LITTLITT Try LITT free
uae-difc-cases

IDBI BANK v PRINTER AND STATIONARY INDUSTRIES [2021] DIFC CFI 003 — Extension of time for service of proceedings (06 May 2021)

The litigation involves a complex multi-party dispute initiated by IDBI Bank Limited against five distinct respondents: Printer and Stationary Industries LLC, Union Emirates Printing & Publishing- F.Z.C, Royal Printing Press LLC, Shijin Mathew, and Mathew Scaria Vadhyanath.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

IDBI BANK v PRINTER AND STATIONARY INDUSTRIES [2020] DIFC CFI 003 — procedural extension and alternative service (31 May 2020)

IDBI Bank Limited initiated proceedings under CFI 003/2020 against a group of corporate and individual defendants, including Printer and Stationary Industries LLC, Union Emirates Printing & Publishing- F.Z.C, Royal Printing Press LLC, Shijin Mathew, and Mathew Scaria Vadhyanath.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v WINTERCAP SA [2020] DIFC CFI 003 — Variation of freezing order for asset re-materialisation (20 December 2020)

The First Notice Party, Prometheus Capital Finance Limited, sought a variation of the Continuing Freezing Order originally issued by H.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi on March 4, 2019.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v WINTERCAP SA [2019] DIFC CFI 003 — Continuation of interim freezing order pending service and representation (03 February 2019)

The lawsuit involves an application by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to freeze assets held within the jurisdiction of the Dubai International Financial Centre.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

ALISTAIR JAMES COMPANY v SAKSON DRILLING & OIL SERVICES [2017] DIFC CFI 003 — Compelling document production via Redfern Schedule (26 July 2017)

The dispute centers on a request for document production initiated by the Claimant, Alistair James Company, against the Defendant, Sakson Drilling & Oil Services. Following a Case Management Order issued on 1 May 2017, the parties were governed by the standard procedural requirements for discovery…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

ALISTAIR JAMES COMPANY v SAKSON DRILLING AND OIL SERVICES [2017] DIFC CFI 003 — Procedural framework for commercial dispute resolution (01 May 2017)

The litigation involves a commercial dispute between Alistair James Company Limited and Sakson Drilling and Oil Services DMCC. While the specific underlying contractual or tortious claims are not detailed in this procedural order, the matter is categorized under the Commercial practice area and…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES v ROWDHAT NEAMA TRANSPORTING & GENERAL CONTRACTING [2020] DIFC CFI 003 — Service by publication for default judgment enforcement (12 November 2020)

The dispute centers on a defaulted loan agreement between Caterpillar Financial Services (Dubai) Limited and the defendants, Rowdhat Neama Transporting & General Contracting Establishment and Ali Abdalla Nasir Abdalla Bukallah Loutah.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES v ROWDHAT NEAMA TRANSPORTING & GENERAL CONTRACTING ESTABLISHMENT [2020] DIFC CFI 003 — Amended Default Judgment for loan recovery (07 January 2020)

The dispute centered on the recovery of a significant outstanding loan balance and the enforcement of security interests under a credit facility agreement. Caterpillar Financial Services (Dubai) Limited initiated proceedings against Rowdhat Neama Transporting & General Contracting Establishment as…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

LIMESTONE RESIDENTIAL BODY CORPORATE v UNION PROPERTIES [2015] DIFC CFI 003 — Order of Discontinuance (01 June 2015)

The dispute centered on the legal relationship between the Limestone Residential Body Corporate and Union Properties PJSC, a major developer operating within the Dubai real estate sector.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

SUHAIL RAZA BADAMI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2015] DIFC CFI 003 — Order of Discontinuance (12 April 2015)

The litigation, which had been active since early 2013, reached its conclusion through a formal Order of Discontinuance issued by the DIFC Court of First Instance. The dispute, centered on real estate investment obligations, had previously undergone extensive case management and document production…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

SUHAIL REZA BADAMI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2014] DIFC CFI 003 — Procedural management of late-stage amendments and trial adjournments (26 March 2014)

The litigation between Suhail Reza Badami and Daman Real Estate Capital Partners centers on a high-stakes real estate dispute involving a Sale and Purchase Agreement. As the trial approached, the proceedings were interrupted by a tactical collision of applications: the Defendant sought to re-amend…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

SUHAIL REZA BADAMI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 003 — Procedural amendment of particulars of claim (21 October 2013)

The litigation involves a dispute between Suhail Reza Badami (the Claimant) and Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited (the Defendant) concerning the scope of the Claimant’s pleadings.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

SUHAIL REZA BADAMI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 003 — Procedural adjustment of expert evidence timelines (26 September 2013)

The dispute between Suhail Reza Badami and Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited concerns a real estate matter currently before the DIFC Court of First Instance. The claimant, Suhail Reza Badami, initiated an application on 16 September 2013, identified as CFI 003-2013/1, seeking a formal…

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read
uae-difc-cases

SUHAIL RAZA BADAMI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 003 — Document production and disclosure obligations (25 June 2013)

The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies the threshold for document production, emphasizing the necessity of demonstrating specific relevance and materiality under the Rules of the DIFC Courts.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

SUHAIL RAZA BADAMI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 003 — Case Management Order (05 May 2013)

The litigation involves a real estate dispute brought by Suhail Raza Badami against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited. While the specific underlying merits—such as the nature of the property investment or the alleged breach of contract—are not detailed in the procedural order, the case is…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

SUHAIL RAZA BADAMI v DAMAN REAL ESTATE CAPITAL PARTNERS [2013] DIFC CFI 003 — Procedural framework for real estate litigation (19 February 2013)

The lawsuit involves a civil claim brought by Suhail Raza Badami against Daman Real Estate Capital Partners Limited. While the specific underlying cause of action is not detailed in this procedural order, the matter is categorized within the real estate sector, suggesting a dispute arising from…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MARWAN AHMAD LUTFI v THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2015] DIFC CFI 003 — Costs assessment following employment claim dismissal (03 November 2015)

The litigation arose from the termination of the Claimant’s employment with the Defendant, which occurred on 4 December 2011. The Claimant, who held a senior management position, sought extensive legal remedies following his dismissal.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MARWAN AHMAD LUTFI v THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2012] DIFC CFI 003 — Employment termination and the 'Employment of Relatives' policy (04 August 2013)

Marwan Ahmad Lutfi (ML) initiated proceedings against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority (DIFCA) following his dismissal, which the Authority justified by citing its 'Employment of Relatives' (EOR) policy.

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MARWAN AHMAD LUTFI v DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2012] DIFC CFI 003 — Procedural scheduling and document production timelines (28 August 2012)

The litigation involves a claim brought by Marwan Ahmad Lutfi against the Dubai International Financial Centre Authority (DIFCA). While the substantive merits of the underlying claim remain outside the scope of this specific procedural order, the case represents a significant dispute involving the…

Sushant Shukla· ·5 min read
uae-difc-cases

MARWAN AHMAD LUTFI v THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE AUTHORITY [2012] DIFC CFI 003 — Procedural extension and cost assessment (09 May 2012)

The dispute in CFI 003/2012 centered on the management of the litigation timeline, specifically the Defendant’s need for additional time to prepare and file its Defence. Marwan Ahmad Lutfi, acting as the Claimant, found himself in a procedural standoff with the Dubai International Financial Centre…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

AMLAK SKY GARDENS v RIBAL YOUSSEF MAHDY [2011] DIFC CFI 003 — Correction of clerical errors in default judgment (15 December 2011)

The dispute centers on a real estate recovery action initiated by Amlak Sky Gardens L.L.C against Ribal Youssef Mahdy. Following the issuance of a default judgment on 17 July 2011, the Claimant identified inaccuracies within the record that hindered the enforcement of the court’s decision.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

PETER EVANS & ORS v UNION PROPERTIES [2010] DIFC CFI 003 — Disclosure of Index Tower contractual documentation (05 July 2010)

The dispute centers on a group of investors, Peter Evans & Ors, who initiated proceedings against Union Properties PJSC concerning their purchase of units in The Index Tower. The claimants sought extensive disclosure of documentation to clarify the contractual timeline and the regulatory approval…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

PETER EVANS & ORS v UNION PROPERTIES [2010] DIFC CFI 003 — Procedural adjournment of disclosure application (24 March 2010)

The litigation in CFI 003/2010 centers on a pre-trial procedural impasse regarding the production of evidence. The Claimants, Peter Evans & Ors, initiated an application on 25 January 2010 seeking a court order for the disclosure of documents held by the Defendant, Union Properties.

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read
uae-difc-cases

PETER EVANS & ORS v UNION PROPERTIES [2010] DIFC CFI 003 — Procedural compliance regarding statements of truth (11 February 2010)

The litigation involves a Part 8 claim initiated by Peter Evans and others against Union Properties PJSC. Upon filing the claim form on 25 January 2010, the claimants recognized that the procedural rules governing the verification of court documents required specific authorization if a single…

Sushant Shukla· ·6 min read