LITT
Try LITT free
Five Real Estate Development v Reem Emirates Aluminium [2023] DIFC TCD 009: The High Cost of Procedural Overreach in Construction Disputes
How the Technology and Construction Division is hardening its stance against flawed delay analysis and procedural brinkmanship.
Ssangyong-Besix v First Abu Dhabi Bank [2020] DIFC TCD 004: The Procedural Rigour of the Technology and Construction Division
How the TCD manages complex joint venture disputes through disciplined case management and preliminary issue resolution
Brogan Middle East Scaffolding v Arabtec Construction [2021] DIFC TCD 008: The High Cost of Procedural Default in Construction Litigation
How a failure to engage with the DIFC Court’s procedural requirements led to a multi-million dirham default judgment.
Alucor v Rohr Rein Chemie [2021] DIFC TCD 001: The Limits of Clawing Back Dubai Court Judgments
Navigating the intersection of exclusive jurisdiction clauses and the finality of onshore payment orders
Bond Interior Design v Tr88house Restaurant [2023] DIFC TCD 001: The High Cost of Procedural Laxity in Construction Litigation
From a failed default judgment to a final account victory, the TCD’s latest ruling serves as a masterclass in the necessity of strict procedural compliance.
Rafid Gourmet v DIF Interior Decoration [2023] DIFC TCD 003: The High Cost of Procedural Finality in Construction Disputes
When the DIFC Court shuts the door on post-judgment evidence, practitioners must reckon with the absolute finality of perfected orders.
Five Real Estate Development v Reem Emirates Aluminium [2021] DIFC TCD 003: The Perils of Procedural Prematurity in Default Judgments
How a three-week procedural tug-of-war in the Technology and Construction Division serves as a masterclass in the strict application of the Rules of the DIFC Courts. On 11 October 2021, H.E.
Nest Investments v Deloitte [2021] DIFC TCD 003: The High Cost of Procedural Missteps in Lebanese Law Disputes
How a multi-year battle over audit failures and limitation periods redefined the DIFC’s approach to foreign law evidence
Five Real Estate Development v Reem Emirates Aluminium [2023] DIFC TCD 009: The High Cost of Procedural Overreach in Construction Disputes
A multi-year construction litigation saga concludes with a AED 17 million judgment, underscoring the dangers of post-judgment re-litigation.
Gate Mena v Tabarak Investment Capital [2022] DIFC TCD 001: The High Cost of Misjudged Cryptocurrency Custody
How a failed 300 BTC transaction in the DIFC exposed the limits of fiduciary liability and the necessity of rigorous evidence in digital asset disputes.