LITT
Try LITT free
AMIT DATTANI v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2019] DIFC CFI 034 — Consent order dismissing the Claimants' April 2019 application (08 July 2019)
A procedural resolution in the long-standing dispute regarding real estate development obligations in the DIFC.
Amit Dattani v Damac Park Towers Company [2014] DIFC CFI 034 — Consent order for real estate contract damages (30 December 2014)
The litigation involved four claimants seeking recovery of funds from Damac Park Towers Company Limited, formerly trading as Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited. The dispute centered on contractual obligations related to property investments within the DIFC jurisdiction.
DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY v DATTANI [2014] DIFC CFI 034 — Permission to appeal regarding SPA construction and procedural fairness (01 December 2014)
Justice Roger Giles clarifies the threshold for appellate intervention in DIFC real estate disputes, granting partial leave to appeal against Chief Justice Michael Hwang’s judgment concerning the termination of Sale and Purchase Agreements.
AMIT DATTANI v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2012] DIFC CFI 034 — Real estate developer liability for delayed handover (20 July 2014)
The dispute centered on the failure of Damac Park Towers Company to deliver possession and occupation of an apartment and a retail unit within the Park Towers development. The Claimants—Amit Dattani, Nitin Jobanputra, Masood ur Rahman, and Shemhon Iftakhar—argued that the developer breached the…
AMIT DATTANI v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2013] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural extension for closing submissions (19 December 2013)
The litigation under case number CFI 034/2012 involves a multi-party claim brought by Amit Dattani, Nitin Jobanputra, Masood Ur Rahman, and Shemhon Iftakhar against Damac Park Towers Company Limited, which was previously known as Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited.
AMIT DATTANI v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2013] DIFC CFI 034 — Pre-trial procedural directions for real estate litigation (21 October 2013)
The litigation involves four individual claimants—Mr. Amit Dattani, Mr. Nitin Jobanputra, Mr. Masood Ur Rahman, and Mr. Shemhon Iftakhar—who have initiated proceedings against Damac Park Towers Company Limited, formerly known as Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited.
AMIT DATTANI v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2012] DIFC CFI 034 — Immediate judgment denied due to disputed termination notices (20 October 2013)
The dispute centers on two consolidated claims involving residential and retail property purchase agreements within the DIFC. The Claimants alleged that the developer, Damac Park Towers Company, failed to deliver the units by the contractually mandated completion dates, thereby triggering a right…
AMIT DATTANI v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2013] DIFC CFI 034 — procedural finality in real estate litigation (14 March 2013)
The litigation involves a consolidated claim brought by four individual claimants—Amit Dattani, Nitin Jobanputra, Masood Ur Rahman, and Shemhon Iftakhar—against Damac Park Towers Company Limited, formerly known as Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited.
MR AMIT DATTANI v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2013] DIFC CFI 034 — Case Management Order (19 February 2013)
This Case Management Order establishes the procedural roadmap for a multi-party real estate dispute, mandating strict adherence to disclosure and expert evidence timelines to facilitate a November 2013 trial.
AMIT DATTANI v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2013] DIFC CFI 034 — Consolidation of real estate investor claims (05 February 2013)
The dispute concerns a series of claims brought by individual investors—Amit Dattani, Nitin Jobanputra, Masood Ur Rahman, and Shemhon Iftakhar—against Damac Park Towers Company Limited, an entity previously known as Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited.
AMIT DATTANI v DAMAC PARK TOWERS COMPANY [2013] DIFC CFI 034 — procedural consolidation and withdrawal of jurisdiction challenge (06 January 2013)
The litigation, initiated by Mr. Amit Dattani and Mr. Nitin Jobanputra, centered on a dispute with Damac Park Towers Company Limited, formerly known as Damac Real Estate Asset Management Company Limited.
HOPKINS ARCHITECTS DUBAI v DUBAI PROPERTIES [2011] DIFC CFI 034 — Discontinuation of cross-claims via consent order (17 August 2011)
The litigation involved a commercial dispute between Hopkins Architects Dubai and Dubai Properties, which had escalated to the point of a formal claim and a subsequent counterclaim. While the specific underlying contractual grievances—likely relating to architectural services, project delivery, or…
HOPKINS ARCHITECTS DUBAI v DUBAI PROPERTIES [2011] DIFC CFI 034 — Consent Order vacating trial and staying proceedings (29 March 2011)
The litigation involved a commercial dispute between Hopkins Architects Dubai Ltd and Dubai Properties LLC, centering on contractual obligations within the construction and design sector.
HOPKINS ARCHITECTS DUBAI v DUBAI PROPERTIES [2009] DIFC CFI 034 — Dismissal of procedural application (20 January 2011)
The litigation between Hopkins Architects Dubai and Dubai Properties represents a commercial dispute arising within the DIFC jurisdiction, centered on contractual obligations and professional services provided by the claimant.
HOPKINS ARCHITECTS DUBAI v DUBAI PROPERTIES [2010] DIFC CFI 034 — Stay of counterclaims pending third-party liability (28 October 2010)
The dispute in CFI 034/2009 centers on a construction-related contractual disagreement between the claimant, Hopkins Architects Dubai Ltd, and the defendant, Dubai Properties LLC. The litigation reached a procedural juncture where the parties sought to manage the scope of the ongoing proceedings…
HOPKINS ARCHITECTS DUBAI v DUBAI PROPERTIES [2010] DIFC CFI 034 — Procedural extension for filing a Defence (24 June 2010)
Justice Sir John Chadwick grants a procedural extension for the filing of a Defence in the ongoing dispute between Hopkins Architects Dubai and Dubai Properties.
NASH v NIKO [2024] DIFC CFI 033 — Winding-up petition and adjournment standards (08 July 2024)
The DIFC Court clarifies the high threshold for adjourning winding-up petitions, confirming that speculative promises of future investment are insufficient to stave off liquidation for an undisputed judgment debt.
WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2024] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural adjustment of expert evidence timelines (23 May 2024)
The litigation involves a commercial insurance claim brought by Westford Trade Services DMCC and Westford Trade Services (UK) Ltd against Dubai Insurance Co PSC. The dispute centers on the contractual obligations and potential liabilities arising under insurance policies issued by the Defendant.
WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2024] DIFC CFI 033 — Amendment of expert evidence protocols (27 March 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes a procedural shift in trade credit insurance litigation by permitting specialized expert testimony on underwriting and supply chain finance.
WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2024] DIFC CFI 033 — Consent order for document production timeline (25 January 2024)
The litigation involves a Part 7 claim initiated on 9 May 2022 by Westford Trade Services DMCC and its UK-based affiliate, Westford Trade Services (UK) Ltd, against Dubai Insurance Co PSC.
WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural adjustment to the Case Management Order (29 November 2023)
The DIFC Court of First Instance formalizes a consensual extension of time for the filing of pleadings, reflecting the court's pragmatic approach to case management timelines.
WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — withdrawal of procedural application (26 September 2023)
This order formalizes the procedural termination of an interlocutory application concerning the cross-use of evidentiary materials between related DIFC proceedings.
WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES v DUBAI INSURANCE [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — procedural extension for detailed assessment (15 September 2023)
A procedural consent order clarifying the timeline for cost recovery following the consolidation of proceedings in the DIFC Court of First Instance.
WESTFORD TRADE SERVICES DMCC v DUBAI INSURANCE CO [2023] DIFC CFI 033 — Consolidation of insurance claims amid international sanctions (22 June 2023)
The dispute arose from the Defendant’s decision to decline insurance cover under a single policy for two related entities, Westford Trade Services DMCC and Westford Trade Services (UK) Ltd.