LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v CRH [2024] SGHC 34

In Public Prosecutor v CRH, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing, Statutory Interpretation — Penal statutes.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Hang Huo Investment Pte Ltd v Wong Pheng Cheong Martin [2024] SGHC 32

In Hang Huo Investment Pte Ltd v Wong Pheng Cheong Martin, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Companies — Receiver and manager, Statutory Interpretation — Construction of statute.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

DGX v DGY [2024] SGHC 17

In DGX v DGY, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Conflict of Laws — Foreign judgment, Statutory Interpretation — Construction of statute.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Nagarajan Murugesan v Grand Rich Electrical & Engineering Pte Ltd and others [2023] SGHC 36

A deemed owner of a property who receives a cash grant for rental relief under s 19D(1) of the CTMA is not a tenant for the purposes of ss 19H and 19J of the CTMA and is not entitled to further rental waiver.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

The Inquiry Pte Ltd v Attorney-General and another matter [2023] SGHC 247

The High Court held that in an appeal under s 17 of the POFMA, the court must determine whether the subject material contained the subject statement at the time it was first communicated, and post-issuance amendments (such as addenda) are not relevant to this determination.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Xu Yuan Chen (alias Terry Xu) v Attorney-General [2023] SGHC 200

The court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a Correction Direction issued under the POFMA, finding that the subject statements were false and that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for setting aside the direction.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

The "Seaway" [2003] SGHC 315

In The "Seaway" [2003] SGHC 315, the High Court dismissed the defendants' appeal regarding limitation of liability under the Merchant Shipping Act. Despite the ruling, the court ordered the defendants to pay the plaintiffs' costs, as they failed on the primary issue that dominated the appeal.

Sushant Shukla· ·7 min read
Singapore

Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2192 v Regenthill Properties Pte Ltd [2002] SGHC 26

Section 37(4) of the Land Titles (Strata) Act requires developers to hand over accounting records relating to the building to the management corporation upon its formation.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v Tsao Kok Wah [2001] SGHC 27

In Public Prosecutor v Tsao Kok Wah [2001], the High Court ruled that mandatory enhanced sentencing under section 458A of the Penal Code applies to attempted housebreaking. The court allowed the prosecution's appeal, imposing six strokes of caning to reflect the equal culpability of attempted crimes

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Japura Development Pte Ltd v Singapore Telecommunications Ltd [2000] SGHC 84

Section 107(1) of the 1992 Act brings pre-existing installations within the scope of the Act and cures failures to comply with procedural requirements in relation to those installations.

Sushant Shukla· ·13 min read
Singapore

Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General

The Court held that the respondent bears the burden of proof in POFMA appeal proceedings to establish that a statement is false, and that the standard of proof is on the balance of probabilities.

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor [2022] SGHC 241

In Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Statutory Interpretation — Construction of statute, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Sabrina Sim Xin Huey v Public Prosecutor [2022] SGHC 240

In Sabrina Sim Xin Huey v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Statutory Interpretation — Construction of statute, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Public Prosecutor v BAB [2016] SGHC 61

In Public Prosecutor v BAB, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Statutory offences, Statutory Interpretation — Construction of statute.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Soon Ah See and another v Diao Yanmei [2016] SGHC 185

In Soon Ah See v Diao Yanmei [2016] SGHC 185, the Court ruled that a marriage of convenience does not trigger the automatic revocation of a CPF nomination under the CPF Act. The Court upheld the nomination in favor of the plaintiffs, confirming that statutory protections apply only to genuine unions

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General and others [2023] SGHC 14

In Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General and others, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Statutory Interpretation — Construction of statute, Tort — Assault and battery.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Tan Chee Heong v Chen Hua [2023] SGHC 118

In Tan Chee Heong v Chen Hua [2023] SGHC 118, the High Court affirmed that claimants may abandon excess claims to meet District Court limits via notice without amending pleadings. It also ruled that contributory negligence reductions apply to total assessed damages, not the statutory cap.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Kori Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Nam Hong Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 25

In Kori Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Nam Hong Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Building and Construction Law — statutes and regulations, Statutory Interpretation.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

The Attorney-General v The Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council [2015] SGHC 137

The High Court dismissed the Attorney-General's application against AHPETC, ruling that the MND failed to establish a legal basis for the requested declarations. The court held that its discretionary power to grant declarations will not be exercised if they serve no practical or useful purpose.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Kee Yau Chong v S H Interdeco Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 218

In Kee Yau Chong v S H Interdeco Pte Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Statutory Interpretation — Construction of Statute, Statutory Interpretation — Definitions.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd v Ong Boon Lin Lester [2013] SGHC 163

In Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd v Ong Boon Lin Lester, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — illegality and public policy, Statutory Interpretation — definitions.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Low Guang Hong David and others v Suryono Wino Goei [2012] SGHC 93

In Low Guang Hong David and others v Suryono Wino Goei, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Probate and Administration — intestate succession, Statutory Interpretation — definitions.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd v Ong Boon Lin Lester [2011] SGHC 73

In Marina Bay Sands Pte Ltd v Ong Boon Lin Lester, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Statutory Interpretation — Construction of Statute.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Xu Ren Li v Nakano Singapore (Pte) Ltd [2011] SGHC 197

In Xu Ren Li v Nakano Singapore (Pte) Ltd, the High Court of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Employment Law, Statutory Interpretation.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read