LITT
Try LITT free
ZAYA LIVING REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT v CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CORPORATION [2023] DIFC CFI 051 — Denial of permission to appeal costs certificate (02 November 2023)
The dispute stems from a Final Costs Certificate issued by Registrar Ayesha Bin Kalban on 31 May 2023, which Zaya Living Real Estate Development L.L.C (the Claimant) sought to appeal.
ZAYA LIVING REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT v CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CORPORATION [2023] DIFC CFI 051 — Registrar denies retrospective extension for costs appeal (21 August 2023)
The dispute originated from the issuance of a Final Costs Certificate by Registrar Ayesha Bin Kalban on 31 May 2023, which quantified the costs payable following the underlying litigation between Zaya Living Real Estate Development L.L.C (the Claimant) and China State Construction Engineering…
Zaya Living Real Estate Development v China State Construction Engineering Corporation [2023] DIFC CFI 051/2022 — Registrar denies retrospective extension for costs appeal (17 August 2023)
The dispute stems from the underlying litigation between Zaya Living Real Estate Development and China State Construction Engineering Corporation (Middle East). Following the conclusion of the main proceedings, the Registrar issued a Final Costs Certificate on 31 May 2023.
ZAYA LIVING REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT v CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CORPORATION [2023] DIFC CFI 051 — Final assessment of costs following a successful jurisdiction challenge (31 May 2023)
The Registrar issues a Final Costs Certificate quantifying the financial burden on the Claimant following a failed attempt to establish DIFC Court jurisdiction over a construction dispute.
Zaya Living Real Estate Development v China State Construction Engineering Corporation [2023] DIFC CFI 051 — Refusal of second permission to appeal regarding arbitration referral (02 May 2023)
The litigation arises from a construction contract concerning the Hameni Tower project located in Jumeirah Village Circle, Dubai. The relationship between the developer, Zaya Living Real Estate Development L.L.C, and the contractor, China State Construction Engineering Corporation (Middle East)…
Zaya Living Real Estate Development v China State Construction Engineering Corporation [2023] DIFC CFI 051 — Refusal of permission to appeal regarding jurisdictional limits (01 February 2023)
The DIFC Court of First Instance confirms that it lacks the statutory authority to intervene in onshore Dubai arbitrations or to grant declaratory relief where the seat of arbitration is not within the DIFC.
ZAYA LIVING REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT v CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CORPORATION [2022] DIFC CFI 051 — Procedural management of jurisdictional challenges (02 September 2022)
The dispute arises from a Part 8 claim initiated by Zaya Living Real Estate Development LLC against China State Construction Engineering Corporation (Middle East) LLC. While the specific underlying commercial grievance—typically involving construction contracts or real estate development…
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v COMMISSIONER OF DATA PROTECTION [2021] DIFC CFI 051 — Consolidation of data protection appeals (21 February 2021)
The litigation concerns a regulatory dispute involving the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) and the Commissioner of Data Protection, with Anna Waterhouse named as a respondent in the first claim and an interested party in the second.
THE DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v THE COMMISSIONER OF DATA PROTECTION [2020] DIFC CFI 051 — Regulatory costs and appeal finality (28 October 2020)
The DIFC Court of First Instance clarifies that regulatory bodies are not immune from adverse costs orders and reinforces the jurisdictional limits regarding second appeals in statutory data protection matters.
THE DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v THE COMMISSIONER OF DATA PROTECTION [2020] DIFC CFI 051 — Regulatory investigation and data subject access rights (12 August 2020)
The dispute arose from a regulatory investigation conducted by the DFSA into Deutsche Bank and its employees, including Ms Anna Waterhouse, who served as Head of Legal & Compliance for the Middle East and North Africa.
THE DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v THE COMMISSIONER OF DATA PROTECTION [2020] DIFC CFI 051 — Regulatory investigation and subject access request disclosure obligations (01 June 2020)
The dispute arises from the DFSA’s refusal to comply with a Subject Access Request (SAR) submitted by Ms Anna Waterhouse, a former Head of Legal & Compliance at Deutsche Bank. Following a lengthy investigation into regulatory breaches within the bank’s Private Wealth Management team, the DFSA…
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v COMMISSIONER OF DATA PROTECTION [2019] DIFC CFI 051 — Regulatory data protection appeal and judicial review (05 August 2019)
The litigation arises from a regulatory conflict involving the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) and the Commissioner of Data Protection, with Anna Waterhouse named as the second defendant.
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v COMMISSIONER OF DATA PROTECTION [2019] DIFC CFI 051 — Procedural management of data protection appeals (07 February 2019)
The Deputy Registrar establishes a rigid procedural framework for an appeal under the Data Protection Law, rejecting attempts to stay proceedings while synchronizing evidentiary records with related litigation.
DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v COMMISSIONER OF DATA PROTECTION [2018] DIFC CFI 051 — Joinder of parties in data protection appeals (21 November 2018)
The dispute centers on an appeal initiated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) against the Commissioner of Data Protection, brought pursuant to Article 37(1) of DIFC Law No. 1 of 2007 (The Data Protection Law).
THE DUBAI FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY v THE COMMISSIONER OF DATA PROTECTION [2018] DIFC CFI 051 — Procedural directions for data protection appeals (17 September 2018)
The lawsuit concerns a regulatory appeal brought by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) against a decision issued by the Commissioner of Data Protection. The proceedings are grounded in Article 37(1) of DIFC Law No.
GLOBEMED GULF HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2024] DIFC CFI 051 — Permission to appeal granted due to quantum inconsistencies (04 December 2024)
The dispute centers on the final quantification of damages awarded to the Claimant, Globemed Gulf Healthcare Solutions, following a trial regarding a Third-Party Administrator (TPA) agreement.
GLOBEMED GULF HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2024] DIFC CFI 051 — Quantum determination following TPA agreement breach (05 September 2024)
The DIFC Court of First Instance finalizes the quantum of damages at AED 66.8 million, resolving a long-standing dispute over the financial implications of a terminated Third-Party Administrator (TPA) agreement.
GLOBEMED GULF HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2024] DIFC CFI 051 — Permission to appeal granted (31 July 2024)
The dispute centers on the interpretation of a Side Agreement and the subsequent award of damages against Oman Insurance Company. The Appellant, Oman Insurance Company, is seeking a comprehensive review of the primary findings made by the Court of First Instance.
GLOBEMED GULF HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2024] DIFC CFI 051 — procedural extension for appeal filings (26 March 2024)
The underlying litigation in CFI 051/2017 involves a complex commercial dispute between Globemed Gulf Healthcare Solutions LLC and Oman Insurance Company PSC. Following the judgment delivered by H.E.
GLOBEMED GULF HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2024] DIFC CFI 051 — extension of time for appellant’s notice (21 February 2024)
The underlying litigation, registered as CFI 051/2017, involves a complex commercial dispute between Globemed Gulf Healthcare Solutions and Oman Insurance Company. Following a substantive judgment delivered by H.E.
GLOBEMED GULF HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2017] DIFC CFI 051 — Breach of TPA Agreement and the validity of side agreements (30 January 2024)
The Court of First Instance affirms the validity of a Third-Party Administration (TPA) agreement, rejecting arguments of corporate nullity and unfulfilled conditions precedent in a complex dispute over lost profits.
GLOBEMED GULF HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 051 — Procedural directions for trial logistics (16 May 2023)
The litigation involves a complex commercial dispute between Globemed Gulf Healthcare Solutions LLC and Oman Insurance Company PSC. While the underlying merits of the claim remain subject to ongoing adjudication, the procedural history of CFI 051/2017 indicates a high-stakes conflict involving…
GLOBEMED GULF HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 051 — Procedural extension for expert joint memoranda (15 March 2023)
The litigation involves a complex commercial dispute between Globemed Gulf Healthcare Solutions and Oman Insurance Company, which has been active in the DIFC Court of First Instance since 2017.
GLOBEMED GULF HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS v OMAN INSURANCE COMPANY [2023] DIFC CFI 051 — Expert evidence timeline adjustment (01 March 2023)
The litigation involves a complex commercial dispute between Globemed Gulf Healthcare Solutions and Oman Insurance Company, initiated under claim number CFI 051/2017. While the specific merits of the claim remain subject to ongoing proceedings, the matter concerns contractual obligations within the…