Litt
Try Litt Free
Tan Liang Joo John v Attorney-General [2019] SGHC 263
YCH Distripark Pte Ltd v Collector of Land Revenue [2019] SGCA 59
Yap Chen Hsiang Osborn v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGCA 40
Kong Hoo (Pte) Ltd and another v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGCA 21
Ho Man Yuk v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGCA 2
Ramesh a/l Perumal v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2019] SGCA 17
Evan Lim Industrial / Warehousing Development Pte Ltd v MWA Capital Pte Ltd and another [2018] SGCA 76
Public Prosecutor v Lam Leng Hung and others [2018] SGCA 7
Comfort Management Pte Ltd v OGSP Engineering Pte Ltd [2018] SGCA 19
Attorney-General v Ting Choon Meng and another appeal [2017] SGCA 6
Public Prosecutor v BAB [2017] SGCA 2
ABU v Comptroller of Income Tax [2015] SGCA 4
Kok Chong Weng and Others v Wiener Robert Lorenz and Others (Ankerite Pte Ltd, intervener) [2009] SGCA 7
Lian Hwee Choo Phebe and Another v Maxz Universal Development Group Pte Ltd and Others [2009] SGCA 4
Tan Siew Tian and Others v Lee Khek Ern Ken [2008] SGCA 25
Chief Assessor and Another v First DCS Pte Ltd [2008] SGCA 15
The "Seaway" [2004] SGCA 57
Progress Software Corp (S) Pte Ltd v Central Provident Fund Board [2003] SGCA 6
Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Lee Kuan Yew [2001] SGCA 55
Collector of Land Revenue v Heng Long Investment Pte Ltd [2001] SGCA 47
Decoding Legislation: Core Principles of Statutory Interpretation
Statutory interpretation ensures laws align with legislative intent while adapting to modern realities. Courts use the literal, golden, mischief, and purposive rules to balance strict textual reading with practical application, ensuring justice and legal certainty.
Mimansa Sutras: Bridging Ancient Wisdom and Modern Jurisprudence
The Mimansa principles, rooted in ancient Indian jurisprudence, offer timeless methodologies for statutory interpretation. Balancing textual fidelity with ethical reasoning, they harmonize tradition and modernity, enriching contemporary legal frameworks and advancing equity.