Part of a comprehensive analysis of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
All Parts in This Series
Understanding Contempt of Court under the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016: Key Provisions and Their Purpose
The Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 (hereinafter "the Act") serves a critical role in safeguarding the integrity and proper functioning of Singapore’s judicial system. Part 2 of the Act specifically addresses various forms of contempt of court, outlining the acts that constitute contempt and prescribing the framework for enforcement. This article provides a detailed analysis of the key provisions in Part 2, their definitions, penalties, and relevant cross-references to other legislation, explaining the rationale behind each provision.
Defining Contempt of Court: Scope and Purpose of Key Provisions
Part 2 of the Act meticulously defines multiple types of contempt of court, aiming to uphold public confidence in the administration of justice and ensure the smooth operation of court proceedings. The provisions cover scandalising the court, prejudgment of pending cases, interference with court participants, disobedience of court orders, unauthorised recordings, and the liability of corporations and associations.
"Any person who— (a) scandalises the court by intentionally publishing any matter or doing any act that— (i) imputes improper motives to or impugns the integrity, propriety or impartiality of any court; and (ii) poses a risk that public confidence in the administration of justice would be undermined; (b) intentionally publishes any matter that— (i) prejudges an issue in a court proceeding that is pending and such prejudgment prejudices, interferes with, or poses a real risk of prejudice to or interference with, the course of any court proceeding that is pending; or (ii) otherwise prejudices, interferes with, or poses a real risk of prejudice to or interference with, the course of any court proceeding that is pending; (c) intentionally interferes with (by intimidation or otherwise) or hinders another person’s access to or ability to appear in court, knowing that this person is a party, witness, advocate or judge in ongoing court proceedings; (d) intentionally offers any insult or causes any interruption or obstruction to any judge of any court, while the judge is sitting in any stage of a court proceeding; ... commits a contempt of court." — Section 3(1)
Purpose: These provisions exist to protect the judiciary from attacks that could erode public trust and to prevent external influences from disrupting court proceedings. By criminalising scandalising the court and prejudgment, the Act ensures that judicial decisions are respected and that ongoing cases are not compromised by external commentary or interference. The prohibition against insulting or obstructing judges while in session preserves the dignity and authority of the court.
Clarifying Key Definitions to Ensure Precise Application
To avoid ambiguity and ensure precise enforcement, Part 2 provides detailed definitions of terms critical to understanding and applying the contempt provisions. These definitions clarify who is protected, who may be held liable, and the scope of court proceedings covered.
"In this section, “advocate” means any of the following persons who represents any party in any court proceedings: (a) an advocate and solicitor of the Supreme Court; (b) a person who is admitted to practise as an advocate and solicitor under section 15 of the Legal Profession Act 1966; (c) a lawyer (non-practitioner) who holds a provisional practising certificate issued under section 18 of that Act; (d) a foreign lawyer who is registered under section 36P of that Act." — Section 3(8)
Verify Section 3 in source document →
"“aggrieved party” means a party to the relevant proceedings for whose benefit any judgment, decree, direction, order, writ or other process of a court is given, made or issued, or any undertaking to a court is given, in proceedings other than a proceeding against a person in respect of any offence; “undertaking given to a court” includes an implied undertaking given to a court." — Section 4(9)
Verify Section 4 in source document →
"“corporation” includes a limited liability partnership within the meaning of section 2(1) of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2005; “officer”, in relation to a corporation, means any director, partner, chief executive, manager, secretary or other similar officer of the corporation, and includes— (a) any person purporting to act in any such capacity; and (b) for a corporation whose affairs are managed by its members, any of those members as if the member was a director of the corporation; “state of mind” of a person includes— (a) the knowledge, intention, opinion, belief or purpose of the person; and (b) the person’s reasons for the intention, opinion, belief or purpose." — Section 6(7)
Verify Section 6 in source document →
"“officer”, in relation to an unincorporated association (other than a partnership), means the president, the secretary, or any member of the committee of the unincorporated association, and includes— (a) any person holding a position analogous to that of president, secretary or member of a committee of the unincorporated association; and (b) any person purporting to act in any such capacity; “partner” includes a person purporting to act as a partner; “state of mind” of a person includes— (a) the knowledge, intention, opinion, belief or purpose of the person; and (b) the person’s reasons for the intention, opinion, belief or purpose." — Section 7(7)
Verify Section 7 in source document →
"“court proceedings” includes court proceedings, or any part of court proceedings, conducted through any electronic means of communication;" — Section 5(5)(a)
Verify Section 5 in source document →
Purpose: These definitions ensure that the scope of the Act is clear and comprehensive. For example, defining "advocate" inclusively ensures that all legal representatives, including foreign lawyers and non-practitioners with provisional certificates, are covered. The inclusion of electronic court proceedings reflects modern judicial practices, ensuring the Act remains relevant in the digital age. Defining "state of mind" is crucial for establishing intent or knowledge, which is often necessary to prove contempt.
Penalties and Enforcement Mechanisms for Contempt of Court
While Part 2 does not explicitly enumerate specific penalties for contempt, it establishes that those found guilty of contempt are liable to be punished accordingly. The Act also preserves the inherent powers of the courts to enforce compliance and maintain order.
"Where contempt of court is committed... shall be guilty of the same contempt of court as is the corporation... and shall be liable on being found guilty of contempt of court to be punished accordingly." — Section 6(2)
Verify Section 6 in source document →
"Nothing in this Act limits or affects the inherent powers of a court, including but not limited to— (c) the coercive power of a court to detain a person in custody until that person complies with the court’s order or direction for a period not exceeding the maximum term of imprisonment specified in section 12;" — Section 9(c)
Verify Section 9 in source document →
Purpose: These provisions exist to empower courts to effectively deal with contempt, which is essential for enforcing court orders and protecting judicial authority. By preserving inherent judicial powers, the Act ensures that courts can impose sanctions such as detention or fines to compel compliance and deter misconduct.
Cross-References to Other Legislation: Ensuring Consistency and Legal Coherence
The Act cross-references several other statutes to maintain consistency within Singapore’s legal framework and clarify the relationship between contempt provisions and other laws.
"an advocate and solicitor of the Supreme Court; (b) a person who is admitted to practise as an advocate and solicitor under section 15 of the Legal Profession Act 1966; (c) a lawyer (non-practitioner) who holds a provisional practising certificate issued under section 18 of that Act; (d) a foreign lawyer who is registered under section 36P of that Act." — Section 3(8)
Verify Section 3 in source document →
"“corporation” includes a limited liability partnership within the meaning of section 2(1) of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2005;" — Section 6(7)
Verify Section 6 in source document →
"To avoid doubt, this section does not affect the application of— (a) Chapters 5 and 5A of the Penal Code 1871; or (b) the Evidence Act 1893 or any other law or practice regarding the admissibility of evidence." — Sections 6(4), 7(4)
Verify source in source document →
Purpose: These cross-references clarify that the contempt provisions operate alongside other relevant laws without superseding them. For instance, referencing the Legal Profession Act ensures that the definition of "advocate" aligns with existing professional standards. The inclusion of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act broadens the scope of corporate liability. Explicitly stating that the Penal Code and Evidence Act remain applicable prevents conflicts and preserves established legal principles regarding criminal offences and evidence admissibility.
Conclusion
Part 2 of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016 plays a pivotal role in protecting the sanctity of Singapore’s judicial system by defining contempt of court and providing mechanisms for enforcement. The detailed definitions ensure clarity and comprehensive coverage, while the preservation of inherent judicial powers guarantees effective enforcement. Cross-references to other legislation maintain legal coherence and uphold professional standards. Collectively, these provisions reinforce public confidence in the administration of justice and uphold the rule of law.
Sections Covered in This Analysis
- Section 3(1), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
- Section 3(8), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
- Section 4(9), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
- Section 5(5)(a), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
- Section 6(2), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
- Section 6(4), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
- Section 6(7), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
- Section 7(4), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
- Section 7(7), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
- Section 9(c), Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016
Source Documents
For the authoritative text, consult SSO.