LITTLITT Try LITT free
Singapore

Rainforest Coffee Products Pte Ltd v Rainforest Cafe, Inc [2000] SGCA 21

In Rainforest Coffee Products Pte Ltd v Rainforest Cafe, Inc, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Trade Marks and Trade Names — Defence, Trade Marks and Trade Names — Infringement.

Sushant Shukla· ·10 min read
Singapore

Gn Muey Muey v Goh Poh Choo [2000] SGCA 20

In Gn Muey Muey v Goh Poh Choo [2000] SGCA 20, the Court of Appeal upheld the validity of a land sale contract, ruling that minor drafting errors and the absence of standard conditions do not invalidate an agreement if essential terms like property identity and price are ascertainable.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

National Aerated Water Co Pte Ltd v Monarch Co, Inc [2000] SGCA 2

In National Aerated Water Co Pte Ltd v Monarch Co, Inc, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms, Damages — Compensation and damages.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Lifestyle 1.99 Pte Ltd v S$1.99 Pte Ltd (trading as ONE.99 SHOP) [2000] SGCA 19

In Lifestyle 1.99 Pte Ltd v S$1.99 Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, ruling that the respondent failed to prove passing off. The court held that descriptive trade names like '1.99' cannot be monopolized, and small differences in branding are sufficient to avoid deception.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Lum Chang Building Contractors Pte Ltd v Anderson Land Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 18

Case Details * Citation: [2000] SGCA 18 * Case Number: CA 137/1999 * Decision Date: 05 April 2000 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore * Coram: Chao Hick Tin JA; Tan Lee Meng J; L

Sushant Shukla· ·14 min read
Singapore

Tan Tiang Hin Jerry v Singapore Medical Council [2000] SGCA 17

The Court of Appeal quashed the Complaints Committee's decision, ruling it acted ultra vires and breached natural justice by failing to provide Dr. Tan notice or a hearing for specific charges. The court affirmed that disciplinary bodies must strictly adhere to their statutory mandates.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Kitnasamy s/o Marudapan v Nagatheran s/o Manogar and Another [2000] SGCA 16

In Kitnasamy s/o Marudapan v Nagatheran s/o Manogar and Another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Injunctions, Civil Procedure — Originating processes.

Sushant Shukla· ·10 min read
Singapore

Arokiasamy Joseph v Singapore Airlines Staff Union [2000] SGCA 15

In Arokiasamy Joseph v Singapore Airlines Staff Union, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Administrative Law — Dismissal from employment, Employment Law — Unfair dismissal.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Hong Huat Development Co (Pte) Ltd v Hiap Hong & Co Pte Ltd [2000] SGCA 14

In Hong Huat Development Co v Hiap Hong & Co [2000] SGCA 14, the Court of Appeal clarified that an arbitrator's delay does not constitute misconduct sufficient to set aside an award. The court emphasized that parties must pursue formal appeal procedures rather than collateral challenges.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Lau Lee Peng v Public Prosecutor [2000] SGCA 13

In Lau Lee Peng v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Criminal Law — Offences.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read
Singapore

Microsoft Corp and Others v SM Summit Holdings Ltd and Another (No 2) [2000] SGCA 12

In Microsoft Corp and Others v SM Summit Holdings Ltd and Another (No 2), the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Courts and Jurisdiction — Court of appeal, Words and Phrases — "Original Criminal Jurisdiction".

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Parfums Rochas SA and Others v Davidson Singapore Pte Ltd and Another [2000] SGCA 11

In Parfums Rochas SA and Others v Davidson Singapore Pte Ltd and Another, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Discharge, Damages — Assessment.

Sushant Shukla· ·10 min read
Singapore

IHC Pte Ltd v Mustafa Ali Jumabhoy [2000] SGCA 10

In IHC Pte Ltd v Mustafa Ali Jumabhoy [2000] SGCA 10, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, holding that the respondent's claim for recovery of shares was barred by a prior agreement to contribute those shares for capitalisation, which would be breached by their return.

Sushant Shukla· ·8 min read
Singapore

Ching Mun Fong (executrix of the estate of Tan Geok Tee, deceased) v Liu Cho Chit and Another Appeal [2000] SGCA 1

In Ching Mun Fong (executrix of the estate of Tan Geok Tee, deceased) v Liu Cho Chit and Another Appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Pleadings, Res Judicata — Extended doctrine of res judicata.

Sushant Shukla· ·9 min read