LITT
Try LITT free
YOUSSEF ISSA WARD v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2015] DIFC CFI 001 — Anti-suit injunction and cheque return order (25 May 2015)
The Claimant, Youssef Issa Ward, sought an urgent court order to prohibit the Defendant, DAMAC Park Towers Company, from pursuing criminal charges related to a dishonoured cheque in the amount of AED 448,815.
YOUSSEF ISSA WARD v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2014] DIFC CFI 001 — Restitution for wrongful termination of a Reservation Agreement (10 May 2015)
The dispute centered on the off-plan purchase of a commercial unit in the Park Towers Development within the DIFC. The Claimant, Youssef Issa Ward, sought the return of funds paid toward the unit after the Defendant, DAMAC Park Towers Company Limited, terminated the Reservation Agreement, alleging…
YOUSSEF ISSA WARD v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2014] DIFC CFI 001 — Procedural directions following Pre Trial Review (17 November 2014)
The litigation involves a dispute between Youssef Issa Ward and Damac Park Towers Company, which reached a critical juncture requiring judicial intervention regarding the scope of the pleadings.
MR YOUSSEF ISSA WARD v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2014] DIFC CFI 001 — Case Management Order (03 April 2014)
This procedural order establishes the definitive timeline for the progression of civil litigation between Mr. Youssef Issa Ward and Damac Park Towers Company Limited and Damac Star Properties LLC, setting the stage for a trial scheduled for late 2014.
YAHYA AL SHAYKH v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2012] DIFC CFI 001 — Procedural strike-out for non-payment of court fees (17 December 2012)
The dispute centered on the failure of the Claimant, Yahya Al Shaykh, to meet the financial requirements necessary to maintain an active claim within the DIFC Court system. Specifically, the Claimant failed to settle outstanding court fees totaling US$ 3,000.
YAHYA AL SHAYKH v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2012] DIFC CFI 001 — Pre-trial procedural management (16 September 2012)
The litigation involves a direct claim brought by Yahya Al Shaykh against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority. While the underlying substantive merits of the claim are not detailed in this specific order, the document confirms that the matter reached a stage requiring rigorous…
YAHYA AL SHAYKH v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2012] DIFC CFI 001 — Pre-trial review procedural directions (13 September 2012)
The litigation under case number CFI-001-2012 involves a claim brought by Yahya Al Shaykh against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority. While the substantive merits of the underlying claim are not detailed in this specific pre-trial review order, the court’s focus is directed toward…
YAHYA AL SHAYKH v DIFC AUTHORITY [2012] DIFC CFI 001 — Case management and procedural timeline (14 June 2012)
A foundational procedural order establishing the rigorous case management framework for the litigation between Yahya Al Shaykh and the DIFC Authority.
DIFC AUTHORITY v SOPHIA AL SHAYKH [2012] DIFC CFI 001 — Strike out of third-party employment claim (12 February 2012)
The Court of First Instance reinforces the doctrine of privity of contract, confirming that dependents lack standing to sue for employment benefits absent express contractual intent to confer enforceable rights.
NOEL PATRICK GAFFNEY v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2011] DIFC CFI 001 — Default judgment for real estate investment recovery (14 April 2011)
The lawsuit centered on a real estate investment dispute involving the Claimants, Noel Patrick Gaffney and Lorna Anne Gaffney, and the Respondent, Damac Park Towers Company Limited (formerly known as Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited).
SAAD Financial Advisory Services Limited [2010] DIFC CFI 001 — Winding up and liquidator appointment (23 February 2010)
The petition for the winding up of SAAD Financial Advisory Services Limited (Registered No. 0274) was brought before the Court of First Instance by the company itself, acting through its sole shareholder, LA Investments Limited.
Rasmala Investments Limited v Rana Banat and Others [2009] DIFC CFI 001-006/2009 — The exclusivity of DIFC Employment Law (06 April 2009)
The dispute originated from six separate claims filed by former employees of Rasmala Investments Limited, who alleged that their termination constituted unfair dismissal. The claimants sought various liquidated sums as damages, arguing that their employment rights were protected under the broader…
RANA BANAT v RASMALA INVESTMENTS [2009] DIFC CFI 001 — Appeal against Small Claims Tribunal judgment (02 March 2009)
The dispute originated in the Small Claims Tribunal (SCT), where Rana Banat initiated a claim against Rasmala Investments Limited. While the specific underlying merits of the initial claim were not detailed in the final order, the matter escalated to the Court of First Instance (CFI) following an…
RANA BANAT v RASMALA INVESTMENTS [2009] DIFC CFI 001 — Procedural dismissal of interlocutory application (18 February 2009)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the threshold for interlocutory applications, emphasizing the necessity of substantive legal grounding and timely procedural conduct.
RANA BANAT v RASMALA INVESTMENTS [2009] DIFC CFI 001 — Stay of execution pending appeal (09 February 2009)
The dispute centers on the enforcement of a prior judicial order issued against Rasmala Investments Limited. Following an initial ruling by H.E. Justice Omar Al Muhairi on 11 January 2009, Rasmala Investments Limited sought to challenge the underlying decision through the appellate process.
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v HUSAM A. ABU-AMARA [2007] DIFC CFI 001 — Regulatory discontinuance and discharge of injunctions (29 October 2007)
The litigation involved a broad regulatory enforcement action initiated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) against Husam A. Abu-Amara and several corporate entities, including the 7th Defendant, Time Telecommunications.
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v HUSAM A. ABU-AMARA [2007] DIFC CFI 001 — Adjournment and continuation of regulatory injunction (24 July 2007)
The litigation, initiated under case number CFI 1/2007, involves the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) acting against a wide array of defendants, including Husam A. Abu-Amara, Globalstar Telecom & Technology, and Time Telecommunications.
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v HUSAM A. ABU-AMARA [2007] DIFC CFI 001 — Regulatory stay of proceedings (06 May 2007)
The lawsuit originated from the DFSA’s regulatory mandate to police unauthorized financial services within the DIFC jurisdiction. The DFSA sought to restrain the defendants from making representations regarding financial exchanges and related services without the requisite authorization.
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v HUSAM A. ABU-AMARA [2007] DIFC CFI 001 — Discharge of regulatory injunctions (30 April 2007)
The lawsuit concerns a regulatory enforcement action brought by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) against a series of defendants, including Husam A. Abu-Amara and Globalstar Telecom & Technology, alongside several other entities such as Select Solutions LLC and AI Global Resources.
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v HUSAM A. ABU-AMARA [2007] DIFC CFI 001 — Procedural bifurcation and adjournment scheduling (16 April 2007)
The lawsuit represents a regulatory enforcement action brought by the DFSA, the independent regulator of financial services conducted in or from the DIFC. The dispute centers on the activities of Husam A.
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v HUSAM A. ABU-AMARA [2007] DIFC CFI 001 — Continuation of regulatory injunction (27 February 2007)
The lawsuit concerns a high-stakes regulatory enforcement action brought by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) against Husam A. Abu-Amara and seven corporate and individual co-defendants, including Globalstar Telecom & Technology, Ameerdeen Abdul Majid Thanikkodi, Syed Mohamed A/L Kabdul…
THE DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v HUSAM A. ABU-AMARA [2007] DIFC CFI 001 — Regulatory injunction against unauthorized financial exchange representations (14 February 2007)
The DIFC Court of First Instance issued an urgent, without-notice interim injunction to halt the dissemination of fraudulent claims regarding the existence of unauthorized financial exchanges within the DIFC, protecting the integrity of the financial services sector.
NIRVED v NEHA [2024] DIFC SCT 319 — Challenging DIFC jurisdiction over mainland employment contracts (17 September 2024)
The Small Claims Tribunal clarifies that physical presence in a DIFC office does not override the legal status of an employer when determining jurisdictional gateways under the Judicial Authority Law.
NARCISO v NAIRN [2024] DIFC SCT 085 — Breach of landlord's obligation to provide premises ready for use (21 May 2024)
The dispute arose from a failed commercial tenancy arrangement concerning a unit located within the DIFC. Following the purchase of a salon business known as "Nash" from a third party, the Claimant, Narciso, entered into a new lease agreement with the Defendant, Nairn, for the premises previously…