Section 24 in source document →
These cross-references exist to harmonize the enforcement of foreign manpower regulations with established criminal and employment laws, ensuring procedural fairness, clarity on lawful deductions and fees, and effective prosecution of offences.
Conclusion
Part 4 of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act 1990 is a critical component in Singapore’s legal framework governing foreign manpower. It defines offences, clarifies liability, prescribes penalties, and sets out enforcement procedures to protect foreign employees and maintain lawful employment practices. The detailed definitions ensure accountability at all organizational levels, while the penalties serve as a deterrent against exploitation and unlawful conduct. Cross-references to other statutes integrate the Act within Singapore’s broader legal system, promoting consistency and fairness in enforcement.
Sections Covered in This Analysis
- Section 20(6) – Definitions of “officer” and “partner”
- Section 21G(1)(a) – Complaint procedures referencing Criminal Procedure Code 2010
- Section 22(1) – General offences and penalties
- Section 22A(2), (3)(c), (3)(e) – Restrictions on receipt of moneys and lawful deductions
- Section 22B(1), (2) – Proscribed manpower-related practices and penalties
- Section 23(1) – Abetment of offences
- Section 23A(1), (2) – Orders for payment of proceeds of crime and evidentiary provisions
- Section 24 – Complaint procedures by employment inspectors referencing Criminal Procedure Code 2010
Source Documents
For the authoritative text, consult SSO.