LITT
Try LITT free
Yeo Kang Oh v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGCA 74
In Yeo Kang Oh v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Yeo Peng Hock Henry v Pai Lily [2001] SGCA 73
In Yeo Peng Hock Henry v Pai Lily, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Yap Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGCA 71
In Yap Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Singapore Airlines Limited v Tan Shwu Leng [2001] SGCA 70
In Singapore Airlines Limited v Tan Shwu Leng, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Tan Hin Leong v Lee Teck Im [2001] SGCA 7
In Tan Hin Leong v Lee Teck Im, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Land — Licences.
Singapore Airlines Ltd v Tan Shwu Leng and another appeal [2001] SGCA 69
In Singapore Airlines Ltd v Tan Shwu Leng and another appeal, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Appeals, Civil Procedure — Costs.
Tan Hun Hoe v Harte Denis Mathew [2001] SGCA 68
In Tan Hun Hoe v Harte Denis Mathew, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs, Damages — Appeals.
Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy and another appeal and Others [2001] SGCA 67
In Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy and another appeal and Others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Costs.
Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd and Another v Fraser & Neave Limited and Others [2001] SGCA 66
In Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd and Another v Fraser & Neave Limited and Others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd and Another v Fraser & Neave Ltd and Others [2001] SGCA 65
In Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd and Another v Fraser & Neave Ltd and Others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Appeals, Civil Procedure — Judgments and orders.
Ho Kon Kim v Besty Lim Gek Kim and Others [2001] SGCA 64
Case Details * Citation: [2001] SGCA 64 * Case Number: CA 164/2000, Suit 165/2000Q, CA 167/2000 * Decision Date: 26 September 2001 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore * Coram: Chao Hick Tin
S3 Building Services Pte Ltd v Sky Technology Pte Ltd [2001] SGCA 63
In S3 Building Services Pte Ltd v Sky Technology Pte Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Delay, Civil Procedure — Striking out.
Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy and Others and Another Appeal [2001] SGCA 62
Case Details * Citation: [2001] SGCA 62 * Case Number: CA 164/2000, 167/2000 * Decision Date: 26 September 2001 * Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore * Coram: Chao Hick Tin JA; L P Thean
Harris Hakim v Allgreen Properties Ltd [2001] SGCA 61
In Harris Hakim v Allgreen Properties Ltd, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Damages — Measure of damages, Land — Conveyance.
Mohamad Noor Bin Abdullah and Public Prosecutor [2001] SGCA 60
Analysis of [2001] SGCA 60, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-09-11.
Wu Fu Ping and Another v Ong Beng Seng and Others [2001] SGCA 6
In Wu Fu Ping and Another v Ong Beng Seng and Others, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Contract — Contractual terms.
Hinckley Singapore Trading Pte Ltd v Sogo Department Stores (S) Pte Ltd (under judicial management) [2001] SGCA 59
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal in Hinckley Singapore Trading v Sogo, ruling the relationship was debtor-creditor, not trustee-beneficiary. The court held that without express trust clauses or fund segregation, proceeds constitute a simple debt, requiring the appellant to prove as a credito
The Development Bank of Singapore Limited v Ong Yew Huat and Others [2001] SGCA 58
The Court of Appeal ruled in favor of DBS, holding that further facilities extended to Sogo remained secured under the existing all-money charge. The court rejected estoppel arguments, affirming that a letter of demand does not terminate security interests or require disclosure of facility changes.
Re Tararone Investments Pte Ltd [2001] SGCA 57
Analysis of [2001] SGCA 57, a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore on 2001-09-04.
Ashok Kumar Giri v Public Prosecutor [2001] SGCA 56
In Ashok Kumar Giri v Public Prosecutor, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of No catchword.
Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Lee Kuan Yew [2001] SGCA 55
In Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Lee Kuan Yew, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Civil Procedure — Striking out, Statutory Interpretation — Statutes.
Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore (No 3) [2001] SGCA 54
In Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore [2001], the Court of Appeal set aside an order allowing third-party intervention, ruling that inherent jurisdiction requires compelling reasons and a clear need, rather than mere interest in the outcome of disciplinary proceedings.
Daewoo Singapore Pte Ltd v CEL Tractors Pte Ltd [2001] SGCA 53
A scheme of arrangement under s 210 of the Companies Act can validly incorporate a term releasing third-party guarantors from their obligations, provided the scheme is approved by the requisite majority and the court.
Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Indra Krishnan [2001] SGCA 52
In Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Indra Krishnan, the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore addressed issues of Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy.